Literature DB >> 23570709

The digital MIQE guidelines: Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Digital PCR Experiments.

Jim F Huggett1, Carole A Foy, Vladimir Benes, Kerry Emslie, Jeremy A Garson, Ross Haynes, Jan Hellemans, Mikael Kubista, Reinhold D Mueller, Tania Nolan, Michael W Pfaffl, Gregory L Shipley, Jo Vandesompele, Carl T Wittwer, Stephen A Bustin.   

Abstract

There is growing interest in digital PCR (dPCR) because technological progress makes it a practical and increasingly affordable technology. dPCR allows the precise quantification of nucleic acids, facilitating the measurement of small percentage differences and quantification of rare variants. dPCR may also be more reproducible and less susceptible to inhibition than quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). Consequently, dPCR has the potential to have a substantial impact on research as well as diagnostic applications. However, as with qPCR, the ability to perform robust meaningful experiments requires careful design and adequate controls. To assist independent evaluation of experimental data, comprehensive disclosure of all relevant experimental details is required. To facilitate this process we present the Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Digital PCR Experiments guidelines. This report addresses known requirements for dPCR that have already been identified during this early stage of its development and commercial implementation. Adoption of these guidelines by the scientific community will help to standardize experimental protocols, maximize efficient utilization of resources, and enhance the impact of this promising new technology.
© 2013 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23570709     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2013.206375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  261 in total

1.  Lack of correlation between reaction speed and analytical sensitivity in isothermal amplification reveals the value of digital methods for optimization: validation using digital real-time RT-LAMP.

Authors:  Eugenia M Khorosheva; Mikhail A Karymov; David A Selck; Rustem F Ismagilov
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  MicroRNAs as potential liquid biopsy biomarkers in colorectal cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Yuji Toiyama; Yoshinaga Okugawa; James Fleshman; C Richard Boland; Ajay Goel
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 10.680

3.  Robust Multiplexed Clustering and Denoising of Digital PCR Assays by Data Gridding.

Authors:  Billy T Lau; Christina Wood-Bouwens; Hanlee P Ji
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Digital Quantification of DNA Replication and Chromosome Segregation Enables Determination of Antimicrobial Susceptibility after only 15 Minutes of Antibiotic Exposure.

Authors:  Nathan G Schoepp; Eugenia M Khorosheva; Travis S Schlappi; Matthew S Curtis; Romney M Humphries; Janet A Hindler; Rustem F Ismagilov
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 15.336

5.  Human islet preparations distributed for research exhibit a variety of insulin-secretory profiles.

Authors:  Nora S Kayton; Gregory Poffenberger; Joseph Henske; Chunhua Dai; Courtney Thompson; Radhika Aramandla; Alena Shostak; Wendell Nicholson; Marcela Brissova; William S Bush; Alvin C Powers
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 4.310

6.  Measurement of absolute copy number variation of Glutathione S-Transferase M1 gene by digital droplet PCR and association analysis in Tunisian Rheumatoid Arthritis population.

Authors:  Yosser Achour; Mohamed Sahbi Ben Kilani; Mariem Ben Hamad; Sameh Marzouk; Nadia Mahfoudh; Zouheir Bahloul; Leila Keskes; Elisabeth Petit-Teixeira; Abdellatif Maalej
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 2.352

7.  Comparison of Quantitative PCR and Droplet Digital PCR Multiplex Assays for Two Genera of Bloom-Forming Cyanobacteria, Cylindrospermopsis and Microcystis.

Authors:  Shu Harn Te; Enid Yingru Chen; Karina Yew-Hoong Gin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Efficacy of intermittent combined RAF and MEK inhibition in a patient with concurrent BRAF- and NRAS-mutant malignancies.

Authors:  Omar Abdel-Wahab; Virginia M Klimek; Alisa A Gaskell; Agnes Viale; Donavan Cheng; Eunhee Kim; Raajit Rampal; Mark Bluth; James J Harding; Margaret K Callahan; Taha Merghoub; Michael F Berger; David B Solit; Neal Rosen; Ross L Levine; Paul B Chapman
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 39.397

9.  Comparison of the Amplification Refractory Mutation System, Super Amplification Refractory Mutation System, and Droplet Digital PCR for T790 M Mutation Detection in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer after Failure of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment.

Authors:  Lucheng Zhu; Shirong Zhang; Yanping Xun; Yanping Jiang; Bing Xia; Xueqin Chen; Limin Wang; Hong Jiang; Shenglin Ma
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2017-09-03       Impact factor: 3.201

10.  Denaturation-Enhanced Droplet Digital PCR for Liquid Biopsies.

Authors:  Mariana Fitarelli-Kiehl; Fangyan Yu; Ravina Ashtaputre; Ka Wai Leong; Ioannis Ladas; Julianna Supplee; Cloud Paweletz; Devarati Mitra; Jonathan D Schoenfeld; Sareh Parangi; G Mike Makrigiorgos
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 8.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.