Literature DB >> 30919242

Ultrasound liver map technique for laparoscopic liver resections: perioperative outcomes are not impaired by technical complexity.

Alessandro Ferrero1, Nadia Russolillo2, Serena Langella2, Fabio Forchino2, Matteo Stasi2, Federico Fazio2, Roberto Lo Tesoriere2.   

Abstract

Intraoperative liver ultrasound has a crucial role to guide open liver surgery. A 4-step ultrasound liver map technique for laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been standardized in our center. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of our technique according to the hepatectomy technical complexity. A difficulty scale (DS) ranging from 1 to 10 was applied to each LLR. A cumulative sum control-chart analysis identified 3 periods of gradually increasing DS. Perioperative outcomes of the 3 periods were compared. 300 LLRs performed between 2006 and 2018 were analyzed. Median DS was 3 for first 100 cases (P1), 5 for cases 101-200 (P2) and 6 for cases 201-300 (P3). A significantly greater percentage of postero-superior segments resections (P1 11%, P2 36%, P3 46%, p < 0.001) were performed in P3. P3 LLRs had a significantly longer transection time (p < 0.001) and wider cut surface area (p < 0.001), but median blood losses were similar among the 3 periods (P1 100 cc, P2 100 cc, P3 140 cc). There were no differences among periods in overall morbidity (P1 12%, P2 17%, P3 17%), major morbidity (P1 1%, P2 2%, P3 3%) and length of hospital stay (5 days in all the three groups). Despite the increasing surgical complexity of LLR, ultrasound liver map technique allows good perioperative outcomes.

Keywords:  Intraoperative liver ultrasound; Laparoscopic liver resection; Technical difficulty

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30919242     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-019-00646-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  28 in total

1.  Laparoscopic ultrasound: a survey of its current and future use, requirements, and integration with navigation technology.

Authors:  Cecilie Våpenstad; Anna Rethy; Thomas Langø; Tormod Selbekk; Brynjulf Ystgaard; Toril A Nagelhus Hernes; Ronald Mårvik
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Comparative benefits of laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  Kevin Tri Nguyen; J Wallis Marsh; Allan Tsung; J Jennifer L Steel; T Clark Gamblin; David A Geller
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2010-11-15

3.  Critical appraisal of predictive tools to assess the difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review.

Authors:  Julie Hallet; Patrick Pessaux; Kaitlyn A Beyfuss; Shiva Jayaraman; Pablo E Serrano; Guillaume Martel; Natalie G Coburn; Tullio Piardi; Alyson L Mahar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  The learning curve in laparoscopic major liver resection.

Authors:  Michael D Kluger; Luca Vigano; Ryan Barroso; Daniel Cherqui
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.027

5.  Hepatectomy as treatment of choice for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly cirrhotic patients.

Authors:  Alessandro Ferrero; Luca Viganò; Roberto Polastri; Dario Ribero; Roberto Lo Tesoriere; Andrea Muratore; Lorenzo Capussotti
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Approach to hepatocaval confluence during laparoscopic right hepatectomy: three variations on a theme.

Authors:  Francesca Ratti; Federica Cipriani; Marco Catena; Michele Paganelli; Luca Aldrighetti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic liver resection.

Authors:  E Vibert; T Perniceni; H Levard; C Denet; N K Shahri; B Gayet
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Diffusion, outcomes and implementation of minimally invasive liver surgery: a snapshot from the I Go MILS (Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery) Registry.

Authors:  Luca Aldrighetti; Francesca Ratti; Umberto Cillo; Alessandro Ferrero; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre; Alfredo Guglielmi; Felice Giuliante; Fulvio Calise
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-08-31

9.  Preliminary evaluation of sonolaparoscopy in the diagnosis of liver diseases.

Authors:  M Fukuda; K Hirata; S Mima
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  Oncological safety of ultrasound-guided laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal metastases: a case-control study.

Authors:  Serena Langella; Nadia Russolillo; Marco D'Eletto; Fabio Forchino; Roberto Lo Tesoriere; Alessandro Ferrero
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-07-29
View more
  3 in total

1.  Correlation between anthropometric data and preparatory maneuvers difficulties during laparoscopic right liver resections: a single center prospective study.

Authors:  Nadia Russolillo; Michele Casella; Serena Langella; Roberto Lo Tesoriere; Paolo Ossola; Alessandro Ferrero
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.453

2.  Impact of anthropometric data on technical difficulty of laparoscopic liver of resections of segments 7 and 8: the CHALLENGE index.

Authors:  Nadia Russolillo; Cecilia Maina; Serena Langella; Roberto Lo Tesoriere; Michele Casella; Alessandro Ferrero
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Augmented Reality and Image-Guided Robotic Liver Surgery.

Authors:  Fabio Giannone; Emanuele Felli; Zineb Cherkaoui; Pietro Mascagni; Patrick Pessaux
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 6.639

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.