| Literature DB >> 30942694 |
Hatan Hisham Mortada1, Yara Aayed Alqahtani1, Hadeel Zakaria Seraj1, Wahbi Khalid Albishi1, Hattan A Aljaaly1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although plastic surgery has been gaining a lot of popularity recently, there seems to be limited perception and a poor understanding of this field by both medical professionals, including medical students, and the general public. This might alter referral patterns as well as medical students' choice to pursue a career in plastic surgery.Entities:
Keywords: Jeddah; King Abdulaziz University; Saudi Arabia; knowledge; media; medical students; perception; plastic surgery
Year: 2019 PMID: 30942694 PMCID: PMC6468330 DOI: 10.2196/12999
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Interact J Med Res ISSN: 1929-073X
Summary of characteristics and responses of participants.
| Characteristics and responses | n (%) | |
| Female | 440 (49.7) | |
| Male | 446 (50.3) | |
| 2nd year | 156 (17.6) | |
| 3rd year | 220 (24.8) | |
| 4th year | 188 (21.2) | |
| 5th year | 95 (10.7) | |
| 6th year | 227 (25.6) | |
| <2.5 | 1 (0.1) | |
| 2.5-2.99 | 7 (0.8) | |
| 3-3.49 | 29 (3.3) | |
| 3.5-3.99 | 103 (11.6) | |
| 4-4.49 | 252 (28.4) | |
| 4.5-5 | 494 (55.8) | |
| No | 325 (36.7) | |
| Yes | 561 (63.3) | |
| No | 648 (73.1) | |
| Yes | 238 (26.9) | |
| Yes | 102 (11.5) | |
| No | 39 (4.4) | |
| Other specialty | 162 (18.3) | |
| Not decided | 583 (65.8) | |
aGPA: grade point average.
Figure 1Specialty preferences among participants.
Achieved scores across various factors.
| Factor | n | Mean score (SD) | P value | |
| <.001a | ||||
| Female | 440 | 9.73 (4.178) | ||
| Male | 446 | 8.30 (4.196) | ||
| <.001a | ||||
| Yes | 561 | 10.01 (4.029) | ||
| No | 325 | 7.29 (4.060) | ||
| <.001a | ||||
| Yes | 238 | 10.42 (4.296) | ||
| No | 648 | 8.49 (4.110) | ||
| .07a | ||||
| Yes | 102 | 9.73 (4.446) | ||
| Other specialty or not determined | 784 | 8.92 (4.213) | ||
| <.001b | ||||
| Yes | 102 | 9.73 (4.446) | ||
| No | 39 | 9.59 (4.278) | ||
| Other specialty | 162 | 10.67 (3.984) | ||
| Not decided | 583 | 8.39 (4.138) | ||
| <.001b | ||||
| 2nd year | 156 | 6.95 (4.011) | ||
| 3rd year | 220 | 8.66 (4.008) | ||
| 4th year | 188 | 8.84 (4.087) | ||
| 5th year | 95 | 10.01 (4.304) | ||
| 6th year | 227 | 10.49 (4.092) | ||
aBy Student t test.
bBy analysis of variance.
Conditions treated in plastic surgery. Frequency refers to the number of students who were aware of the conditions treated in plastic surgery.
| Condition | Frequency, n (%) |
| Burns | 623 (70.3) |
| Rhinoplasty (nose job) | 599 (67.6) |
| Breast reduction or enhancement surgeries | 590 (66.6) |
| Botox | 555 (62.6) |
| Cleft lip and palate (congenital) | 536 (60.5) |
| Eyelid tears and cuts over the face | 483 (54.5) |
| Congenital anomalies of ear and nose | 460 (51.9) |
| Liposuction (fat aspiration) | 456 (51.5) |
| Abdominoplasty (tummy tuck) | 404 (45.6) |
| Fractures of the jaw and face | 402 (45.4) |
| Hair transplantation | 353 (39.8) |
| Sex-change surgery | 352 (39.7) |
| Finger amputations | 229 (25.8) |
| Diabetic foot wounds | 153 (17.3) |
| Fractures of the hand | 123 (13.9) |
| Bedsores | 115 (13.0) |
| Tendon injuries of hand | 109 (12.3) |
| Injuries to nerves of the hands and legs | 107 (12.1) |
Sources of information regarding plastic surgery.
| Source | Frequency, n (%) |
| Internet | 482 (54.4) |
| Television | 396 (44.7) |
| Friends | 316 (35.7) |
| Snapchat | 240 (27.1) |
| 234 (26.4) | |
| Personal encounter | 174 (19.6) |
| 127 (14.3) | |
| Other | 122 (13.8) |
| Teaching sessions | 120 (13.5) |
| Magazines | 87 (9.8) |
| Personal experience | 86 (9.7) |
| Clinical rotations | 81 (9.1) |
| Workplace | 77 (8.7) |
| 26 (2.9) |
Spearman correlation test for the correlation between achieved score and age, educational level, and academic grade point average (N=886).
| Variable | Correlation coefficient ( | |
| Age | 0.182 | <.001 |
| Educational level | 0.267 | <.001 |
| Academic grade point average | 0.025 | .45 |