| Literature DB >> 30934777 |
Mengying Wei1,2, Yuanyuan Liu3, Zifeng Pi4, Shizhe Li5, Mingxin Hu6, Yang He7, Kexin Yue8, Tianshu Liu9, Zhiqiang Liu10, Fengrui Song11, Zhongying Liu12.
Abstract
Lignans from Schisandra chinensis (Turcz.) Baill can ameliorate cognitive impairment in animals with Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the metabolism of absorbed ingredients and the potential targets of the lignans from S. chinensis in animals with AD have not been systematically investigated. Therefore, for the first time, we performed an in-vivo ingredient analysis and implemented a target-network pharmacology strategy to assess the effects of lignans from S. chinensis in rats with AD. Ten absorbed prototype constituents and 39 metabolites were identified or tentatively characterized in the plasma of dosed rats with AD using ultra high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Based on the results of analysis of the effective constituents in vivo, the potential therapeutic mechanism of the effective constituents in the rats with AD was investigated using a target-network pharmacology approach and independent experimental validation. The results showed that the treatment effects of lignans from S. chinensis on cognitive impairment might involve the regulation of amyloid precursor protein metabolism, neurofibrillary tangles, neurotransmitter metabolism, inflammatory response, and antioxidant system. Overall, we identified the effective components of lignans in S. chinensis that can improve the cognitive impairment induced by AD and proposed potential therapeutic metabolic pathways. The results might serve as the basis for a fundamental strategy to explore effective therapeutic drugs to treat AD.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; Schisandra chinensis; UHPLC–Q-TOF-MS; lignan; metabolite identification; target-network pharmacology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30934777 PMCID: PMC6480032 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24071203
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Absorbed prototype constituents in dosed Alzheimer’s disease (AD) rat plasma.
| No. | Parent Compound | Rt (min) | Measured Mass | Formula | Time Points (min) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | Schisandrin a | 2.17 | 433.2210 | C24H32O7 | 30, 60, 120 |
| P2 | Gomisin D | 2.37 | 553.2228 | C28H34O10 | 30, 60, 120, 360, 480 |
| P3 | Schisandrol B a | 2.55 | 439.1723 | C23H28O7 | 30, 60, 120 |
| P4 | Benzoylgomisin H | 3.12 | 523.2281 | C30H34O8 | 60, 120, 360 |
| P5 | Angeloylgomisin Q | 3.51 | 553.2417 | C29H38O9 | 30, 60, 120 |
| P6 | Gomisin G | 4.08 | 537.2090 | C30H32O9 | 30, 60, 120, 360, 480 |
| P7 | Gomisin K | 4.19 | 403.2094 | C23H30O6 | 30, 60, 120, 360 |
| P8 | Gomisin E | 4.54 | 515.2264 | C28H34O9 | 30, 60, 120, 360, 480 |
| P9 | Deoxyschizandrin a | 6.84 | 417.2258 | C24H32O6 | 30, 60, 120, 360, 480 |
| P10 | Schisandrin B a | 10.21 | 401.1948 | C23H28O6 | 30, 60, 120, 360, 480 |
a Compounds were compared with the reference compounds.
Figure 1Chemical structure of deoxyschizandrin.
Summary of the lignan metabolites in S. chinensis in the plasma of dosed rats with Alzheimer’s disease.
| Name | Metabolic Pathways | RT (min) | Measured Mass | Formula | Mass Error (ppm) | Time Points (min) | MS2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schisandrin a | 2.17 | 433.2210 | C24H32O7 | −2.4 | 30, 60, 120 | ||
| M1 | Hydroxylation+demethylation | 1.46 | 457.1823 | C23H30O8 | −2 | 30, 60, 120, 360, 480 | 399, 385, 354, 367 |
| M2 | 2 × Demethylation | 1.48 | 427.1695 | C22H28O7 | 1.48 | 60, 360 | 387, 385, 354 |
| M3 | Hydroxylation | 1.7 | 449.2158 | C24H32O8 | −2.6 | 30, 60, 120, 360, 480 | 413, 359,383 |
| M4 | Demethylation | 1.74 | 419.2054 | C23H30O7 | −2.4 | 30, 60, 120, 360 | 401, 373, 370, 359 |
| M5 | Phosphorylation | 1.99 | 513.1912 | C24H33O10P | 5.5 | 360, 480 | 415, 384, 385,373 |
| M6 | 2 × Demethylation+dehydration | 5.2 | 387.1786 | C22H26O6 | −3.9 | 30, 60, 120, 360, 480 | 385, 354, 338, 323 |
| Schisandrol B a | 2.54 | 439.1737 | C23H28O7 | 2.2 | 30, 60, 120 | ||
| M7 | 2 × Demethylation | 1.46 | 389.1594 | C21H24O7 | 0.2 | 30, 60, 120, 360, 480 | 355, 322, 294 |
| M8 | Reduction+demethylation | 1.48 | 427.1695 | C22H28O7 | −7.5 | 60, 360 | 387, 331, 345 |
| M9 (Schisandrin) | Reduction+methylation | 2.17 | 433.2210 | C24H32O7 | −2.4 | 30, 60, 120 | 415, 400, 385, 384, 373, 369, 359, 354, 353, 338, 322 |
| M10 | CH2O (cleavage)+dehydration | 2.54 | 369.1673 | C22H24O5 | −6.4 | 30, 60, 120 | 353, 337, 264 |
| M11 | Reduction+dehydration | 3.12 | 401.1923 | C23H28O6 | −9 | 360 | 370, 345, 359, 386 |
| M12 | Reduction + dehydration + demethylation | 5.2 | 387.1786 | C22H26O6 | −4.1 | 30, 60, 120, 360, 480 | 331, 345 |
| Angeloylgomisin Q | 3.51 | 553.2417 | C29H38O9 | 1.7 | 30, 60, 120 | ||
| M9 (Schisandrin) | C5H6O2 (cleavage) | 2.17 | 433.2210 | C24H32O7 | −2.4 | 30, 60, 120 | 415, 400, 385, 384 |
| M13 | Demethylation | 2.27 | 539.2239 | C28H36O9 | −2.2 | 30, 60, 120 | 417, 399, 389, 387, 369 |
| Gomisin G | 4.08 | 537.2090 | C30H32O9 | −5.4 | 30, 60, 120, 360, 480 | ||
| M14 | C7H4O2(cleavage) + 2 × demethylation | 1.46 | 389.1594 | C21H24O7 | 0.2 | 30, 60, 120, 360, 480 | 371, 356, 340 |
| M15 | Demethylation | 3.62 | 523.1932 | C29H30O9 | −5.7 | 30, 120, 360 | 401, 383, 369, 357, |
| Gomisin D | 2.37 | 531.2228 | C28H34O10 | 0.7 | 30, 60, 120, 360, 480 | ||
| M16 | C6H8O3(cleavage) + reduction | 1.48 | 427.1695 | C22H28O7 | −7.6 | 60, 360, 480 | 387, 359, 355 |
| M17 | Reduction | 1.6 | 555.2165 | C28H36O10 | −6.5 | 30, 60, 120, 360, 480 | 485, 383, 352, 351, 341 |
| M18 | C6H8O3(cleavage) | 1.63 | 425.1545 | C22H26O7 | −5.9 | 360, 480 | 385, 355, 353 |
| M19 | Demethylation | 1.81 | 539.1884 | C27H32O10 | −0.5 | 360, 480 | 387, 368, 357 |
| M20 | C6H8O2(cleavage) | 2.3 | 419.1666 | C22H26O8 | −8.3 | 30, 360 | 401, 383, 371, 351 |
| M21 | C6H8O3(cleavage) + dehydration | 2.35 | 385.1629 | C22H24O6 | −4.3 | 30, 60, 120, 360, 480 | 355, 353 |
| M22 | C6H8O2(cleavage) + reduction | 2.36 | 443.1699 | C22H28O8 | 5.1 | 60, 120, 360, 480 | 403, 385, 357, 351 |
| M23 | Phosphorylation | 3.62 | 611.1859 | C28H35O13P | −4.8 | 60, 120, 360, 480 | 383, 371, 351 |
| Gomisin E | 4.54 | 515.2264 | C28H34O9 | −2.2 | 30, 60, 120, 360, 480 | ||
| M24 | C6H8O2(cleavage) | 1.73 | 403.1761 | C22H26O7 | 2.5 | 120 | 385, 355, 354, 353, 343 |
| M25 | Decarboxylation | 2.21 | 471.2388 | C27H34O7 | 2.2 | 360, 480 | 385, 355, 354, 353, 343 |
| M26 | Reduction | 2.27 | 539.2239 | C28H36O9 | −2.4 | 30, 60, 120 | 469, 355, 354, 353, 343, 329 |
| M27 | Hydration | 4.77 | 555.2166 | C28H36O10 | −6.4 | 60, 360 | 385, 355, 354, 343 |
| Benzoylgomisin H | 3.12 | 523.2281 | C30H34O8 | −8.7 | 60, 120, 360 | ||
| M28 | C7H4O(cleavage) | 1.73 | 419.2061 | C23H30O7 | −0.6 | 30, 60, 120 | 401, 385, 316 |
| Gomisin K | 4.19 | 403.2094 | C23H30O6 | −5.3 | 30, 60, 120, 360 | ||
| M29 | Hydroxylation + demethylation | 1.48 | 427.1695 | C22H28O7 | −7.3 | 60 | 387, 372, 355, 333, 302 |
| M30 | Demethylation | 1.72 | 389.1934 | C22H28O6 | −6.3 | 30, 60 | 374, 357, 333, 302 |
| M31 | Hydroxylation | 1.73 | 419.2061 | C23H30O7 | −0.8 | 30, 60, 120, 360 | 401, 386, 369, 333, 302 |
| M32 | 2×Desaturation + acetyl cysteine conjugation | 1.75 | 590.2380 | C28H41NO9S | −2.6 | 30, 60, 120, 360, 480 | 389, 373, 359, 319 |
| Deoxyschizandrin a | 6.84 | 417.2258 | C24H32O6 | −3.2 | 30, 60, 120, 360, 480 | ||
| M9 (Schisandrin) | Hydroxylation | 2.18 | 433.2210 | C24H32O7 | −2.4 | 30, 60, 120 | 415, 400, 385, 384, 373, 369, 359, 354, 353, 338, 322 |
| M28 | Demethylation + hydroxylation | 1.73 | 419.2061 | C23H30O7 | −0.6 | 30, 60, 120 | 401, 370, 369, 337 |
| M33 | Demethylation | 4.65 | 403.2093 | C23H30O6 | −5.3 | 30, 60, 120, 360, 480 | 388, 385, 372, 371, 370, 339 |
| M34 | 2 × Hydroxylation | 1.7 | 449.2154 | C24H32O8 | −3.5 | 30, 60, 120, 360, 480 | 431, 413, 398, 383, 343, 316 |
| M35 | 2 × Desaturation | 3.48 | 413.1944 | C24H28O6 | −3.6 | 60, 120, 360, 480 | 398, 383, 382, 366, 347, 316 |
| Schisandrin B a | 10.21 | 401.1948 | C23H28O6 | −2.7 | 30, 60, 120, 360, 480 | ||
| M36 | Reduction + phosphorylation | 1.68 | 483.1799 | C23H31O9P | 4.1 | 30, 60, 120, 360 | 387 |
| M37 | Demethylation + phosphorylation | 1.81 | 467.1488 | C22H27O9P | 4.8 | 60 | 370, 371,300 |
| M38 (Schisandrol B) | Hydroxylation | 2.54 | 439.1737 | C23H28O7 | 2.2 | 30, 60, 120 | 399, 384, 369, 368, 357, 353, 343, 341, 337, 338, 295 |
| M39 (Deoxyschizandrin) | Reduction + methylation | 6.84 | 417.2258 | C24H32O6 | −3.2 | 30, 60, 120, 360, 480 | 402, 386, 370, 371, 355, 347, 332, 316 |
a Compounds were compared with the reference compounds.
Figure 2Proposed metabolic pathways of schisandrin, schisandrol B, angeloylgomisin Q, and gomisin G in the plasma of dosed rats with Alzheimer’s disease.
Figure 3Proposed metabolic pathways of gomisin D and gomisin E in the plasma of dosed rats with Alzheimer’s disease.
Figure 4Proposed metabolic pathways of benzoylgomisin H, gomisin K, deoxyschizandrin, and schisandrin B in the plasma of dosed rats with Alzheimer’s disease.
The relative potential targets induced by lignans in S. chinensis.
| Target Gene | Pathway | Relative Target | Relative Pathway | Effective Constituents |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AChE | Cholinergic synapse | APP | amyloid precursor protein metabolism | Gomisin K; Gomisin G |
| iNOS | Arginine and proline metabolism | Neurotransmitter; Calmodulin; IL | Nitric oxide anabolism; calmodulin binding; neurotransmitter metabolism; inflammatory response | Gomisin K |
| PTGS1 | Arachidonic acid metabolism | PGs | Platelet activation; Cytochrome P450 - arranged by substrate type | Gomisin K |
| PTGS2 | Arachidonic acid metabolism | PGs | inflammatory response; Cytokine signaling in immune system | Gomisin K; Benzoylgomisin H; Schisandrol B; Gomisin D |
| GSK3β | PI3K-Akt signaling pathway; Wnt signaling pathway | Tau; DA | MAPK signaling pathway; Dopaminergic synapse; neurofibrillary tangles | Gomisin K |
| TGFB1 | MAPK signaling pathway | TNF-α | TNF signaling pathway | Schisandrin B |
| MAPK1 | MAPK signaling pathway | Glu; ACh; 5-HT | Glutamatergic synapse; Cholinergic synapse; Serotonergic synapse | Schisandrin B |
| MAPK3 | MAPK signaling pathway | Glu; ACh; 5-HT | Glutamatergic synapse; Cholinergic synapse; Serotonergic synapse | Schisandrin B |
| TBXAS1 | Cytochrome P450 - arranged by substrate type | AA | Arachidonic acid metabolism; Platelet activation | Schisandrin B |
| CYP3A4 | Drug metabolism - cytochrome P450 | Cholesterol; LA; Retinoate | Steroid hormone biosynthesis; Linoleic acid metabolism; Retinol metabolism | Schisandrin B |
| PPARG | PPAR signaling pathway | 9-CRA | Lipid metabolism; | Gomisin K |
| TOP2 | Metabolism of proteins | / | Cell cycle | Gomisin K; Angeloylgomisin Q; Benzoylgomisin H; Schisandrol B; Gomisin D; Gomisin G |
| Mir34a | MicroRNAs in cancer | Cyclin-dependent | Cell cycle | Schisandrin B |
| CCND1 | Cyclins and cell cycle regulation | / | / | Schisandrin B |
| GSR | Glutathione metabolism | GSH | Glutathione metabolism; | Schisandrin B |
| NFE2L2 | Protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum | HMOX1 | Porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism | Schisandrin B; Deoxyschizandrin |
| HMOX1 | Porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism | APP; IL-10; NFE2L2 | amyloid precursor protein metabolism; Protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum;Cytokine signaling in immune system | Schisandrin |
Figure 5Absorbed effective constituent–target–disease network induced by the absorbed effective constituents of lignans from S. chinensis. The purple cycle indicates the absorbed effective constituents of lignans from S. chinensis, the yellow cycle is the common targets that contact the absorbed constituents and AD, the green cycle is the relative targets of AD and absorbed effective constituents, the blue cycle is the representative targets only related to AD, and the pink cycle is the targets only related to absorbed effective constituents; nodes represent for genes, proteins, endogenous compounds, and metabolic pathways.
Figure 6Effects of lignans from S. chinensis on the protein expression level of Aβ (a) and p-tau (b) and number of neurons (c) in the hippocampus of rats with AD. Notes: n = 10, per group; the data are expressed as mean ± SEM; compared with the normal control group (NG) by a t-test, ## P < 0.01; compared with the AD model group (MG), ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05.
Figure 7Effect of lignans from S. chinensis on the activity of γ-secretase, β-secretase, and GSK3β in the rat plasma. The box limits are in the 25th and 75th percentiles; the median is indicated by the horizontal bar; the whiskers are in the 1.5 interquartile ranges; the horizontal boundaries of the boxes represent the interquartile range and the black solid circle is the mean; data not included between the whiskers are plotted as an empty circle. Notes: n =10, per group; compared with NG by a t-test, ### P < 0.001; compared with MG, *** P < 0.001.
Figure 8Effect of lignans from S. chinensis on the levels of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), arachidonic acid (AA), linoleic acid (LA), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), heme oxygenase 1 (HMOX1), glutathione (GSH), malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT), nitric oxide (NO), and nitric oxide synthase (NOS) in the rat plasma. The box limits are in the 25th and 75th percentiles; the median is indicated by the horizontal bar; the whiskers are in the 1.5 interquartile ranges; the horizontal boundaries of the boxes represent the interquartile range and the black solid circle is the mean; data not included between the whiskers are plotted as an empty circle. Notes: n = 10, per group; compared with NG by a t-test, ### P < 0.001, ## P < 0.01, # P < 0.05; compared with MG, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05.
Figure 9Effect of lignans from S. chinensis on the level of Glu, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), aspartic acid (Asp), glycine (Gly), norepinephrine (NE), 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), taurine, dopamine (DA), acetylcholine (ACh), and acetyl cholinesterase (AChE) in the plasma of rats with AD. The box limits are in the 25th and 75th percentiles; the median is indicated by the horizontal bar; the whiskers are in the 1.5 interquartile ranges; the horizontal boundaries of the boxes represent the interquartile range and the black solid circle is the mean; data not included between the whiskers are plotted as an empty circle. Notes: n = 10, per group; compared with NG by a t-test, ### P < 0.001; compared with MG, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01.
Figure 10Effect of lignans from S. chinensis on the level of cholesterol sulfate and 9-cis-retinoic acid (9-CRA) in the plasma of rats with AD. The box limits are in the 25th and 75th percentiles; the median is indicated by the horizontal bar; the whiskers are in the 1.5 interquartile ranges; the horizontal boundaries of the boxes represent the interquartile range and the black solid circle is the mean; data not included between the whiskers are plotted as an empty circle. Notes: n = 10, per group; compared with NG, ### P < 0.001.
Changes in the main groups in the metabolic pathways of lignans from S. chinensis.
| Description | Formula | Delta Mass (Da) | Classifier |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | / | / | / |
| Methylation | +CH2 | 14.0157 | Phase II |
| Demethylation | –CH2 | −14.0157 | Phase I |
| Reduction | +H2 | 2.0157 | Phase I |
| Desaturation | –H2 | −2.0157 | Phase I |
| 2×Desaturation | –H4 | −4.0313 | Phase I |
| Hydroxylation | +O | 15.9949 | Phase I |
| 2×Hydroxylation | +O2 | 31.9898 | Phase I |
| 3×Hydroxylation | +O3 | 47.9847 | Phase I |
| Nitro reduction | –O2+H2 | −29.9742 | Phase I |
| Dehydration | –H2O | −18.0106 | Phase I, II |
| Hydration | +H2O | 18.0106 | Phase I |
| Dihydrodiol formation | +H2O2 | 34.0055 | Phase I |
| Decarbonylation | –-CO | −27.9949 | Phase I |
| Formylation | +CO | 27.9949 | Phase II |
| Decarboxylation | –COO | −43.9898 | Phase I |
| Phosphorylation | +HPO3 | 79.9663 | Phase II |
| Acetyl cysteine conjugation | +C5H7NO3S | 161.0147 | Phase II |
| 2 × Glucuronide conjugation | +C12H16O12 | 352.0642 | Phase II |
| Glucuronidation | +C6H8O6 | 176.0321 | Phase II |
Multiple reaction monitoring-optimized parameters for quantitation in rat plasma.
| Mode | Compounds | Capillary Voltage (kV) | Nebulizer Gas (L/h) | Desolvation Gas (L/h) | Cone Voltage (V) | Quantitation Transition ( | Confirmation Transition ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESI+ | Gly | 2.5 | 50 | 800 | 14 | 75.97 > 30.19 (8) | 75.97 > 48.14 (6) |
| Asp | 2.5 | 50 | 800 | 12 | 133.97 > 74.03 (14) | 133.97 > 88.07 (10) | |
| Glu | 2.5 | 50 | 800 | 14 | 147.97 > 84.11 (16) | 147.97 > 130.03 (8) | |
| GABA | 2.5 | 50 | 800 | 20 | 103.97 > 86.99 (10) | 103.97 > 68.03 (14) | |
| NE | 2.5 | 50 | 800 | 6 | 169.97 > 152.04 (8) | 169.97 > 107.3 (18) | |
| ACh | 2.5 | 50 | 800 | 22 | 146.03 > 87.04 (12) | 146.01 > 60.11 (10) | |
| DA | 2.5 | 50 | 800 | 12 | 153.97 > 137 (10) | 153.97 > 91.08 (22) | |
| 5-HT | 2.5 | 50 | 800 | 10 | 176.97 > 160.02 (8) | 176.97 > 132.06 (20) | |
| 9-CRA | 3 | 40 | 500 | 20 | 301.29 > 123.17 (22) | 301.29 > 161.40 (22) | |
| ESI− | AA | 2.6 | 50 | 650 | 32 | 303.35 > 259.29 (12) | 303.35 > 205.21 (16) |
| LA | 2.8 | 40 | 500 | 36 | 279.35 > 261.23 (18) | 279.35 > 59.13 (18) | |
| cholesterol sulfate | 2.6 | 50 | 650 | 62 | 465.48 > 97.03 (36) | 465.48 > 80.00 (80) |