Eleni Frangos1, Jens Ellrich2, Barry R Komisaruk3. 1. Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, 101 Warren St, Newark, NJ 07102, USA. Electronic address: frangos.eleni@gmail.com. 2. Cerbomed GmbH, Henkestrasse 91, 91052 Erlangen, Germany; Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7D2, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark; Institute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitaetsstrasse 17, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany. 3. Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, 101 Warren St, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tract-tracing studies in cats and rats demonstrated that the auricular branch of the vagus nerve (ABVN) projects to the nucleus tractus solitarii (NTS); it has remained unclear as to whether or not the ABVN projects to the NTS in humans. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether non-invasive electrical stimulation of the cymba conchae, a region of the external ear exclusively innervated by the ABVN, activates the NTS and the "classical" central vagal projections in humans. METHODS: Twelve healthy adults underwent two fMRI scans in the same session. Electrical stimulation (continuous 0.25ms pulses, 25Hz) was applied to the earlobe (control, scan #1) and left cymba conchae (scan #2). Statistical analyses were performed with FSL. Two region-of-interest analyses were performed to test the effects of cymba conchae stimulation (compared to baseline and control, earlobe, stimulation) on the central vagal projections (corrected; brainstem P < 0.01, forebrain P < 0.05), followed by a whole-brain analysis (corrected, P < 0.05). RESULTS: Cymba conchae stimulation, compared to earlobe (control) stimulation, produced significant activation of the "classical" central vagal projections, e.g., widespread activity in the ipsilateral NTS, bilateral spinal trigeminal nucleus, dorsal raphe, locus coeruleus, and contralateral parabrachial area, amygdala, and nucleus accumbens. Bilateral activation of the paracentral lobule was also observed. Deactivations were observed bilaterally in the hippocampus and hypothalamus. CONCLUSION: These findings provide evidence in humans that the central projections of the ABVN are consistent with the "classical" central vagal projections and can be accessed non-invasively via the external ear.
BACKGROUND: Tract-tracing studies in cats and rats demonstrated that the auricular branch of the vagus nerve (ABVN) projects to the nucleus tractus solitarii (NTS); it has remained unclear as to whether or not the ABVN projects to the NTS in humans. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether non-invasive electrical stimulation of the cymba conchae, a region of the external ear exclusively innervated by the ABVN, activates the NTS and the "classical" central vagal projections in humans. METHODS: Twelve healthy adults underwent two fMRI scans in the same session. Electrical stimulation (continuous 0.25ms pulses, 25Hz) was applied to the earlobe (control, scan #1) and left cymba conchae (scan #2). Statistical analyses were performed with FSL. Two region-of-interest analyses were performed to test the effects of cymba conchae stimulation (compared to baseline and control, earlobe, stimulation) on the central vagal projections (corrected; brainstem P < 0.01, forebrain P < 0.05), followed by a whole-brain analysis (corrected, P < 0.05). RESULTS:Cymba conchae stimulation, compared to earlobe (control) stimulation, produced significant activation of the "classical" central vagal projections, e.g., widespread activity in the ipsilateral NTS, bilateral spinal trigeminal nucleus, dorsal raphe, locus coeruleus, and contralateral parabrachial area, amygdala, and nucleus accumbens. Bilateral activation of the paracentral lobule was also observed. Deactivations were observed bilaterally in the hippocampus and hypothalamus. CONCLUSION: These findings provide evidence in humans that the central projections of the ABVN are consistent with the "classical" central vagal projections and can be accessed non-invasively via the external ear.
Authors: Stefan Dietrich; James Smith; Charlotte Scherzinger; Karina Hofmann-Preiss; Timo Freitag; Alexander Eisenkolb; Ralf Ringler Journal: Biomed Tech (Berl) Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 1.411
Authors: Hermann Stefan; Gernot Kreiselmeyer; Frank Kerling; Katrin Kurzbuch; Christophe Rauch; Marcel Heers; Burkhard S Kasper; Thilo Hammen; Martina Rzonsa; Elisabeth Pauli; Jens Ellrich; Wolfgang Graf; Rüdiger Hopfengärtner Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Vitaly Napadow; Robert R Edwards; Christine M Cahalan; George Mensing; Seth Greenbaum; Assia Valovska; Ang Li; Jieun Kim; Yumi Maeda; Kyungmo Park; Ajay D Wasan Journal: Pain Med Date: 2012-05-08 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Roberta Sclocco; Ronald G Garcia; Norman W Kettner; Kylie Isenburg; Harrison P Fisher; Catherine S Hubbard; Ilknur Ay; Jonathan R Polimeni; Jill Goldstein; Nikos Makris; Nicola Toschi; Riccardo Barbieri; Vitaly Napadow Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2019-02-10 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: Matthew K Leonard; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Fernando Llanos; Jacie R McHaney; William L Schuerman; Han G Yi Journal: NPJ Sci Learn Date: 2020-08-06
Authors: Yuan Yuan; Xiao Liu; Juyi Wan; Johnson Wong; Amanda A Bedwell; Scott A Persohn; Changyu Shen; Michael C Fishbein; Lan S Chen; Zhenhui Chen; Thomas H Everett; Paul R Territo; Peng-Sheng Chen Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2019-05-29 Impact factor: 6.343