Literature DB >> 30931417

Pneumatic Retinopexy Experience and Outcomes of Vitreoretinal Fellows in the United States: A Multicenter Study.

Parisa Emami-Naeini1, Jordan Deaner2, Ferhina Ali2, Priyanka Gogte3, Richard Kaplan4, Kevin C Chen5, Eric Nudleman5, Dilraj S Grewal6, Meenakashi Gupta4, Jeremy D Wolfe3, Michael Klufas2, Glenn Yiu1.   

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing pneumatic retinopexy (PR) performed by vitreoretinal fellows at 6 academic centers in the United States. Design: Retrospective, multicenter, consecutive case series. Participants: 483 patients with primary retinal detachments who underwent PR by 49 vitreoretinal fellows from 6 U.S. training sites between 2002 and 2016.
Methods: We reviewed medical records of patients and recorded baseline clinical characteristics (age, sex, baseline visual acuity, lens status, presence of lattice degeneration, presence of vitreous hemorrhage, location of retinal breaks, macular status, and size of detachment), visual and anatomic outcomes at 3-months after PR, as well as training level and PR experience of the fellow at the time of the procedure. Main Outcome Measures: Single-procedure anatomic success and visual acuity at 3-months follow-up, and association with clinical and training-related factors.
Results: Vitreoretinal fellows performed a variable number of PR, with a median of 7 cases per fellow (range 1-24). Single-procedure anatomic success was 66.8%, and mean LogMAR visual outcome was 0.43 (Snellen equivalent 20/54) at 3 months. Factors that were independently associated with single-procedure success include phakic lens status (P = 0.01), smaller size of retinal detachment (P = 0.02), and the fellow's procedure experience (P = 0.01). The only factor associated with worse visual outcome was baseline visual acuity (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Vitreoretinal fellows perform variably few pneumatic retinopexies but have outcomes comparable to reported rates by experienced specialists. Procedure experience of individual fellows may impact anatomic outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30931417      PMCID: PMC6435286          DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2018.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmol Retina        ISSN: 2468-6530


  9 in total

1.  Regional practice patterns for retinal detachment repair in the United States.

Authors:  John C Hwang
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 2.  Pneumatic retinopexy for the repair of retinal detachments: a comprehensive review (1986-2007).

Authors:  Clement K Chan; Steven G Lin; Asha S D Nuthi; David M Salib
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.048

3.  Trends in Vitreoretinal Procedures for Medicare Beneficiaries, 2000 to 2014.

Authors:  Michael D McLaughlin; John C Hwang
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Expanded criteria for pneumatic retinopexy and potential cost savings.

Authors:  Darin R Goldman; Chirag P Shah; Jeffrey S Heier
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Pneumatic retinopexy: the evolution of case selection and surgical technique. A twelve-year study of 302 eyes.

Authors:  P E Tornambe
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1997

6.  Outcomes after Failed Pneumatic Retinopexy for Retinal Detachment.

Authors:  Joseph A Anaya; Chirag P Shah; Jeffrey S Heier; Michael G Morley
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Pneumatic retinopexy: success rate and complications.

Authors:  A A Zaidi; R Alvarado; A Irvine
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Current visual and anatomic outcomes of pneumatic retinopexy.

Authors:  Kaushal M Kulkarni; Daniel B Roth; Jonathan L Prenner
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.256

9.  Bridging the gap: a five stage approach for developing specialty-specific entrustable professional activities.

Authors:  James Kwan; Roslyn Crampton; Lise L Mogensen; Roslyn Weaver; Cees P M van der Vleuten; Wendy C Y Hu
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.463

  9 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Vitreous function and intervention of it with vitrectomy and other modalities.

Authors:  Yao Zong; Qian-Ying Gao; Yan-Nian Hui
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Vitreous function and intervention of it with vitrectomy and other modalities.

Authors:  Yao Zong; Qian-Ying Gao; Yan-Nian Hui
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 1.645

3.  Pars Plana Vitrectomy Outcomes for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Qualifying for Pneumatic Retinopexy.

Authors:  Philip Kurochkin; Natalie Huang; Redion Petrela; Kevin I Rosenberg; Jamin S Brown; Patrick Oellers
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-19

4.  Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on characteristics of retinal detachments: the Canadian experience.

Authors:  Parnian Arjmand; Fahmeeda Murtaza; Arshia Eshtiaghi; Marko M Popovic; Peter J Kertes; Kenneth T Eng
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-26       Impact factor: 1.882

5.  Clinical Outcomes of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Treated With Pneumatic Retinopexy.

Authors:  Nicolas A Yannuzzi; Charles Li; Danielle Fujino; Scott P Kelly; Flora Lum; Harry W Flynn; D Wilkin Parke
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 8.253

6.  Effect of surgeon-related factors on outcome of retinal detachment surgery: analyses of data in Japan-retinal detachment registry.

Authors:  Keita Yamakiri; Taiji Sakamoto; Chihaya Koriyama; Ryo Kawasaki; Takayuki Baba; Koichi Nishitsuka; Takashi Koto; Hiroto Terasaki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.