BACKGROUND: Despite positive outcomes of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) via the auricular branch of the vagus nerve (ABVN), the mechanisms underlying these outcomes remain unclear. Additionally, previous studies have not been controlled the possible placebo effects of tVNS. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that tVNS acutely improves spontaneous cardiac baroreflex sensitivity (cBRS) and autonomic modulation, and that these effects are specific to stimulation of ABVN. METHODS:Thirteen healthy men (23±1yrs) were randomized across three experimental visits. In active tVNS, electrodes were placed on the tragus of the ear and electrical current was applied by using a Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation device. A time-control visit was performed with the electrodes placed on tragus, but no current was applied (sham-T). Additionally, to avoid a placebo effect, another sham protocol was performed with same electrical current of the active visit, but the electrodes were placed on the ear lobe (an area without cutaneous nerve endings from the vagus - tLS). Beat-to-beat heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) were monitored at rest, during stimulation (active, sham-T and tLS) and recovery. cBRS was measured via sequence technique. Both HR (HRV) and BP variability (BPV) were also measured. RESULTS:Arterial BP and BPV were not affected by any active or sham protocols (P > 0.05). Resting HR and LF/HF ratio of HRV decreased (Δ-3.4 ± 1% and Δ-15 ± 12%, P < 0.05, respectively) and cBRS increased (Δ24 ± 8%, P < 0.05) during active tVNS, but were unchanged during both sham protocols. CONCLUSION:tVNS acutely improves cBRS and autonomic modulation in healthy young men.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Despite positive outcomes of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) via the auricular branch of the vagus nerve (ABVN), the mechanisms underlying these outcomes remain unclear. Additionally, previous studies have not been controlled the possible placebo effects of tVNS. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that tVNS acutely improves spontaneous cardiac baroreflex sensitivity (cBRS) and autonomic modulation, and that these effects are specific to stimulation of ABVN. METHODS: Thirteen healthy men (23±1yrs) were randomized across three experimental visits. In active tVNS, electrodes were placed on the tragus of the ear and electrical current was applied by using a Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation device. A time-control visit was performed with the electrodes placed on tragus, but no current was applied (sham-T). Additionally, to avoid a placebo effect, another sham protocol was performed with same electrical current of the active visit, but the electrodes were placed on the ear lobe (an area without cutaneous nerve endings from the vagus - tLS). Beat-to-beat heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) were monitored at rest, during stimulation (active, sham-T and tLS) and recovery. cBRS was measured via sequence technique. Both HR (HRV) and BP variability (BPV) were also measured. RESULTS: Arterial BP and BPV were not affected by any active or sham protocols (P > 0.05). Resting HR and LF/HF ratio of HRV decreased (Δ-3.4 ± 1% and Δ-15 ± 12%, P < 0.05, respectively) and cBRS increased (Δ24 ± 8%, P < 0.05) during active tVNS, but were unchanged during both sham protocols. CONCLUSION:tVNS acutely improves cBRS and autonomic modulation in healthy young men.
Authors: Roberta Sclocco; Ronald G Garcia; Norman W Kettner; Kylie Isenburg; Harrison P Fisher; Catherine S Hubbard; Ilknur Ay; Jonathan R Polimeni; Jill Goldstein; Nikos Makris; Nicola Toschi; Riccardo Barbieri; Vitaly Napadow Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2019-02-10 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: Roberta Sclocco; Ronald G Garcia; Norman W Kettner; Harrison P Fisher; Kylie Isenburg; Maya Makarovsky; Jessica A Stowell; Jill Goldstein; Riccardo Barbieri; Vitaly Napadow Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2020-03-27 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: André Diedrich; Vasile Urechie; Dana Shiffer; Stefano Rigo; Maura Minonzio; Beatrice Cairo; Emily C Smith; Luis E Okamoto; Franca Barbic; Andrea Bisoglio; Alberto Porta; Italo Biaggioni; Raffaello Furlan Journal: Auton Neurosci Date: 2021-09-29 Impact factor: 3.145
Authors: Gabriel Dias Rodrigues; Jonas Lírio Gurgel; Antonio Claudio Lucas da Nobrega; Pedro Paulo da Silva Soares Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2022-06-18 Impact factor: 3.346
Authors: Helena Dolphin; Tim Dukelow; Ciaran Finucane; Sean Commins; Paul McElwaine; Sean P Kennelly Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2022-06-16 Impact factor: 5.152
Authors: Sahib S Khalsa; Ralph Adolphs; Oliver G Cameron; Hugo D Critchley; Paul W Davenport; Justin S Feinstein; Jamie D Feusner; Sarah N Garfinkel; Richard D Lane; Wolf E Mehling; Alicia E Meuret; Charles B Nemeroff; Stephen Oppenheimer; Frederike H Petzschner; Olga Pollatos; Jamie L Rhudy; Lawrence P Schramm; W Kyle Simmons; Murray B Stein; Klaas E Stephan; Omer Van den Bergh; Ilse Van Diest; Andreas von Leupoldt; Martin P Paulus Journal: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Date: 2017-12-28
Authors: Eugenijus Kaniusas; Stefan Kampusch; Marc Tittgemeyer; Fivos Panetsos; Raquel Fernandez Gines; Michele Papa; Attila Kiss; Bruno Podesser; Antonino Mario Cassara; Emmeric Tanghe; Amine Mohammed Samoudi; Thomas Tarnaud; Wout Joseph; Vaidotas Marozas; Arunas Lukosevicius; Niko Ištuk; Antonio Šarolić; Sarah Lechner; Wlodzimierz Klonowski; Giedrius Varoneckas; Jozsef Constantin Széles Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2019-08-09 Impact factor: 4.677