Literature DB >> 7071332

Experience with metrizamide in patients with previous severe anaphylactoid reactions to ionic contrast agents.

S Rapoport, J J Bookstein, C B Higgins, P H Carey, M Sovak, E C Lasser.   

Abstract

Metrizamide was employed in six patients who, during angiography, had had severe anaphylactoid reactions to conventional ionic contrast media. Five of these patients had received corticoid premedication before injection of both conventional contrast medium and metrizamide; anaphylaxis occurred only after administration of conventional contrast media. Four patients had no detectable reaction whatsoever after metrizamide; a fifth had only transient tachycardia. In the sixth patient, delayed edema developed in the region of his cerebral arteriovenous malformation. These observations suggest a marked decrease in the incidence and severity of anaphylactoid reactions when metrizamide is substituted in patients who have reacted to ionic contrast media. Metrizamide, or a comparable nonionic contrast agent, should be strongly considered in patients who have had a severe reaction to conventional contrast medium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7071332     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.143.2.7071332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  7 in total

Review 1.  Reactions to radiocontrast material. Anaphylactoid events in radiology.

Authors:  P L Lieberman; R L Seigle
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 2.  Anaphylactoid reactions to radiocontrast material.

Authors:  P Lieberman
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy       Date:  1991 Fall-Winter

3.  The new contrast agents: a perspective.

Authors:  M A Bettmann
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 4.  Should nonionic radiographic contrast media be given to all patients?

Authors:  P S Parfrey; B C Cramer; P J McManamon
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1988-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Radiocontrast reactions.

Authors:  P Lieberman; R L Siegle; G Treadwell
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy       Date:  1986-05

6.  Efficacy and safety of digital subtraction angiography with special reference to contrast agents.

Authors:  W Seyferth; G Dilbat; E Zeitler
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Low osmolar contrast media.

Authors:  R G Grainger
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-07-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.