| Literature DB >> 30944749 |
Luca Guarda-Nardini1, Diletta Trojan2, Giulia Montagner2, Elisa Cogliati2, Matteo Bendini3, Daniele Manfredini4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthritis is a degenerative pathology that may cause pain and dysfunction. Nonsurgical therapy is the traditional treatment of TMJ diseases but if ineffective, TMJ surgery can be performed and may include arthroplasty with interposition of autograft. The encouraging results reported with the use of human amniotic membrane (HAM) in different surgical fields have highlighted its potential, but approaches providing the positioning of HAM within the intra-articular space of arthritic TMJs have never been investigated. CASEEntities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30944749 PMCID: PMC6421772 DOI: 10.1155/2019/6037191
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Case Rep Surg
Figure 1MRI performed in closed (a) and open mouth (b) position during the first visit (T0).
Clinical data collected before each injection (T0-T4) and 15 days after the last injection.
| Parameters | T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | 15 days after the last injection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Masticatory capacity (scores from 0 to 10)∗ | 3 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Chewing-related pain (scores from 0 to 10)∗∗ | ||||||
| min | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| max | 6 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Phonation-related pain (scores from 0 to 10)∗∗ | ||||||
| min | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| max | 8 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Rest-related pain (scores from 0 a 10)∗∗ | ||||||
| min | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| max | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Level of functional limitation§ | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| Efficacy evaluation∗∗∗ | - | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Tolerability evaluation∗∗∗ | - | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Mouth-opening ability | ||||||
| Spontaneous | 23 mm | 23 mm | 30 mm | 33 mm | 25 mm | 25 mm |
| Forced | 23 mm | 42 mm | 35 mm | 33 mm | 25 mm | 27 mm |
| Right laterality | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 mm | 10 mm | 10 mm |
| Protusion | 5 mm | 5 mm | 5 mm | 5 mm | 3 mm | 3 mm |
| Left laterality | 10 mm | 10 mm | 10 mm | 10 mm | 10 mm | 10 mm |
∗Scores from 0 = inability to chew and only the consumption of semiliquid foods is possible to 10 = optimal chewing capacity of any type of food. ∗∗NRS scores from 0 = no pain to 10 = intolerable pain. §0 = none; 1 = tolerable; 2 = moderate; 3 = intense; 4 = serious. ∗∗∗0 = light; 1 = tolerable; 2 = moderate; 3 = good; 4 = excellent.
Figure 2(a–f) condyle remodelling and meniscectomy of TMJ with HAM graft.
Three-month follow-up assessment. Clinical data.
| Parameters | 3 months after surgery |
|---|---|
| Masticatory capacity (scores from 0 to 10)∗ | 8 |
| Chewing-related pain (scores from 0 to 10)∗∗ | |
| min | 0 |
| max | 0 |
| Phonation-related pain (scores from 0 to 10)∗∗ | |
| min | 0 |
| max | 0 |
| Rest-related pain (scores from 0 to 10)∗∗ | |
| min | 0 |
| max | 2 |
| Level of functional limitation§ | 2 |
| Efficacy evaluation∗∗∗ | 3 |
| Tolerability evaluation∗∗∗ | 3 |
| Mouth-opening ability | |
| Spontaneous | 38 mm |
| Forced | 38 mm |
∗Scores from 0 = inability to chew and only the consumption of semiliquid foods is possible to 10 = optimal chewing capacity of any type of food. ∗∗NRS scores from 0 = no pain to 10 = intolerable pain. §0 = none; 1 = tolerable; 2 = moderate; 3 = intense; 4 = serious. ∗∗∗0 = light; 1 = tolerable; 2 = moderate; 3 = good; 4 = excellent.
Figure 3MRI at the five-month follow-up. Closed (a) and open mouth position (b) showing the HAM patch. The HAM patch covers the condyle head; the translation is improved.