Literature DB >> 30941526

Inspiratory- and expiratory-gated transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation have different effects on heart rate in healthy subjects: preliminary results.

Bartłomiej Paleczny1,2, Rafał Seredyński3, Beata Ponikowska3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has been considered for the treatment of sympathetically mediated disorders. However, the optimal mode of stimulation is unknown. This study aimed to compare the cardiovascular effects of respiratory-gated taVNS in healthy subjects. <br> METHODS: The examination included expiratory-gated, inspiratory-gated, and non-respiratory-gated taVNS trials. Subjects were examined twice (the order of expiratory- and inspiratory-gated taVNS was changed). taVNS trials started with controlled breathing without stimulation (pre-stimulatory recording) followed by controlled breathing with taVNS (stimulatory recording). Synchronizing taVNS with the respiratory phase was computer-controlled. Heart rate (HR) was calculated from ECG. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) were recorded continuously and noninvasively. Baroreflex sensitivity based on rising (BRS-UP) or falling SBP sequences (BRS-DOWN) or all sequences (BRS-ALL) and heart rate variability (HRV) were analyzed. <br> RESULTS: Seventy-two taVNS trials were obtained from 12 subjects (age 23 ± 3 years). Pre-stimulatory HR correlated with change in HR (r = - 0.25) and SVR (r = 0.24, both p < 0.05). There were no differences between three stimulatory conditions in (1) the changes of hemodynamic parameters, (2) BRS-UP and BRS-ALL, or (3) HRV indices (all p > 0.20). However, in the group of high pre-stimulatory HR trials, HR change differed between inspiratory-gated (0.11 ± 0.53%) and both expiratory-gated (- 1.30 ± 0.58%, p = 0.06) and non-respiratory-gated taVNS (- 1.69 ± 0.65, p = 0.02). BRS-DOWN was higher in inspiratory- vs. non-respiratory-gated taVNS (15.4 ± 1.3 vs. 14.1 ± 0.9 ms/mmHg, p = 0.03). <br> CONCLUSIONS: Expiratory-gated and non-respiratory-gated taVNS exert clear cardioinhibitory effects in healthy subjects with high pre-stimulatory HR, whereas inspiratory-gated taVNS does not affect HR. Cardiac and vascular effects of taVNS depend on pre-stimulatory HR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Baroreflex sensitivity; Respiratory-gated; Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation

Year:  2019        PMID: 30941526     DOI: 10.1007/s10286-019-00604-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Auton Res        ISSN: 0959-9851            Impact factor:   4.435


  19 in total

1.  Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation acutely improves spontaneous cardiac baroreflex sensitivity in healthy young men: A randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Diego Antonino; André L Teixeira; Paulo M Maia-Lopes; Mayara C Souza; Jeann L Sabino-Carvalho; Aaron R Murray; Jim Deuchars; Lauro C Vianna
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 2.  The sympathetic/parasympathetic imbalance in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Authors:  John S Floras; Piotr Ponikowski
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Hypoxic tachycardia is not a result of increased respiratory activity in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Bartłomiej Paleczny; Rafał Seredyński; Stanisław Tubek; Dorota Adamiec; Piotr Ponikowski; Beata Ponikowska
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 2.969

4.  Are EMG and visual observation comparable in determining resting motor threshold? A reexamination after twenty years.

Authors:  Bashar W Badran; Martina Ly; William H DeVries; Chloe E Glusman; Angela Willis; Saxby Pridmore; Mark S George
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Effects of short and prolonged transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation on heart rate variability in healthy subjects.

Authors:  M De Couck; R Cserjesi; R Caers; W P Zijlstra; D Widjaja; N Wolf; O Luminet; J Ellrich; Y Gidron
Journal:  Auton Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.145

6.  Non-invasive Access to the Vagus Nerve Central Projections via Electrical Stimulation of the External Ear: fMRI Evidence in Humans.

Authors:  Eleni Frangos; Jens Ellrich; Barry R Komisaruk
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation in healthy humans reduces sympathetic nerve activity.

Authors:  Jennifer A Clancy; David A Mary; Klaus K Witte; John P Greenwood; Susan A Deuchars; Jim Deuchars
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 8.  The autonomic nervous system as a therapeutic target in heart failure: a scientific position statement from the Translational Research Committee of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Marc van Bilsen; Hitesh C Patel; Johann Bauersachs; Michael Böhm; Martin Borggrefe; Dirk Brutsaert; Andrew J S Coats; Rudolf A de Boer; Gilles W de Keulenaer; Gerasimos S Filippatos; John Floras; Guido Grassi; Ewa A Jankowska; Lilian Kornet; Ida G Lunde; Christoph Maack; Felix Mahfoud; Piero Pollesello; Piotr Ponikowski; Frank Ruschitzka; Hani N Sabbah; Harold D Schultz; Petar Seferovic; Riemer H J A Slart; Peter Taggart; Carlo G Tocchetti; Linda W Van Laake; Faiez Zannad; Stephane Heymans; Alexander R Lyon
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 15.534

9.  Transcutaneous Vagal Nerve Stimulation (tVNS): a new neuromodulation tool in healthy humans?

Authors:  Jelle W R Van Leusden; Roberta Sellaro; Lorenza S Colzato
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-10

Review 10.  Surgically implanted and non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation: a review of efficacy, safety and tolerability.

Authors:  E Ben-Menachem; D Revesz; B J Simon; S Silberstein
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 6.089

View more
  5 in total

1.  High-resolution computational modeling of the current flow in the outer ear during transcutaneous auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS).

Authors:  Erica Kreisberg; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Devin Adair; Niranjan Khadka; Abhishek Datta; Bashar W Badran; J Douglas Bremner; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Transdermal auricular vagus stimulation for the treatment of postural tachycardia syndrome.

Authors:  André Diedrich; Vasile Urechie; Dana Shiffer; Stefano Rigo; Maura Minonzio; Beatrice Cairo; Emily C Smith; Luis E Okamoto; Franca Barbic; Andrea Bisoglio; Alberto Porta; Italo Biaggioni; Raffaello Furlan
Journal:  Auton Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 3.145

Review 3.  Vagus Nerve Stimulation as a Potential Therapy in Early Alzheimer's Disease: A Review.

Authors:  Mariana Vargas-Caballero; Hannah Warming; Robert Walker; Clive Holmes; Garth Cruickshank; Bipin Patel
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.473

Review 4.  International Consensus Based Review and Recommendations for Minimum Reporting Standards in Research on Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (Version 2020).

Authors:  Adam D Farmer; Adam Strzelczyk; Alessandra Finisguerra; Alexander V Gourine; Alireza Gharabaghi; Alkomiet Hasan; Andreas M Burger; Andrés M Jaramillo; Ann Mertens; Arshad Majid; Bart Verkuil; Bashar W Badran; Carlos Ventura-Bort; Charly Gaul; Christian Beste; Christopher M Warren; Daniel S Quintana; Dorothea Hämmerer; Elena Freri; Eleni Frangos; Eleonora Tobaldini; Eugenijus Kaniusas; Felix Rosenow; Fioravante Capone; Fivos Panetsos; Gareth L Ackland; Gaurav Kaithwas; Georgia H O'Leary; Hannah Genheimer; Heidi I L Jacobs; Ilse Van Diest; Jean Schoenen; Jessica Redgrave; Jiliang Fang; Jim Deuchars; Jozsef C Széles; Julian F Thayer; Kaushik More; Kristl Vonck; Laura Steenbergen; Lauro C Vianna; Lisa M McTeague; Mareike Ludwig; Maria G Veldhuizen; Marijke De Couck; Marina Casazza; Marius Keute; Marom Bikson; Marta Andreatta; Martina D'Agostini; Mathias Weymar; Matthew Betts; Matthias Prigge; Michael Kaess; Michael Roden; Michelle Thai; Nathaniel M Schuster; Nicola Montano; Niels Hansen; Nils B Kroemer; Peijing Rong; Rico Fischer; Robert H Howland; Roberta Sclocco; Roberta Sellaro; Ronald G Garcia; Sebastian Bauer; Sofiya Gancheva; Stavros Stavrakis; Stefan Kampusch; Susan A Deuchars; Sven Wehner; Sylvain Laborde; Taras Usichenko; Thomas Polak; Tino Zaehle; Uirassu Borges; Vanessa Teckentrup; Vera K Jandackova; Vitaly Napadow; Julian Koenig
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Closed-Loop Transcutaneous Auricular Vagal Nerve Stimulation: Current Situation and Future Possibilities.

Authors:  Yutian Yu; Jing Ling; Lingling Yu; Pengfei Liu; Min Jiang
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.