Anmol Gupta1,2, Thomas Cha2, Joseph Schwab2, Harold Fogel2, Daniel G Tobert2, Afshin E Razi2,3, Carl Paulino4, Andrew C Hecht1, Christopher M Bono2, Stuart Hershman2. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, The Mount Sinai Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. 2. Department of Orthopaedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Maimonides Bone and Joint Center, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA. 4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fe Health Sciences University, New York-Presbyterian (NYP) Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients may have osteoporosis, predisposing them to an increased risk for surgical complications. Prior studies have demonstrated that treating osteoporosis improves surgical outcomes. In this study we determine the prevalence of osteoporosis in ASD patients undergoing long spinal fusions and the rate at which osteoporosis is treated. METHODS: ASD patients who frequented either of two major academic medical centers from 2010 through 2019 were studied. All study participants were at least 40 years of age and endured a spinal fusion of at least seven vertebral levels. Medical records were explored for a diagnosis of osteoporosis via ICD-10 code and, if present, whether pharmacological treatment was prescribed. T-tests and chi-squared analyses were used to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-nine patients matched the study's inclusion criteria. Among this group, 131 patients (32.8%) had been diagnosed with osteoporosis prior to surgery. With a mean age of 66.4 years, osteoporotic patients were on average three years older than non-osteoporotic (P=0.002) and more likely to be female (74.8% vs. 61.9%; P=0.01). At the time of surgery, 34.4% of osteoporotic patients were receiving pharmacological treatment. Although not statistically significant, women were more likely to receive medical treatment than men (P=0.07). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of osteoporosis in ASD patients undergoing a long spinal fusion is substantially higher than that of the general population. Surgeons should have a low threshold for bone density testing in ASD patients. With only about one-third of osteoporotic patients treated, there is a classic "missed opportunity" in this population. 2021 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients may have osteoporosis, predisposing them to an increased risk for surgical complications. Prior studies have demonstrated that treating osteoporosis improves surgical outcomes. In this study we determine the prevalence of osteoporosis in ASD patients undergoing long spinal fusions and the rate at which osteoporosis is treated. METHODS: ASD patients who frequented either of two major academic medical centers from 2010 through 2019 were studied. All study participants were at least 40 years of age and endured a spinal fusion of at least seven vertebral levels. Medical records were explored for a diagnosis of osteoporosis via ICD-10 code and, if present, whether pharmacological treatment was prescribed. T-tests and chi-squared analyses were used to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-nine patients matched the study's inclusion criteria. Among this group, 131 patients (32.8%) had been diagnosed with osteoporosis prior to surgery. With a mean age of 66.4 years, osteoporotic patients were on average three years older than non-osteoporotic (P=0.002) and more likely to be female (74.8% vs. 61.9%; P=0.01). At the time of surgery, 34.4% of osteoporotic patients were receiving pharmacological treatment. Although not statistically significant, women were more likely to receive medical treatment than men (P=0.07). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of osteoporosis in ASD patients undergoing a long spinal fusion is substantially higher than that of the general population. Surgeons should have a low threshold for bone density testing in ASD patients. With only about one-third of osteoporotic patients treated, there is a classic "missed opportunity" in this population. 2021 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.
Authors: Joshua D Auerbach; Lawrence G Lenke; Keith H Bridwell; Jennifer K Sehn; Andrew H Milby; David Bumpass; Charles H Crawford; Brian A OʼShaughnessy; Jacob M Buchowski; Michael S Chang; Lukas P Zebala; Brenda A Sides Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2012-06-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Ioannis P Pappou; Federico P Girardi; Harvinder S Sandhu; Hari K Parvataneni; Frank P Cammisa; Robert Schneider; Peter Frelinghuysen; Joseph M Lane Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2006-06-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Kai-Ming G Fu; Prashant Rhagavan; Christopher I Shaffrey; Daniel R Chernavvsky; Justin S Smith Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Jean-Yves Reginster; Gary Hattersley; Gregory C Williams; Ming-Yi Hu; Lorraine A Fitzpatrick; E Michael Lewiecki Journal: Calcif Tissue Int Date: 2018-06-27 Impact factor: 4.333