Patrick Vinck1, Phuong N Pham2, Kenedy K Bindu3, Juliet Bedford4, Eric J Nilles2. 1. Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. Electronic address: pvinck@hsph.harvard.edu. 2. Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. 3. Center for Research on Democracy and Development in Arica, Free University of the Great Lakes Countries in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Goma, DR Congo. 4. Anthrologica, Oxford, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The current outbreak of Ebola in eastern DR Congo, beginning in 2018, emerged in a complex and violent political and security environment. Community-level prevention and outbreak control measures appear to be dependent on public trust in relevant authorities and information, but little scholarship has explored these issues. We aimed to investigate the role of trust and misinformation on individual preventive behaviours during an outbreak of Ebola virus disease (EVD). METHODS: We surveyed 961 adults between Sept 1 and Sept 16, 2018. We used a multistage sampling design in Beni and Butembo in North Kivu, DR Congo. Of 412 avenues and cells (the lowest administrative structures; 99 in Beni and 313 in Butembo), we randomly selected 30 in each city. In each avenue or cell, 16 households were selected using the WHO Expanded Programme on Immunization's random walk approach. In each household, one adult (aged ≥18 years) was randomly selected for interview. Standardised questionnaires were administered by experienced interviewers. We used multivariate models to examine the intermediate variables of interest, including institutional trust and belief in selected misinformation, with outcomes of interest related to EVD prevention behaviours. FINDINGS: Among 961 respondents, 349 (31·9%, 95% CI 27·4-36·9) trusted that local authorities represent their interest. Belief in misinformation was widespread, with 230 (25·5%, 21·7-29·6) respondents believing that the Ebola outbreak was not real. Low institutional trust and belief in misinformation were associated with a decreased likelihood of adopting preventive behaviours, including acceptance of Ebola vaccines (odds ratio 0·22, 95% CI 0·21-0·22, and 1·40, 1·39-1·42) and seeking formal health care (0·06, 0·05-0·06, and 1·16, 1·15-1·17). INTERPRETATION: The findings underscore the practical implications of mistrust and misinformation for outbreak control. These factors are associated with low compliance with messages of social and behavioural change and refusal to seek formal medical care or accept vaccines, which in turn increases the risk of spread of EVD. FUNDING: The Harvard Humanitarian Initiative Innovation Fund.
BACKGROUND: The current outbreak of Ebola in eastern DR Congo, beginning in 2018, emerged in a complex and violent political and security environment. Community-level prevention and outbreak control measures appear to be dependent on public trust in relevant authorities and information, but little scholarship has explored these issues. We aimed to investigate the role of trust and misinformation on individual preventive behaviours during an outbreak of Ebola virus disease (EVD). METHODS: We surveyed 961 adults between Sept 1 and Sept 16, 2018. We used a multistage sampling design in Beni and Butembo in North Kivu, DR Congo. Of 412 avenues and cells (the lowest administrative structures; 99 in Beni and 313 in Butembo), we randomly selected 30 in each city. In each avenue or cell, 16 households were selected using the WHO Expanded Programme on Immunization's random walk approach. In each household, one adult (aged ≥18 years) was randomly selected for interview. Standardised questionnaires were administered by experienced interviewers. We used multivariate models to examine the intermediate variables of interest, including institutional trust and belief in selected misinformation, with outcomes of interest related to EVD prevention behaviours. FINDINGS: Among 961 respondents, 349 (31·9%, 95% CI 27·4-36·9) trusted that local authorities represent their interest. Belief in misinformation was widespread, with 230 (25·5%, 21·7-29·6) respondents believing that the Ebola outbreak was not real. Low institutional trust and belief in misinformation were associated with a decreased likelihood of adopting preventive behaviours, including acceptance of Ebola vaccines (odds ratio 0·22, 95% CI 0·21-0·22, and 1·40, 1·39-1·42) and seeking formal health care (0·06, 0·05-0·06, and 1·16, 1·15-1·17). INTERPRETATION: The findings underscore the practical implications of mistrust and misinformation for outbreak control. These factors are associated with low compliance with messages of social and behavioural change and refusal to seek formal medical care or accept vaccines, which in turn increases the risk of spread of EVD. FUNDING: The Harvard Humanitarian Initiative Innovation Fund.
Authors: Chad R Wells; Abhishek Pandey; Martial L Ndeffo Mbah; Bernard-A Gaüzère; Denis Malvy; Burton H Singer; Alison P Galvani Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-10-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jay J Van Bavel; Katherine Baicker; Paulo S Boggio; Valerio Capraro; Aleksandra Cichocka; Mina Cikara; Molly J Crockett; Alia J Crum; Karen M Douglas; James N Druckman; John Drury; Oeindrila Dube; Naomi Ellemers; Eli J Finkel; James H Fowler; Michele Gelfand; Shihui Han; S Alexander Haslam; Jolanda Jetten; Shinobu Kitayama; Dean Mobbs; Lucy E Napper; Dominic J Packer; Gordon Pennycook; Ellen Peters; Richard E Petty; David G Rand; Stephen D Reicher; Simone Schnall; Azim Shariff; Linda J Skitka; Sandra Susan Smith; Cass R Sunstein; Nassim Tabri; Joshua A Tucker; Sander van der Linden; Paul van Lange; Kim A Weeden; Michael J A Wohl; Jamil Zaki; Sean R Zion; Robb Willer Journal: Nat Hum Behav Date: 2020-04-30
Authors: Jamie Bedson; Laura A Skrip; Danielle Pedi; Sharon Abramowitz; Simone Carter; Mohamed F Jalloh; Sebastian Funk; Nina Gobat; Tamara Giles-Vernick; Gerardo Chowell; João Rangel de Almeida; Rania Elessawi; Samuel V Scarpino; Ross A Hammond; Sylvie Briand; Joshua M Epstein; Laurent Hébert-Dufresne; Benjamin M Althouse Journal: Nat Hum Behav Date: 2021-06-28
Authors: Claudia F Nisa; Jocelyn J Bélanger; Daiane G Faller; Nicholas R Buttrick; Jochen O Mierau; Maura M K Austin; Birga M Schumpe; Edyta M Sasin; Maximilian Agostini; Ben Gützkow; Jannis Kreienkamp; Georgios Abakoumkin; Jamilah Hanum Abdul Khaiyom; Vjollca Ahmedi; Handan Akkas; Carlos A Almenara; Mohsin Atta; Sabahat Cigdem Bagci; Sima Basel; Edona Berisha Kida; Allan B I Bernardo; Phatthanakit Chobthamkit; Hoon-Seok Choi; Mioara Cristea; Sára Csaba; Kaja Damnjanović; Ivan Danyliuk; Arobindu Dash; Daniela Di Santo; Karen M Douglas; Violeta Enea; Gavan Fitzsimons; Alexandra Gheorghiu; Ángel Gómez; Joanna Grzymala-Moszczynska; Ali Hamaidia; Qing Han; Mai Helmy; Joevarian Hudiyana; Bertus F Jeronimus; Ding-Yu Jiang; Veljko Jovanović; Željka Kamenov; Anna Kende; Shian-Ling Keng; Tra Thi Thanh Kieu; Yasin Koc; Kamila Kovyazina; Inna Kozytska; Joshua Krause; Arie W Kruglanski; Anton Kurapov; Maja Kutlaca; Nóra Anna Lantos; Edward P Lemay; Cokorda Bagus Jaya Lesmana; Winnifred R Louis; Adrian Lueders; Najma Iqbal Malik; Anton Martinez; Kira O McCabe; Jasmina Mehulić; Mirra Noor Milla; Idris Mohammed; Erica Molinario; Manuel Moyano; Hayat Muhammad; Silvana Mula; Hamdi Muluk; Solomiia Myroniuk; Reza Najafi; Boglárka Nyúl; Paul A O'Keefe; Jose Javier Olivas Osuna; Evgeny N Osin; Joonha Park; Gennaro Pica; Antonio Pierro; Jonas Rees; Anne Margit Reitsema; Elena Resta; Marika Rullo; Michelle K Ryan; Adil Samekin; Pekka Santtila; Heyla A Selim; Michael Vicente Stanton; Samiah Sultana; Robbie M Sutton; Eleftheria Tseliou; Akira Utsugi; Jolien Anne van Breen; Caspar J Van Lissa; Kees Van Veen; Michelle R vanDellen; Alexandra Vázquez; Robin Wollast; Victoria Wai-Lan Yeung; Somayeh Zand; Iris Lav Žeželj; Bang Zheng; Andreas Zick; Claudia Zúñiga; N Pontus Leander Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-05-06 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Yann Algan; Daniel Cohen; Eva Davoine; Martial Foucault; Stefanie Stantcheva Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2021-10-05 Impact factor: 11.205