| Literature DB >> 30948751 |
Maxim Verboven1, Anne Cuypers1, Dorien Deluyker1, Ivo Lambrichts1, Bert O Eijnde1, Dominique Hansen1,2, Virginie Bito3.
Abstract
Exercise training is a low cost and safe approach for reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease development. Currently, moderate-intensity training (MIT) is the most preferred exercise type. However, high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is gaining interest especially among athletes and healthy individuals. In this study, we examined cardiac remodeling resulting from MIT and HIIT in healthy rats. Healthy male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to MIT or HIIT for 13 weeks. Animals kept sedentary (SED) were used as control. Cardiac function was evaluated with echocardiography and hemodynamic measurements. Heart tissue was stained for capillary density and fibrosis. After 13 weeks of training, only HIIT induced beneficial cardiac hypertrophy. Overall global cardiac parameters (such as ejection fraction, cardiac output and volumes) were improved similarly between both training modalities. At tissue level, collagen content was significantly and similarly reduced in both exercise groups. Finally, only HIIT increased significantly capillary density. Our data indicate that even if very different in design, HIIT and MIT appear to be equally effective in improving cardiac function in healthy rats. Furthermore, HIIT provides additional benefits through improved capillary density and should therefore be considered as a preferred training modality for athletes and for patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30948751 PMCID: PMC6449502 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-42023-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Conventional echocardiographic parameters after 13 weeks of exercise training.
| SED (N = 10) | MIT (N = 8) | HIIT (N = 8) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HR (bpm) | 347 ± 7 | 325 ± 10 | 314 ± 13 |
| AWT (mm) | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.4* |
| PWT (mm) | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.1* |
| EDV (µL) | 413 ± 24 | 436 ± 27 | 426 ± 12 |
| ESV (µL) | 154 ± 10 | 107 ± 10* | 95 ± 7* |
| SV (µL) | 259 ± 17 | 329 ± 22* | 331 ± 7* |
| CO (ml/min) | 89.4 ± 5.5 | 106.7 ± 7.6 | 104.0 ± 5.7 |
| EF | 63 ± 1 | 76 ± 2* | 78 ± 1* |
HR, heart rate; AWT, anterior wall thickness; PWT, posterior wall thickness; EDV, end-diastolic volume; ESV, end-systolic volume; SV, stroke volume; CO, cardiac output; EF, ejection fraction. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. *Denotes p < 0.05 vs. SED.
Hemodynamic parameters after 13 weeks of exercise training.
| SED (N = 10) | MIT (N = 8) | HIIT (N = 8) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LVP (mmHg) | 108 ± 3 | 96 ± 2* | 96 ± 2* |
| EDP (mmHg) | 5.2 ± 0.4 | 3.9 ± 0.4 | 3.7 ± 0.6 |
| Tau (ms) | 0.01 ± 0.001 | 0.01 ± 0.001 | 0.008 ± 0.002 |
| dP/dtmax (mmHg/s) | 7354 ± 274 | 7382 ± 277 | 7340 ± 258 |
| dP/dtmin (mmHg/s) | −7530 ± 211 | −7489 ± 215 | −7190 ± 203 |
LVP, left ventricular pressure; EDP, end diastolic pressure; Tau, relaxation time constant; dP/dtmax, peak rate of pressure rise; dP/dtmin, peak rate of pressure decline. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. *Denotes p < 0.05 vs. SED.
Figure 1Exercise intervention reduces cardiac collagen content. Representative images of interstitial collagen, as indicated by the arrows, in LV sections obtained with Sirius red/Fast Green in SED, MIT and HIIT groups. (b) Total interstitial collagen quantification in SED (N = 10), MIT (N = 8) and HIIT (N = 8). Data are shown as mean ± SEM. *Denotes p < 0.05 vs. SED.
Figure 2Exercise intervention increases citrate synthase activity and capillary density. (a) Citrate synthase activity, measured in LV homogenates, in all groups. (b) Capillary density expressed as blood vessels per surface area, in the three groups. (c) Protein level of endothelin-1, normalized to β-actin. (d) Protein level of NADPH Oxidase 2 (NOX2), normalized to β-actin. (e) Protein level of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) complex IV, normalized to β- actin. (f) Enzyme activity of complex II in cardiac tissue. (g) Results of representative Western blots. Cropped images of Western blot, for full blots see Supplementary Figs 1–3. All blots were performed individually. Data are shown as mean ± SEM from SED (N = 10), MIT (N = 8) and HIIT (N = 8) for graphs, blots represent a partial blot. *Denotes p < 0.05 vs. SED.