Literature DB >> 12920507

The association between osteoporotic fractures and health-related quality of life as measured by the Health Utilities Index in the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos).

J D Adachi1, G Ioannidis, L Pickard, C Berger, J C Prior, L Joseph, D A Hanley, W P Olszynski, T M Murray, T Anastassiades, W Hopman, J P Brown, S Kirkland, C Joyce, A Papaioannou, S Poliquin, A Tenenhouse, E A Papadimitropoulos.   

Abstract

Osteoporotic fractures can be a major cause of morbidity. It is important to determine the impact of fractures on health-related quality of life (HRQL). A total of 3,394 women and 1,122 men 50 years of age and older, who were recruited for the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos), participated in this cross-sectional study. Minimal trauma fractures of the hip, pelvis, spine, lower body (included upper and lower leg, knee, ankle, and foot), upper body (included arm, elbow, sternum, shoulder, and clavicle), wrist and hand (included forearm, hand, and finger), and ribs were studied. Participants with subclinical vertebral deformities were also examined. The Health Utilities Index Mark II and III Systems were used to assess HRQL. Past osteoporotic fractures varied in prevalence from 1.2% (pelvis) to 27.8% (lower body) in women and 0.3% (pelvis) to 29.3% (wrist) in men. Multivariate linear regression analyses [parameter estimates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI)] indicated that minimal trauma fractures were negatively associated with HRQL and that this relationship depends on fracture type and gender. The multi-attribute scores for the Mark II system were negatively related to hip (-0.05; 95% CI: -0.09, -0.01), lower body (-0.02; 95% CI: -0.03, -0.000), and subclinical vertebral fractures (-0.02; 95% CI: -0.03, -0.00) for women. The multi-attribute scores for the Mark III system were negatively related to hip (-0.09; 95% CI: -0.14, -0.03) and rib fractures (-0.06; 95% CI: -0.11, -0.00) for women, and rib fractures (-0.06; 95% CI: -0.12, -0.00) for men. In conclusion, this study demonstrates a negative association between osteoporotic fractures and quality of life in both women and men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12920507     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-003-1483-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  37 in total

Review 1.  Multi-attribute preference functions. Health Utilities Index.

Authors:  G W Torrance; W Furlong; D Feeny; M Boyle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds.

Authors:  J A Kanis; A Oden; O Johnell; B Jonsson; C de Laet; A Dawson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Quality of life in patients with heart failure: do gender differences exist?

Authors:  M S Riedinger; K A Dracup; M L Brecht; G Padilla; L Sarna; P A Ganz
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.210

4.  The importance of gender on outcome after major trauma: functional and psychologic outcomes in women versus men.

Authors:  T L Holbrook; D B Hoyt; J P Anderson
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2001-02

Review 5.  The clinical impact of vertebral fractures: quality of life in women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  D T Gold
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Risk factors for proximal humerus, forearm, and wrist fractures in elderly men and women: the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study.

Authors:  T V Nguyen; J R Center; P N Sambrook; J A Eisman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Measuring quality of life in women with osteoporosis. Osteoporosis Quality of Life Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Symptomatic fracture incidence in elderly men and women: the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study (DOES).

Authors:  G Jones; T Nguyen; P N Sambrook; P J Kelly; C Gilbert; J A Eisman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Functional recovery after fractures of the distal forearm. Analysis of radiographic and other factors affecting the outcome.

Authors:  J P Kaukonen; E O Karaharju; M Porras; P Lüthje; A Jakobsson
Journal:  Ann Chir Gynaecol       Date:  1988

10.  Epidemiologic features of pelvic fractures.

Authors:  L J Melton; J M Sampson; B F Morrey; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1981 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  53 in total

1.  Low urine pH and acid excretion do not predict bone fractures or the loss of bone mineral density: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tanis R Fenton; Misha Eliasziw; Suzanne C Tough; Andrew W Lyon; Jacques P Brown; David A Hanley
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Evaluation of trabecular microarchitecture in nonosteoporotic postmenopausal women with and without fracture.

Authors:  Richard Kijowski; Michael Tuite; Diane Kruger; Alejandro Munoz Del Rio; Michael Kleerekoper; Neil Binkley
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  The Effect of Age on Fracture Healing Time in Metacarpal Fractures.

Authors:  Ronit Wollstein; Arie Trouw; Lois Carlson; Ilene Staff; Daniel J Mastella; Duffield Ashmead
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-12-02

4.  Accident or osteoporosis?: Survey of community follow-up after low-trauma fracture.

Authors:  Sonia Singh; Ramona Foster; Karim M Khan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Determinants of health-related quality of life in women with vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Alexandra Papaioannou; Courtney C Kennedy; George Ioannidis; Jacques P Brown; Anjali Pathak; David A Hanley; Robert G Josse; Rolf J Sebaldt; Wojciech P Olszynski; Alan Tenenhouse; Timothy M Murray; Annie Petrie; Charles H Goldsmith; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  The FREEDOM trial: Is family medicine ready for biologic therapies?

Authors:  Alan D Bell; Benjamin R Bell
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Antidepressant use and 10-year incident fracture risk: the population-based Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMoS).

Authors:  C Moura; S Bernatsky; M Abrahamowicz; A Papaioannou; L Bessette; J Adachi; D Goltzman; J Prior; N Kreiger; T Towheed; W D Leslie; S Kaiser; G Ioannidis; L Pickard; L-A Fraser; E Rahme
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Impact of impairment and secondary health conditions on health preference among Canadians with chronic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Catharine Craven; Sander L Hitzig; Nicole Mittmann
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 9.  The impact of fragility fracture on health-related quality of life : the importance of antifracture therapy.

Authors:  Ted Xenodemetropoulos; Shawn Davison; George Ioannidis; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  The utilization of appropriate osteoporosis medications improves following a multifaceted educational intervention: the Canadian quality circle project (CQC).

Authors:  George Ioannidis; Alexandra Papaioannou; Lehana Thabane; Amiram Gafni; Anthony Hodsman; Brent Kvern; Aleksandra Walsh; Famida Jiwa; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.