Literature DB >> 30923885

Practical considerations when implementing peer learning conferences.

Anh-Vu Ngo1, A Luana Stanescu2, David W Swenson3, Michael M Moore4, Raymond W Sze5, Ramesh S Iyer2.   

Abstract

Peer learning represents a shift away from traditional peer review. Peer learning focuses on improvement of diagnostic performance rather than on suboptimal performance. The shift in focus away from random selection and toward identification of cases with valuable teaching points can encourage more active radiologist engagement in the learning process. An effective peer learning program relies on a trusting environment that lessens the fear of embarrassment or punitive action. Here we describe the shortcomings of traditional peer review, and the benefits of peer learning. We also provide tips for a successful peer learning program and examples of implementation.

Keywords:  Children; Peer learning; Peer review; Quality assurance; Quality improvement; RADPEER

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30923885     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-018-4305-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  14 in total

1.  RADPEER quality assurance program: a multifacility study of interpretive disagreement rates.

Authors:  James P Borgstede; Rebecca S Lewis; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Jonathan H Sunshine
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 2.  Radiology peer review as an opportunity to reduce errors and improve patient care.

Authors:  Mark J Halsted
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 3.  RADPEER scoring white paper.

Authors:  Valerie P Jackson; Trudie Cushing; Hani H Abujudeh; James P Borgstede; Kenneth W Chin; Charles K Grimes; David B Larson; Paul A Larson; Robert S Pyatt; William T Thorwarth
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Survey of faculty perceptions regarding a peer review system.

Authors:  Ronald L Eisenberg; Meredith L Cunningham; Bettina Siewert; Jonathan B Kruskal
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Consensus-oriented group peer review: a new process to review radiologist work output.

Authors:  Tarik K Alkasab; H Benjamin Harvey; Vrushab Gowda; James H Thrall; Daniel I Rosenthal; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Rethinking peer review: what aviation can teach radiology about performance improvement.

Authors:  David B Larson; John J Nance
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  ACR RADPEER Committee White Paper with 2016 Updates: Revised Scoring System, New Classifications, Self-Review, and Subspecialized Reports.

Authors:  Shlomit Goldberg-Stein; L Alexandre Frigini; Scott Long; Zeyad Metwalli; Xuan V Nguyen; Mark Parker; Hani Abujudeh
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  RADPEER peer review: relevance, use, concerns, challenges, and direction forward.

Authors:  Hani Abujudeh; Robert S Pyatt; Michael A Bruno; Alison L Chetlen; David Buck; Susan K Hobbs; Christopher Roth; Charles Truwit; Rajan Agarwal; Scott T O Kennedy; Lucille Glenn
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 5.532

9.  Peer Feedback, Learning, and Improvement: Answering the Call of the Institute of Medicine Report on Diagnostic Error.

Authors:  David B Larson; Lane F Donnelly; Daniel J Podberesky; Arnold C Merrow; Richard E Sharpe; Jonathan B Kruskal
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Practical Suggestions on How to Move From Peer Review to Peer Learning.

Authors:  Lane F Donnelly; David B Larson; Richard E Heller; Jonathan B Kruskal
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Optimizing Professional Practice Evaluation to Enable a Nonpunitive Learning Health System Approach to Peer Review.

Authors:  Christy I Sandborg; Gary E Hartman; Felice Su; Glyn Williams; Beate Teufe; Nina Wixson; David B Larson; Lane F Donnelly
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2020-12-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.