Literature DB >> 30945292

Cervical vertebral body growth and emergence of sexual dimorphism: a developmental study using computed tomography.

Courtney A Miller1, Seong Jae Hwang2, Meghan M Cotter3, Houri K Vorperian1.   

Abstract

The size and shape of human cervical vertebral bodies serve as a reference for measurement or treatment planning in multiple disciplines. It is therefore necessary to understand thoroughly the developmental changes in the cervical vertebrae in relation to the changing biomechanical demands on the neck during the first two decades of life. To delineate sex-specific changes in human cervical vertebral bodies, 23 landmarks were placed in the midsagittal plane to define the boundaries of C2 to C7 in 123 (73 M; 50 F) computed tomography scans from individuals, ages 6 months to 19 years. Size was calculated as the geometric area, from which sex-specific growth trend, rate, and type for each vertebral body were determined, as well as length measures of local deformation-based morphometry vectors from the centroid to each landmark. Additionally, for each of the four pubertal-staged age cohorts, sex-specific vertebral body wireframes were superimposed using generalized Procrustes analysis to determine sex-specific changes in form (size and shape) and shape alone. Our findings reveal that C2 was unique in achieving more of its adult size by 5 years, particularly in females. In contrast, C3-C7 had a second period of accelerated growth during puberty. The vertebrae of males and females were significantly different in size, particularly after puberty, when males had larger cervical vertebral bodies. Male growth outpaced female growth around age 10 years and persisted until around age 19-20 years, whereas females completed growth earlier, around age 17-18 years. The greatest shape differences between males and females occurred during puberty. Both sexes had similar growth in the superoinferior height, but males also displayed more growth in anteroposterior depth. Such prominent sex differences in size, shape, and form are likely the result of differences in growth rate and growth duration. Female vertebrae are thus not simply smaller versions of the male vertebrae. Additional research is needed to further quantify growth and help improve age- and sex-specific guidance in clinical practice.
© 2019 Anatomical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical Vertebral Maturation Index; cervical vertebrae; computed tomography; growth and development; human; sexual dimorphism; size and shape; vertebral body

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30945292      PMCID: PMC6534438          DOI: 10.1111/joa.12976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  53 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanics of the cervical spine. I: Normal kinematics.

Authors:  N Bogduk; S Mercer
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Determining skeletal maturation stage using cervical vertebrae: evaluation of three diagnostic methods.

Authors:  Luci Mara Fachardo Jaqueira; Monica Costa Armond; Luciano José Pereira; Carlos Eduardo Pinto de Alcântara; Leandro Silva Marques
Journal:  Braz Oral Res       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec

Review 3.  Postnatal maturation and radiology of the growing spine.

Authors:  Sharon E Byrd; Elizabeth M Comiskey
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.509

4.  Functional morphology of the primate head and neck.

Authors:  Thierra K Nalley; Neysa Grider-Potter
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 2.868

5.  Cervical vertebrae maturation method morphologic criteria: poor reproducibility.

Authors:  Trenton S Nestman; Steven D Marshall; Fang Qian; Nathan Holton; Robert G Franciscus; Thomas E Southard
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Growth of the human vertebral column. An osteological study.

Authors:  R S Tulsi
Journal:  Acta Anat (Basel)       Date:  1971

7.  Male and Female Cervical Spine Biomechanics and Anatomy: Implication for Scaling Injury Criteria.

Authors:  Narayan Yoganandan; Cameron R Bass; Liming Voo; Frank A Pintar
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Gender differences in vertebral sizes in adults: biomechanical implications.

Authors:  V Gilsanz; M I Boechat; R Gilsanz; M L Loro; T F Roe; W G Goodman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  A comparison of hand wrist bone analysis with two different cervical vertebral analysis in measuring skeletal maturation.

Authors:  Saravanan Pichai; M Rajesh; Naveen Reddy; Gopinath Adusumilli; Jayaprakash Reddy; Bhavana Joshi
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2014-09

Review 10.  Size, shape, and form: concepts of allometry in geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  Christian Peter Klingenberg
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 0.900

View more
  4 in total

1.  Growth and sexual dimorphism of the hyoid bone and its relationship to the mandible from birth to 19 years: A three-dimensional computed tomography study.

Authors:  Helen M Werner; Courtney A Miller; Katelyn K Tillman; Yuan Wang; Houri K Vorperian
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 2.227

2.  Evaluation of maxillary and mandibular growth patterns with cephalometric analysis based on cervical vertebral maturation: A Japanese cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Asuka Manabe; Takayoshi Ishida; Eiichiro Kanda; Takashi Ono
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Developmental morphology of the cervical vertebrae and the emergence of sexual dimorphism in size and shape: A computed tomography study.

Authors:  Courtney A Miller; Seong Jae Hwang; Meghan M Cotter; Houri K Vorperian
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 2.227

4.  Anatomic development of the upper airway during the first five years of life: A three-dimensional imaging study.

Authors:  Ying Ji Chuang; Seong Jae Hwang; Kevin A Buhr; Courtney A Miller; Gregory D Avey; Brad H Story; Houri K Vorperian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.