Literature DB >> 30944842

Systematic analysis of bias and variability of morphologic features for lung lesions in computed tomography.

Jocelyn Hoye1,2,3,4, Justin Solomon1,2,3,4, Thomas J Sauer1,2,3,4, Marthony Robins1,2,3,4, Ehsan Samei1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

We propose to characterize the bias and variability of quantitative morphology features of lung lesions across a range of computed tomography (CT) imaging conditions. A total of 15 lung lesions were simulated (five in each of three spiculation classes: low, medium, and high). For each lesion, a series of simulated CT images representing different imaging conditions were synthesized by applying three-dimensional blur and adding correlated noise based on the measured noise and resolution properties of five commercial multislice CT systems, representing three dose levels ( CTDI vol of 1.90, 3.75, 7.50 mGy), three slice thicknesses (0.625, 1.25, 2.5 mm), and 33 clinical reconstruction kernels from five clinical scanners. The images were segmented using three segmentation algorithms and each algorithm was evaluated by computing a Sørensen-Dice coefficient between the ground truth and the segmentation. A series of 21 shape-based morphology features were extracted from both "ground truth" (i.e., preblur without noise) and "image rendered" lesions (i.e., postblur and with noise). For each morphology feature, the bias was quantified by comparing the percentage relative error in the morphology metric between the imaged lesions and the ground-truth lesions. The variability was characterized by calculating the average coefficient of variation averaged across repeats and imaging conditions. The active contour segmentation had the highest average Dice coefficient of 0.80 followed by 0.63 for threshold, and 0.39 for fuzzy c-means. The bias of the features was segmentation algorithm and feature-dependent, with sharper kernels being less biased and smoother kernels being more biased in general. The feature variability from simulated images ranged from 0.30% to 10% for repeats of the same condition and from 0.74% to 25.3% for different lesions in the same spiculation class. In conclusion, the bias of morphology features is dependent on the acquisition protocol in combination with the segmentation algorithm used and the variability is primarily dependent on the segmentation algorithm.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computed tomography; imaging conditions; lung lesions; morphology; quantitative imaging

Year:  2019        PMID: 30944842      PMCID: PMC6434334          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.6.1.013504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  20 in total

1.  Quantitative CT: technique dependence of volume estimation on pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Baiyu Chen; Huiman Barnhart; Samuel Richard; James Colsher; Maxwell Amurao; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.

Authors:  Sarah J Boyce; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Volumetric quantification of lung nodules in CT with iterative reconstruction (ASiR and MBIR).

Authors:  Baiyu Chen; Huiman Barnhart; Samuel Richard; Marthony Robins; James Colsher; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Computer-aided diagnosis of mass-like lesion in breast MRI: differential analysis of the 3-D morphology between benign and malignant tumors.

Authors:  Yan-Hao Huang; Yeun-Chung Chang; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Tsung-Ju Wu; Jeon-Hor Chen; Ruey-Feng Chang
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Quantitative imaging for evaluation of response to cancer therapy.

Authors:  Laurence P Clarke; Barbara S Croft; Robert Nordstrom; Huiming Zhang; Gary Kelloff; J Tatum
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.243

6.  Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms.

Authors:  Samuel Richard; Daniela B Husarik; Girijesh Yadava; Simon N Murphy; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Update on the non-prewhitening model observer in computed tomography for the assessment of the adaptive statistical and model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms.

Authors:  Julien G Ott; Fabio Becce; Pascal Monnin; Sabine Schmidt; François O Bochud; Francis R Verdun
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 8.  Radiomics: the process and the challenges.

Authors:  Virendra Kumar; Yuhua Gu; Satrajit Basu; Anders Berglund; Steven A Eschrich; Matthew B Schabath; Kenneth Forster; Hugo J W L Aerts; Andre Dekker; David Fenstermacher; Dmitry B Goldgof; Lawrence O Hall; Philippe Lambin; Yoganand Balagurunathan; Robert A Gatenby; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 9.  Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis.

Authors:  Philippe Lambin; Emmanuel Rios-Velazquez; Ralph Leijenaar; Sara Carvalho; Ruud G P M van Stiphout; Patrick Granton; Catharina M L Zegers; Robert Gillies; Ronald Boellard; André Dekker; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach.

Authors:  Hugo J W L Aerts; Emmanuel Rios Velazquez; Ralph T H Leijenaar; Chintan Parmar; Patrick Grossmann; Sara Carvalho; Sara Cavalho; Johan Bussink; René Monshouwer; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Derek Rietveld; Frank Hoebers; Michelle M Rietbergen; C René Leemans; Andre Dekker; John Quackenbush; Robert J Gillies; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  2 in total

1.  Correction for Systematic Bias in Radiomics Measurements Due to Variation in Imaging Protocols.

Authors:  Jocelyn Hoye; Taylor Smith; Ehsan Abadi; Justin B Solomon; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2021-06-13       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Quantification of Minimum Detectable Difference in Radiomics Features Across Lesions and CT Imaging Conditions.

Authors:  Jocelyn Hoye; Justin B Solomon; Thomas J Sauer; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 5.482

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.