Literature DB >> 7876950

Evaluation of a simple office-based strategy for increasing influenza vaccine administration and the effect of differing reimbursement plans on the patient acceptance rate.

P A Merkel1, G C Caputo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study an office-based strategy for increasing influenza vaccine delivery to high-risk patients at a university hospital general medicine practice.
DESIGN: Historically controlled study of physician practices in an outpatient general medicine setting.
SETTING: A group practice with two separate offices: a fee-for-service (FFS) office, where the patients pay the cost of immunizations, and a health maintenance organization (HMO)-styled office, where the costs for immunizations are fully covered by the insurer. PATIENTS: All outpatients seen at each practice setting from October to December, 1991. INTERVENTION: For each patient visit, a simple reminder data sheet was completed by the clinician detailing the vaccination eligibility (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria) and status of the patient, the reasons for failure to vaccinate eligible patients, and 1990 vaccination information.
RESULTS: During the study period, 511 patients were seen by the practice (353 in the FFS office, 158 in the HMO office). 297 patients (58%) were eligible for vaccination; 219 in the FFS office, 78 in the HMO office (p < 0.01). At the end of the study period, 73% of all the eligible patients were vaccinated: 67% of the FFS patients vs 90% of the HMO patients (p < 0.01). 22% of the eligible patients refused vaccination: 27% in the FFS office vs 9% in the HMO office (p < 0.01). 11% of the eligible FFS patients vs 0% of the eligible HMO patients refused vaccination due to vaccine cost (p < 0.05). Of the eligible patients seen at the two offices in both 1990 and 1991. 50% were vaccinated in 1990 (preintervention) vs 66% in 1991 (postintervention) (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: As shown in this study, a simple, low-cost office-based reminder system can significantly increase the influenza vaccination rate for high-risk outpatients and can help meet national vaccination rate goals. Vaccine cost to patients may be a barrier to vaccine acceptance, in some cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7876950     DOI: 10.1007/bf02599008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  30 in total

1.  Computer-generated mailed reminders for influenza immunization: a clinical trial.

Authors:  W P Moran; K Nelson; J L Wofford; R Velez
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Long-term success with the national health objective for influenza vaccination: an institution-wide model.

Authors:  K L Nichol
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Increasing influenza vaccination adherence through voice mail.

Authors:  V O Leirer; D G Morrow; G Pariante; T Doksum
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  A nurse-initiated reminder system for the periodic health examination. Implementation and evaluation.

Authors:  R A Davidson; S W Fletcher; S Retchin; S Duh
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1984-11

5.  A target-based model for increasing influenza immunizations in private practice. Genesee Hospital Medical Staff.

Authors:  J Buffington; K M Bell; F M LaForce
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Achieving the national health objective for influenza immunization: success of an institution-wide vaccination program.

Authors:  K L Nichol; J E Korn; K L Margolis; G A Poland; R A Petzel; R P Lofgren
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Disparity between influenza vaccination rates and risks for influenza-associated hospital discharge and death in Manitoba in 1982-1983.

Authors:  D S Fedson; A Wajda; J P Nicol; L L Roos
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Patient acceptance of influenza vaccination.

Authors:  N H Fiebach; C M Viscoli
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Improving influenza vaccination rates for high-risk inpatients.

Authors:  K L Nichol
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Do postcard reminders improve influenza compliance? A prospective trial of different postcard "cues".

Authors:  E B Larson; J Bergman; F Heidrich; B L Alvin; R Schneeweiss
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to increase influenza vaccination rates of those 60 years and older in the community.

Authors:  Roger E Thomas; Diane L Lorenzetti
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-07-07

Review 2.  Interventions to increase influenza vaccination rates of those 60 years and older in the community.

Authors:  Roger E Thomas; Diane L Lorenzetti
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-30

3.  The intention of Dutch general practitioners to offer vaccination against pneumococcal disease, herpes zoster and pertussis to people aged 60 years and older.

Authors:  Birthe A Lehmann; Renske Eilers; Liesbeth Mollema; José Ferreira; Hester E de Melker
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.921

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.