Literature DB >> 30929136

Eye gaze of endoscopists during simulated colonoscopy.

Wenjing He1, Simon Bryns1, Karen Kroeker2, Anup Basu3, Daniel Birch4, Bin Zheng5.   

Abstract

Regaining orientation during an endoscopic procedure is critical. We investigated how endoscopists maintain orientation based on video and eye gaze analysis. Novices and experts performed a simulated colonoscopy procedure. Task performance was assessed by completion time, total distance traveled, maximum depth of insertion, percentage of mucosa viewed, and air insufflation volume. Procedure videos were analyzed by transfers among three viewing areas: center of bowel lumen, edge of bowel lumen, and other structure without bowel lumen in sight. Performers' gaze features were also examined over these viewing areas. Experts required less time to complete the procedure (P < 0.001). Novices' scope traveled a greater distance (P < 0.001) and more scope was inserted compared to an expert (P < 0.001). Novices also insufflated more air than experts (P < 0.001). Experts maintained the view of bowel lumen in the middle of the screen, while novices often left it on the edge (P = 0.032). When disorientation happened, novices brought the view to the edge more frequently than the center. However, experts were able to bring it back to the center directly. Eye tracking showed that the rate of saccades in experts increased when the bowel lumen moved away from the central view, such a behavior was not observed in novices. Maintaining a centered view of the bowel lumen is a strategy used by expert endoscopists. Video and eye tracking analysis revealed a key difference in eye gaze behavior when regaining orientation between novice and experienced endoscopists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Competence; Endoscopy; Eye Movements; Orientation; Training

Year:  2019        PMID: 30929136     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-019-00950-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  17 in total

1.  "Eye-tracking" for assessment of image perception in gastrointestinal endoscopy with narrow-band imaging compared with white-light endoscopy.

Authors:  A Meining; S Atasoy; A Chung; N Navab; G Z Yang
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Virtual reality colonoscopy simulation: a compulsory practice for the future colonoscopist?

Authors:  G Ahlberg; R Hultcrantz; E Jaramillo; A Lindblom; D Arvidsson
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Construct validity of the LapSim: can the LapSim virtual reality simulator distinguish between novices and experts?

Authors:  K W van Dongen; E Tournoij; D C van der Zee; M P Schijven; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Training and competence assessment in GI endoscopy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vivian E Ekkelenkamp; Arjun D Koch; Robert A de Man; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Measuring gaze patterns during colonoscopy: a useful tool to evaluate colon inspection?

Authors:  Vincent K Dik; Ignace T C Hooge; Martijn G H van Oijen; Peter D Siersema
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.566

6.  Adaptation of the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery box for endoscopic simulation: performance evaluation of the first 100 participants.

Authors:  Ilay Habaz; Silvana Perretta; Allan Okrainec; Oscar M Crespin; Andrea V Kwong; Ethan Weiss; Else van der Velden; Ludovica Guerriero; Fabio Longo; Pietro Mascagni; Louis W C Liu; Timothy D Jackson; Lee L Swanstrom; Eran Shlomovitz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Limitations of teaching endoscopy.

Authors:  Amnon Sonnenberg
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.566

8.  A new endoscopic simulator.

Authors:  S Bar-Meir
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  Bleeding and perforation after outpatient colonoscopy and their risk factors in usual clinical practice.

Authors:  Linda Rabeneck; Lawrence F Paszat; Robert J Hilsden; Refik Saskin; Des Leddin; Eva Grunfeld; Elaine Wai; Meredith Goldwasser; Rinku Sutradhar; Therese A Stukel
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Effective teaching of endoscopy: a qualitative study of the perceptions of gastroenterology fellows and attending gastroenterologists.

Authors:  Daniel J Zanchetti; Samuel A Schueler; Brian C Jacobson; Robert C Lowe
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2016-03-22
View more
  2 in total

1.  Identification of gaze pattern and blind spots by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy using an eye-tracking technique.

Authors:  Ayoung Lee; Hyunsoo Chung; Yejin Cho; Jue Lie Kim; Jinju Choi; Eunwoo Lee; Bokyung Kim; Soo-Jeong Cho; Sang Gyun Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Detecting Task Difficulty of Learners in Colonoscopy: Evidence from Eye-Tracking.

Authors:  Liu Xin; Zheng Bin; Duan Xiaoqin; He Wenjing; Li Yuandong; Zhao Jinyu; Zhao Chen; Wang Lin
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 0.957

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.