PURPOSE: To be eligible for the Medicare Hospice Benefit, cancer patients with a life expectancy of 6 months or less must give up curative treatment. Our goal was to determine whether willingness to make this choice identifies patients with greater need for hospice services. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred patients with cancer and 171 family members were recruited from six oncology practices. Respondents completed conjoint interviews in which their perceived need for five hospice services was calculated from the choices they made among combinations of services. Patients' preferences for treatment were measured, and patients were followed for 6 months or until death. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (13%) said they would not want cancer treatment even if it offered an almost 100% chance of 6-month survival. These patients, who would have been eligible for hospice, did not have greater perceived need for hospice services compared with other patients (n = 262; mean, 1.75 v 1.98; Wilcoxon rank sum test, P = .46), nor did their family members (mean, 1.95 v 2.04; Wilcoxon rank sum test, P = .80). Instead, independent predictors of patients' perceived need for hospice services included African American ethnicity, less social support, worse functional status, and a greater burden of psychological symptoms. For families, predictors included caregiver burden, worse self-reported health, working outside the home, and caring for a patient with worse functional status. CONCLUSION: The requirement that patients forgo life-sustaining treatment does not identify patients with greater perceived need for hospice services. Other characteristics offer a better way to identify the patients who are most likely to benefit from hospice.
PURPOSE: To be eligible for the Medicare Hospice Benefit, cancerpatients with a life expectancy of 6 months or less must give up curative treatment. Our goal was to determine whether willingness to make this choice identifies patients with greater need for hospice services. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred patients with cancer and 171 family members were recruited from six oncology practices. Respondents completed conjoint interviews in which their perceived need for five hospice services was calculated from the choices they made among combinations of services. Patients' preferences for treatment were measured, and patients were followed for 6 months or until death. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (13%) said they would not want cancer treatment even if it offered an almost 100% chance of 6-month survival. These patients, who would have been eligible for hospice, did not have greater perceived need for hospice services compared with other patients (n = 262; mean, 1.75 v 1.98; Wilcoxon rank sum test, P = .46), nor did their family members (mean, 1.95 v 2.04; Wilcoxon rank sum test, P = .80). Instead, independent predictors of patients' perceived need for hospice services included African American ethnicity, less social support, worse functional status, and a greater burden of psychological symptoms. For families, predictors included caregiver burden, worse self-reported health, working outside the home, and caring for a patient with worse functional status. CONCLUSION: The requirement that patients forgo life-sustaining treatment does not identify patients with greater perceived need for hospice services. Other characteristics offer a better way to identify the patients who are most likely to benefit from hospice.
Authors: J A Shea; D A Asch; R F Johnson; R N Staroscik; P F Malet; B J Pollack; J R Clarke; P E Green; J S Schwartz; S V Williams Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 1997-07 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: J Cornoni-Huntley; A M Ostfeld; J O Taylor; R B Wallace; D Blazer; L F Berkman; D A Evans; F J Kohout; J H Lemke; P A Scherr Journal: Aging (Milano) Date: 1993-02
Authors: D F Cella; D S Tulsky; G Gray; B Sarafian; E Linn; A Bonomi; M Silberman; S B Yellen; P Winicour; J Brannon Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1993-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: R K Portenoy; H T Thaler; A B Kornblith; J M Lepore; H Friedlander-Klar; E Kiyasu; K Sobel; N Coyle; N Kemeny; L Norton Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 1994 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Susan Miesfeldt; Kimberly Murray; Lee Lucas; Chiang-Hua Chang; David Goodman; Nancy E Morden Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2012-04-02 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Camilla Zimmermann; Debika Burman; Shazeen Bandukwala; Dori Seccareccia; Ebru Kaya; John Bryson; Gary Rodin; Christopher Lo Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2009-07-23 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Yu-Ning Wong; Brian L Egleston; Kush Sachdeva; Naa Eghan; Melanie Pirollo; Tammy K Stump; John Robert Beck; Katrina Armstrong; Jerome Sanford Schwartz; Neal J Meropol Journal: Med Care Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Ann M O'Hare; Catherine R Butler; Janelle S Taylor; Susan P Y Wong; Elizabeth K Vig; Ryan S Laundry; Melissa W Wachterman; Paul L Hebert; Chuan-Fen Liu; Nilka Rios-Burrows; Claire A Richards Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 10.121