Literature DB >> 22321800

Regional practice patterns for retinal detachment repair in the United States.

John C Hwang1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if there are variations in regional practice patterns for retinal detachment repair in the United States.
DESIGN: Retrospective, noninterventional, cross-sectional study.
METHODS: Year 2009 Medicare fee-for-service claims for retinal detachment repair were aggregated in 4 geographic regions and evaluated. The relative preference for retinal detachment repair by pars plana vitrectomy, scleral buckling, and pneumatic retinopexy was analyzed.
RESULTS: The Midwest demonstrated a greater preference for scleral buckling compared to all other regions (P < .01) and lower preference for pars plana vitrectomy relative to the South and West (P ≤ .02). The Northeast demonstrated a greater preference for pneumatic retinopexy when compared to all other regions (P < .01). The Northeast also revealed a trend toward a lower preference for pars plana vitrectomy compared to the West and South (P ≤ .08).
CONCLUSION: There are statistically significant variations in regional practice patterns for retinal detachment repair. The West, despite its historical association with pneumatic retinopexy, did not demonstrate a greater preference for the surgical technique.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22321800     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.11.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  17 in total

1.  Pneumatic Retinopexy Experience and Outcomes of Vitreoretinal Fellows in the United States: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Parisa Emami-Naeini; Jordan Deaner; Ferhina Ali; Priyanka Gogte; Richard Kaplan; Kevin C Chen; Eric Nudleman; Dilraj S Grewal; Meenakashi Gupta; Jeremy D Wolfe; Michael Klufas; Glenn Yiu
Journal:  Ophthalmol Retina       Date:  2018-09-20

2.  Air tamponade in retinal detachment surgery followed by ultra-widefield fundus imaging system.

Authors:  Qian-Yin Chen; Yun-Xia Tang; Yan-Qiong He; Hui-Min Lin; Ru-Long Gao; Meng-Yuan Li; Jin-Tong Hou; Hong-Jie Ma; Jing-Lin Zhang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Cost-effectiveness of retinal detachment repair.

Authors:  Jonathan S Chang; William E Smiddy
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Determinants in Initial Treatment Choice for Diabetic Macular Edema.

Authors:  Brian L VanderBeek; Kurt Scavelli; Yinxi Yu
Journal:  Ophthalmol Retina       Date:  2019-05-25

Review 5.  Pneumatic retinopexy: an update.

Authors:  Chyong-Yng Huang; Mia Mikowski; Lihteh Wu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Surgical repair of primary non-complex rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in the modern era of small-gauge vitrectomy.

Authors:  Omar Moinuddin; Rebhi O Abuzaitoun; Min W Hwang; Sanjana K Sathrasala; Xing D Chen; Joshua D Stein; Mark W Johnson; David N Zacks; Thomas J Wubben; Cagri G Besirli
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-25

Review 7.  A Review of Innovations in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Surgical Techniques.

Authors:  Achia Nemet; Ala Moshiri; Glenn Yiu; Anat Loewenstein; Elad Moisseiev
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-07       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Reassessment of pneumatic retinopexy for primary treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Authors:  Eyal Cohen; Amir Zerach; Michael Mimouni; Adiel Barak
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-02

Review 9.  Tamponade in the surgical management of retinal detachment.

Authors:  Kamyar Vaziri; Stephen G Schwartz; Krishna S Kishor; Harry W Flynn
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-16

Review 10.  Pneumatic retinopexy: patient selection and specific factors.

Authors:  Stephen Stewart; Wing Chan
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.