Literature DB >> 35211801

Correlation between anthropometric data and preparatory maneuvers difficulties during laparoscopic right liver resections: a single center prospective study.

Nadia Russolillo1,2, Michele Casella3, Serena Langella3, Roberto Lo Tesoriere3, Paolo Ossola3, Alessandro Ferrero3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The difficulty of laparoscopic right liver resections (LRLR) is mainly associated with their poor accessibility. Anthropometric data rather than BMI was reported to predict transection time and blood loss. Aim of the study was to evaluate the correlation between anthropometric data and preparatory manoeuvres difficulties during LRLR.
METHODS: All patients who underwent LRLR requiring full right liver mobilization from November 2019 to March 2021 were prospectively included in the study. Data on surgeons' difficulty perceptions on liver mobilization (LM), isolation of right hepatic vein (RHVI), liver manageability and visibility were rated with a 5-point scale. Data on cranio-caudal liver diameters (CCliv), CHALLENGE Index (CCliv/latero-lateral abdomen diameter), times needed to LM and RHVI were collected.
RESULTS: Sixty-five patients (29 wedge and 36 anatomical resections) with a median BMI of 25.5 were analysed. One patient required open conversion due to oncological reason. No correlations between BMI and CCliv or CHALLENGE Index were found. Larger CCliv diameter correlated with longer time for both RHVI (r = 0.589, p = 0.002) and LM (r = 0.222, p = 0.049). Higher CHALLENGE index correlated with longer time for RHVI (r = 0.589, p = 0.002). The CHALLENGE index showed a linear correlation with difficulty to the isolation of RHV (r = 0.327, p = 0.045), whilst the liver manipulation difficulty increased with latero-lateral liver diameter (r = 0.244, p = 0.033). BMI had no correlation with the duration of preparatory maneuvers neither with surgeons' difficulties.
CONCLUSIONS: Anthropometric data can help to anticipate the difficulty of preparatory maneuvers during laparoscopic right liver resections.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anthropometric data; Laparoscopic liver resection; Liver measurement; Right liver mobilization; Right liver resection

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35211801     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09130-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   3.453


  10 in total

1.  Ultrasound liver map technique for laparoscopic liver resections: perioperative outcomes are not impaired by technical complexity.

Authors:  Alessandro Ferrero; Nadia Russolillo; Serena Langella; Fabio Forchino; Matteo Stasi; Federico Fazio; Roberto Lo Tesoriere
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2019-03-27

2.  Difficulty of Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Proposal for a New Classification.

Authors:  Yoshikuni Kawaguchi; David Fuks; Norihiro Kokudo; Brice Gayet
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Liver resection without pedicle clamping: feasibility and need for "salvage clamping". Looking for the right clamping policy. Analysis of 512 consecutive resections.

Authors:  Luca Viganò; Syed A A Jaffary; Alessandro Ferrero; Nadia Russolillo; Serena Langella; Lorenzo Capussotti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Ultrasound-guided laparoscopic liver resections.

Authors:  Alessandro Ferrero; Roberto Lo Tesoriere; Nadia Russolillo; Luca Viganò; Fabio Forchino; Lorenzo Capussotti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  The Southampton Consensus Guidelines for Laparoscopic Liver Surgery: From Indication to Implementation.

Authors:  Mohammad Abu Hilal; Luca Aldrighetti; Ibrahim Dagher; Bjorn Edwin; Roberto Ivan Troisi; Ruslan Alikhanov; Somaiah Aroori; Giulio Belli; Marc Besselink; Javier Briceno; Brice Gayet; Mathieu D'Hondt; Mickael Lesurtel; Krishna Menon; Peter Lodge; Fernando Rotellar; Julio Santoyo; Olivier Scatton; Olivier Soubrane; Robert Sutcliffe; Ronald Van Dam; Steve White; Mark Christopher Halls; Federica Cipriani; Marcel Van der Poel; Ruben Ciria; Leonid Barkhatov; Yrene Gomez-Luque; Sira Ocana-Garcia; Andrew Cook; Joseph Buell; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Christos Dervenis; Giuseppe Fusai; David Geller; Hauke Lang; John Primrose; Mark Taylor; Thomas Van Gulik; Go Wakabayashi; Horacio Asbun; Daniel Cherqui
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Reference values of liver volume in Caucasian population and factors influencing liver size.

Authors:  M L Kromrey; T Ittermann; C vWahsen; V Plodeck; D Seppelt; R T Hoffmann; P Heiss; J P Kühn
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2018-07-07       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 7.  Chemotherapy-associated hepatotoxicity and surgery for colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  D Zorzi; A Laurent; T M Pawlik; G Y Lauwers; J-N Vauthey; E K Abdalla
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Impact of anthropometric data on technical difficulty of laparoscopic liver of resections of segments 7 and 8: the CHALLENGE index.

Authors:  Nadia Russolillo; Cecilia Maina; Serena Langella; Roberto Lo Tesoriere; Michele Casella; Alessandro Ferrero
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Laparoscopic liver resection: Experience based guidelines.

Authors:  Fabricio Ferreira Coelho; Jaime Arthur Pirola Kruger; Gilton Marques Fonseca; Raphael Leonardo Cunha Araújo; Vagner Birk Jeismann; Marcos Vinícius Perini; Renato Micelli Lupinacci; Ivan Cecconello; Paulo Herman
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-01-27

10.  Totally laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy exposing the major hepatic veins from the root side: a case of the right anterior sectorectomy (with video).

Authors:  Goro Honda; Masanao Kurata; Yukihiro Okuda; Shin Kobayashi; Katsunori Sakamoto; Keiichi Takahashi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.452

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.