Literature DB >> 28551339

ACR RADPEER Committee White Paper with 2016 Updates: Revised Scoring System, New Classifications, Self-Review, and Subspecialized Reports.

Shlomit Goldberg-Stein1, L Alexandre Frigini2, Scott Long3, Zeyad Metwalli4, Xuan V Nguyen5, Mark Parker6, Hani Abujudeh7.   

Abstract

The ACR's RADPEER program is currently the leading method for peer review in the United States. To date, more than 18,000 radiologists and more than 1,100 groups participate in the program. The ABR accepted RADPEER as a practice quality improvement in 2009, which can be applied toward maintenance of certification; there are currently over 2,200 practice quality improvement participants. There have been ongoing deliberations regarding the utility of RADPEER, its goals, and its scoring system since the preceding 2009 white paper. This white paper reviews the history and evolution of RADPEER and eRADPEER, the 2016 ACR Peer Review Committee's discussions, the updated recommended scoring system and lexicon for RADPEER, and updates to eRADPEER including the study type, age, and discrepancy classifications. The central goal of RADPEER to aid in nonpunitive peer learning is discussed.
Copyright © 2017 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RADPEER; RADPEER learning; nonpunitive; peer learning; peer review

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28551339     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.03.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  7 in total

1.  Survey of peer review programs among pediatric radiologists: report from the SPR Quality and Safety Committee.

Authors:  Ramesh S Iyer; David W Swenson; Neil Anand; Einat Blumfield; Tushar Chandra; Govind B Chavhan; Thomas R Goodman; Naeem Khan; Michael M Moore; Thang D Ngo; Christina L Sammet; Raymond W Sze; Chido D Vera; A Luana Stanescu
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-03-29

Review 2.  Practical considerations when implementing peer learning conferences.

Authors:  Anh-Vu Ngo; A Luana Stanescu; David W Swenson; Michael M Moore; Raymond W Sze; Ramesh S Iyer
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-03-29

3.  Diagnostic Errors in Cerebrovascular Pathology: Retrospective Analysis of a Neuroradiology Database at a Large Tertiary Academic Medical Center.

Authors:  G Biddle; R Assadsangabi; K Broadhead; L Hacein-Bey; V Ivanovic
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 4.966

4.  Reporting of CT cervical spine after office hours by radiology trainees-analysis of discrepancy rates and RADPEER scores.

Authors:  Yet Yen Yan; Jenn Nee Khoo; Tien Jin Tan; Joe Francis; Le Roy Chong; Elizabeth Hui-Ying Chan
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2018-03-14

5.  Identification of quality improvement areas in pediatric MRI from analysis of patient safety reports.

Authors:  Camilo Jaimes; Diana J Murcia; Karen Miguel; Cathryn DeFuria; Pallavi Sagar; Michael S Gee
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-10-19

6.  [Peer Review of Teleradiology at a Teleradiology Clinic: Comparison of Unacceptable Diagnosis and Clinically Significant Discrepancy between Radiology Sections and Imaging Modalities].

Authors:  Hyung Suk Seo; Jai Soung Park; Yu-Whan Oh; Dongwook Sung; A Leum Lee
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2021-08-27

7.  Validation of an informatics tool to assess resident's progress in developing reporting skills.

Authors:  Facundo N Diaz; Marina Ulla
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2019-09-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.