Literature DB >> 28283281

Trends in Vitreoretinal Procedures for Medicare Beneficiaries, 2000 to 2014.

Michael D McLaughlin1, John C Hwang2.   

Abstract

TOPIC: The purpose of this study was to identify changes in use for vitreoretinal procedures by measuring the number of allowed services using data from the US Medicare Part B Fee-for-Service (FFS) beneficiaries and their providers. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To analyze vitreoretinal procedural trends, which may indicate standard of care and importance of developing methods of treatments.
METHODS: Medicare Part B National Summary Data Files for calendar years 2000 to 2014 were used to identify the number of allowed services for vitreoretinal procedures and commonly used pharmacologic agents. Linear regression analysis was performed to identify trends in use. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: To analyze vitreoretinal procedural trends, which may indicate standard of care and importance of developing methods of treatments.
RESULTS: Vitreoretinal procedures grew 6-fold from 2000 to 2014. Intravitreal injections were the primary driver of growth. A total of 2922 injections were performed in 2000, compared with 2 619 950 injections in 2014 (P < 0.01). Scleral buckling declined from 6502 procedures in 2000 to 1260 procedures in 2014 (P < 0.01), whereas vitrectomy use for retinal detachment increased from 13 814 surgeries in 2008 to 19 288 surgeries in 2014 (P < 0.01). Focal laser treatments declined from 188 351 procedures in 2002 to 83 379 procedures in 2014 (P < 0.01). Panretinal photocoagulation treatments declined from 109 840 procedures in 2004 to 81 005 procedures in 2014 (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Vitreoretinal practice patterns changed significantly from 2000 to 2014. Intravitreal injections increased by 89 563%. Intravitreal injections accounted for 0.55% of all vitreoretinal procedures in 2000 and increased to 87% in 2014. Scleral buckling sharply declined, and preference for retinal detachment repair shifted further toward vitrectomy with a distribution of 83% vitrectomy, 5% scleral buckling, and 12% pneumatic retinopexy in 2014. Use of laser photocoagulation significantly declined for treatment of macular edema and proliferative retinopathy. Cryotherapy procedures declined across all indications.
Copyright © 2017 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28283281     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  19 in total

1.  Pneumatic Retinopexy Experience and Outcomes of Vitreoretinal Fellows in the United States: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Parisa Emami-Naeini; Jordan Deaner; Ferhina Ali; Priyanka Gogte; Richard Kaplan; Kevin C Chen; Eric Nudleman; Dilraj S Grewal; Meenakashi Gupta; Jeremy D Wolfe; Michael Klufas; Glenn Yiu
Journal:  Ophthalmol Retina       Date:  2018-09-20

2.  Use of Bevacizumab and Ranibizumab for Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Influence of CATT Results and Introduction of Aflibercept.

Authors:  Suzann Pershing; Nidhi Talwar; Stephen T Armenti; Joseph Grubbs; Julie M Rosenthal; Vaidehi S Dedania; Joshua D Stein
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  [Trends in retinal detachment surgery : What has changed compared to 2001?]

Authors:  C V Fischer; M Kulanga; H Hoerauf
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 4.  Vitreous function and intervention of it with vitrectomy and other modalities.

Authors:  Yao Zong; Qian-Ying Gao; Yan-Nian Hui
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 5.  Pneumatic retinopexy: an update.

Authors:  Chyong-Yng Huang; Mia Mikowski; Lihteh Wu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Vitreous function and intervention of it with vitrectomy and other modalities.

Authors:  Yao Zong; Qian-Ying Gao; Yan-Nian Hui
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 1.645

7.  Outcomes of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair When Comparing Surgeon Continuity in a Team-Based Practice.

Authors:  Joseph J Raevis; Zackery Oakey; Michael Altaweel; T Michael Nork; Justin Gottlieb; Michael Ip; Elaine Downie; Michael Lasarev; Jonathan S Chang
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 1.296

8.  Culture-Proven Endophthalmitis After Intravitreal Injection: A 10-Year Analysis.

Authors:  Joseph M Simonett; Austin Igelman; Stanford C Taylor; J Peter Campbell; Thomas S Hwang; Phoebe Lin; Andreas K Lauer; Christina J Flaxel
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 1.300

9.  Surgical repair of primary non-complex rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in the modern era of small-gauge vitrectomy.

Authors:  Omar Moinuddin; Rebhi O Abuzaitoun; Min W Hwang; Sanjana K Sathrasala; Xing D Chen; Joshua D Stein; Mark W Johnson; David N Zacks; Thomas J Wubben; Cagri G Besirli
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-25

10.  Clinical Outcomes of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Treated With Pneumatic Retinopexy.

Authors:  Nicolas A Yannuzzi; Charles Li; Danielle Fujino; Scott P Kelly; Flora Lum; Harry W Flynn; D Wilkin Parke
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 8.253

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.