Literature DB >> 17411742

Radiology peer review as an opportunity to reduce errors and improve patient care.

Mark J Halsted1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 17411742     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Errors in neuroradiology.

Authors:  Ferdinando Caranci; Enrico Tedeschi; Giuseppe Leone; Alfonso Reginelli; Gianluca Gatta; Antonio Pinto; Ettore Squillaci; Francesco Briganti; Luca Brunese
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  Practical considerations when implementing peer learning conferences.

Authors:  Anh-Vu Ngo; A Luana Stanescu; David W Swenson; Michael M Moore; Raymond W Sze; Ramesh S Iyer
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-03-29

3.  Quality metrics currently used in academic radiology departments: results of the QUALMET survey.

Authors:  Eric A Walker; Jonelle M Petscavage-Thomas; Joseph S Fotos; Michael A Bruno
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  A workstation-integrated peer review quality assurance program: pilot study.

Authors:  Margaret M O'Keeffe; Todd M Davis; Kerry Siminoski
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 5.  Added value of double reading in diagnostic radiology,a systematic review.

Authors:  Håkan Geijer; Mats Geijer
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2018-03-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.