Literature DB >> 33119940

Developmental morphology of the cervical vertebrae and the emergence of sexual dimorphism in size and shape: A computed tomography study.

Courtney A Miller1, Seong Jae Hwang2, Meghan M Cotter3,4, Houri K Vorperian1.   

Abstract

Cervical vertebral bodies undergo substantial morphological development during the first two decades of life that are used clinically to visually determine skeletal maturation with the cervical vertebral maturation index (CVMI). CVMI defines six stages that capture the morphological transformations from 6 years to 18 years. However, CVMI has poor reproducibility given its qualitative nature and does not account for sexual dimorphism. This study aims to quantify the morphological development of the cervical vertebral bodies C2-C7 in size (height and depth) and shape and examine the emergence of sexual dimorphism. Using 115 (70 M;45F) computed tomography studies from typically developing individuals ages 6 months to 20 years, landmarks were placed at the margins of the C2-C7 cervical vertebral bodies in the midsagittal plane for size and shape analysis. Findings revealed a dichotomy in the growth trends of height versus depth. The C2-C7 growth in depth gained the majority of the adult size by age 5 years, while the C3-C7 growth in height displayed two periods of accelerated growth during early childhood and puberty. Significant sex differences were found in height and depth growth trends and the form-space ontogenetic trajectories during puberty, with minor but evident differences emerging at age 3 years. Female C2-C7 depth measures were smaller than males at all ages. However, sex differences in height became evident due to males continuing to grow after females reach maturity. Findings quantify the morphological developmental stages of CVMI and emphasize the need to account for sex differences when assessing skeletal maturation.
© 2020 American Association for Anatomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cervical vertebral body; cervical vertebral maturation index; growth and development; ontogenetic trajectory; sex differences

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33119940      PMCID: PMC8311899          DOI: 10.1002/ar.24559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)        ISSN: 1932-8486            Impact factor:   2.227


  56 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanics of the cervical spine. I: Normal kinematics.

Authors:  N Bogduk; S Mercer
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Passive cervical spine flexion: the effect of age and gender.

Authors:  Thomas Seacrist; Jami Saffioti; Sriram Balasubramanian; Jennifer Kadlowec; Robert Sterner; J Felipe García-España; Kristy B Arbogast; Matthew R Maltese
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 3.  Postnatal maturation and radiology of the growing spine.

Authors:  Sharon E Byrd; Elizabeth M Comiskey
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.509

4.  Functional morphology of the primate head and neck.

Authors:  Thierra K Nalley; Neysa Grider-Potter
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 2.868

5.  Geometric morphometrics on juvenile crania: Exploring age and sex variation in an Australian population.

Authors:  Jacqueline Noble; Andrea Cardini; Ambika Flavel; Daniel Franklin
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  The conceptual framework of ontogenetic trajectories: parallel transport allows the recognition and visualization of pure deformation patterns.

Authors:  P Piras; L Teresi; L Traversetti; V Varano; S Gabriele; T Kotsakis; P Raia; P E Puddu; M Scalici
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.930

7.  Male and Female Cervical Spine Biomechanics and Anatomy: Implication for Scaling Injury Criteria.

Authors:  Narayan Yoganandan; Cameron R Bass; Liming Voo; Frank A Pintar
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Sexual dimorphism of the human mandible and its association with dental development.

Authors:  Michael Coquerelle; Fred L Bookstein; José Braga; Demetrios J Halazonetis; Gerhard W Weber; Philipp Mitteroecker
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.868

9.  A comparison of hand wrist bone analysis with two different cervical vertebral analysis in measuring skeletal maturation.

Authors:  Saravanan Pichai; M Rajesh; Naveen Reddy; Gopinath Adusumilli; Jayaprakash Reddy; Bhavana Joshi
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2014-09

Review 10.  Size, shape, and form: concepts of allometry in geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  Christian Peter Klingenberg
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 0.900

View more
  1 in total

1.  Growth and sexual dimorphism of the hyoid bone and its relationship to the mandible from birth to 19 years: A three-dimensional computed tomography study.

Authors:  Helen M Werner; Courtney A Miller; Katelyn K Tillman; Yuan Wang; Houri K Vorperian
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 2.227

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.