Anton Pak1, Emma McBryde1, Oyelola A Adegboye1,2. 1. Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia. 2. Public Health & Tropical Medicine, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine how public trust mediates the people's adherence to levels of stringent government health policies and to establish if these effects vary across the political regimes. METHODS: This study utilizes data from two large-scale surveys: the global behaviors and perceptions at the onset of COVID-19 pandemic and the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT). Linear regression models were used to estimate the effects of public trust and strictness of restriction measures on people's compliance level. The model accounted for individual and daily variations in country-level stringency of preventative measures. Differences in the dynamics between public trust, the stringent level of government health guidelines and policy compliance were also examined among countries based on political regimes. RESULTS: We find strong evidence of the increase in compliance due to the imposition of stricter government restrictions. The examination of heterogeneous effects suggests that high public trust in government and the perception of its truthfulness double the impact of policy restrictions on public compliance. Among political regimes, higher levels of public trust significantly increase the predicted compliance as stringency level rises in authoritarian and democratic countries. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the importance of public trust in government and its institutions during public health emergencies such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Our results are relevant and help understand why governments need to address the risks of non-compliance among low trusting individuals to achieve the success of the containment policies.
PURPOSE: To examine how public trust mediates the people's adherence to levels of stringent government health policies and to establish if these effects vary across the political regimes. METHODS: This study utilizes data from two large-scale surveys: the global behaviors and perceptions at the onset of COVID-19 pandemic and the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT). Linear regression models were used to estimate the effects of public trust and strictness of restriction measures on people's compliance level. The model accounted for individual and daily variations in country-level stringency of preventative measures. Differences in the dynamics between public trust, the stringent level of government health guidelines and policy compliance were also examined among countries based on political regimes. RESULTS: We find strong evidence of the increase in compliance due to the imposition of stricter government restrictions. The examination of heterogeneous effects suggests that high public trust in government and the perception of its truthfulness double the impact of policy restrictions on public compliance. Among political regimes, higher levels of public trust significantly increase the predicted compliance as stringency level rises in authoritarian and democratic countries. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the importance of public trust in government and its institutions during public health emergencies such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Our results are relevant and help understand why governments need to address the risks of non-compliance among low trusting individuals to achieve the success of the containment policies.
Authors: Giovanni Bonaccorsi; Francesco Pierri; Matteo Cinelli; Andrea Flori; Alessandro Galeazzi; Francesco Porcelli; Ana Lucia Schmidt; Carlo Michele Valensise; Antonio Scala; Walter Quattrociocchi; Fabio Pammolli Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-06-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Anton Pak; Oyelola A Adegboye; Adeshina I Adekunle; Kazi M Rahman; Emma S McBryde; Damon P Eisen Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2020-05-29
Authors: Tamsyn E Van Rheenen; Denny Meyer; Erica Neill; Andrea Phillipou; Eric J Tan; Wei Lin Toh; Susan L Rossell Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2020-07-02 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Ryan P Badman; Ace X Wang; Martin Skrodzki; Heng-Chin Cho; David Aguilar-Lleyda; Naoko Shiono; Seng Bum Michael Yoo; Yen-Sheng Chiang; Rei Akaishi Journal: Behav Sci (Basel) Date: 2022-05-30
Authors: Andrew D Oxman; Atle Fretheim; Simon Lewin; Signe Flottorp; Claire Glenton; Arnfinn Helleve; Didrik Frimann Vestrheim; Bjørn Gunnar Iversen; Sarah E Rosenbaum Journal: Health Res Policy Syst Date: 2022-03-05
Authors: Emil Nafis Iftekhar; Viola Priesemann; Rudi Balling; Simon Bauer; Philippe Beutels; André Calero Valdez; Sarah Cuschieri; Thomas Czypionka; Uga Dumpis; Enrico Glaab; Eva Grill; Claudia Hanson; Pirta Hotulainen; Peter Klimek; Mirjam Kretzschmar; Tyll Krüger; Jenny Krutzinna; Nicola Low; Helena Machado; Carlos Martins; Martin McKee; Sebastian Bernd Mohr; Armin Nassehi; Matjaž Perc; Elena Petelos; Martyn Pickersgill; Barbara Prainsack; Joacim Rocklöv; Eva Schernhammer; Anthony Staines; Ewa Szczurek; Sotirios Tsiodras; Steven Van Gucht; Peter Willeit Journal: Lancet Reg Health Eur Date: 2021-07-30
Authors: Mark A Bellis; Karen Hughes; Kat Ford; Hannah C E Madden; Freya Glendinning; Sara Wood Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 3.006