| Literature DB >> 30918270 |
Afzal Hussain1, Mohamed Fahad AlAjmi1, Md Tabish Rehman1, Samira Amir2, Fohad Mabood Husain3, Ali Alsalme4, Maqsood Ahmad Siddiqui5, Abdulaziz A AlKhedhairy5, Rais Ahmad Khan6.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30918270 PMCID: PMC6437194 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-41063-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Outline of the synthesis of the Schiff base ligand and structures of the ternary complexes.
Figure 2Quenching in the fluorescence of HSA in the presence of copper complex 1. The inset shows a progressive decrease in the fluorescence intensity with increasing concentration of 1.
Fluorescence quenching parameters of HSA in the presence of metal complexes.
| Complex |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.786 | 6.63 | 1.04 | 0.60 |
| 2 | 3.689 | 6.46 | 1.12 | 1.52 |
| 3 | 3.663 | 6.42 | 1.09 | 1.11 |
Figure 3(a) Three-dimensional fluorescence of HSA in the presence and absence of metal complexes (b) Contour maps depicting three-dimensional fluorescence of HSA in the presence and absence of copper complex 1.
Three-dimensional fluorescence characteristics between HSA and metal complexes.
| HSA/Compound | Peak No. | Peak position [λex/λem (nm/nm)] | Intensity of the peak | Relative peak intensity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HSA only | 1 | 280/335 | 6079 | 100 |
| 2 | 230/311 | 5164 | 100 | |
| HSA-Compound | 1 | 280/309 | 4589 | 76 |
| 2 | 230/307 | 3040 | 59 | |
| HSA-Compound | 1 | 280/309 | 4581 | 75 |
| 2 | 230/306 | 3084 | 60 | |
| HSA-Compound | 1 | 280/308 | 4483 | 74 |
| 2 | 230/305 | 3158 | 61 |
Figure 4FRET between HSA and copper complex 1.
FRET parameters for HSA-metal complex system.
| Compound | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.45 | 3.02 | 3.39 | 33.2 |
| 2 | 2.51 | 2.87 | 3.44 | 25.1 |
| 3 | 1.99 | 2.76 | 2.98 | 38.4 |
Figure 5Molecular docking of HSA with different metal complexes. (A) HSA-1, (B) HSA-2, and (C) HSA-3 complex.
Molecular interactions of HSA with metal complexes.
| Metal complex | Docking score | No. of interactions | Interaction | Nature of interaction | Distance (Å) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complex 1 | −336.93 | 10 | Unk:H-Leu115:O | Hydrogen bond | 2.08 |
| Arg114:NH1-Unk | Electrostatic (π-cation) | 4.17 | |||
| Arg114:NH1-Unk | Electrostatic (π-cation) | 3.19 | |||
| Arg117:NH2-Unk | Electrostatic (π-cation) | 4.55 | |||
| Arg186:NH1-Unk | Electrostatic (π-cation) | 3.35 | |||
| Arg114-Unk | Hydrophobic (π-alkyl) | 4.18 | |||
| Unk-Leu115 | Hydrophobic (π-alkyl) | 3.99 | |||
| Unk-Arg114 | Hydrophobic (π-alkyl) | 5.34 | |||
| Unk-Lys190 | Hydrophobic (π-alkyl) | 4.21 | |||
| Unk-Arg117 | Hydrophobic (π-alkyl) | 4.81 | |||
| Complex 2 | −238.11 | 3 | Val469-Unk | Hydrophobic (π-alkyl) | 4.58 |
| Unk-Val469 | Hydrophobic (π-alkyl) | 5.04 | |||
| Unk-Val469 | Hydrophobic (π-alkyl) | 3.97 | |||
| Complex 3 | −221.07 | 3 | Unk:H-Glu442:OE1 | Hydrogen bond | 3.09 |
| Lys378: NZ-Unk | Electrostatic (π-cation) | 4.89 | |||
| Val381-Unk | Hydrophobic (π-alkyl) | 4.85 |
Figure 6Cytotoxicity assessment by MTT assay and morphological changes induced by copper complexes in MCF7 cells. Cells were exposed to different concentrations of copper complexes for 24 h. Morphological images were grabbed using a phase contrast microscope at 20x magnifications. White arrows in the images showing the apoptotic cells. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.005, ***p < 0.001 vs control.
Figure 7Percent change in glutathione level in MCF-7 cells exposed to copper complexes for 24 h. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.005, ***p < 0.001 vs control. The results of depletion in the glutathione level in cultured MCF-7 cells exposed to Cu(II) complexes (1–3) for 24 h are summarized in Fig. 7. The results confirm a significant decrease in GSH level and were found the maximum in case of complex 3 to 60–80% at a lower concentration of 10 and 25 µM, respectively in MCF-7 cells as compared to control. Whereas the other two complexes 1 (50 and 100 µM) and 2 (25 and 50 µM) have shown significant depletion of GSH level but at quite higher concentration.
Figure 8Percentage change in lipid peroxidation in MCF-7 cells exposed to copper complexes for 24 h. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.005, ***p < 0.001 vs control.
Figure 9Effects of C1 (1), C2 (2), and C3 (3) on acetic acid-induced pain (algesia). Results are presented as mean ± SEM, n = 6. Readings for each group were compared with pretreatment (0 min-the control) reading. Paracetamol (PA) was used as standard (positive control) and dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) as vehicle control. ****p < 0.001, ***p < 0.005, *p < 0.05, ANOVA with Dunnett’s as post hoc test N = 6.
Figure 11Effect of different doses of C1, C2 and C3 on carrageenan-induced paw edema in rats. Results are presented in mean ± SD compared with carrageenan group (control group), n = 6. Diclofenac was used as standard (positive control) and dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) as vehicle control. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005, ****p < 0.001, ANOVA with dunnett’s as post Hoc test N = 6.
Figure 10Effects of C1 (1), C2 (2), and C3 (3) on yeast-induced hyperthermia. Results are presented as mean ± SEM. Readings for each group were compared with pretreatment (0 min-the control) reading. Paracetamol (PA) was used as standard (positive control) and dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) as vehicle control. ****p < 0.001, *p < 0.05, ANOVA with Tukey’s as post hoc test N = 6.
Figure 12Molecular docking of COX-2 with different copper(II) complexes.
Molecular interactions of COX2 with copper(II) complexes.
| Copper(II) complex | Docking score | No. of interactions | Interaction | Nature of interaction | Distance (Å) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complex 1 | −262.98 | 7 | Unk:O-Asn556:OD1 | Hydrogen bond | 2.80 |
| Arg297: HE-Unk | Hydrogen bond | 2.75 | |||
| Arg297:NH2-Unk | Electrostatic (π-cation) | 3.69 | |||
| Arg297:NH2-Unk | Electrostatic (π-cation) | 4.62 | |||
| Arg297:NH2-Unk | Electrostatic + Hydrogen bond (π-cation; π –donor | 4.18 | |||
| Unk: O-Cys555 | Hydrophobic (π-alkyl) | 4.42 | |||
| Unk: O-Cys561 | Hydrophobic (π-alkyl) | 5.02 | |||
| Complex 2 | −374.96 | 6 | Arg46:HH12-Unk:O | Hydrogen bond | 2.38 |
| Glu31: OE2-Unk | Electrostatic (π-anion) | 4.46 | |||
| Asp111:OD1-Unk | Electrostatic (π-anion) | 4.66 | |||
| Asp111:OD1-Unk | Electrostatic (π-anion) | 2.96 | |||
| Unk-Arg46 | Hydrophobic (π-alkyl) | 4.88 | |||
| Unk-Pro113 | Hydrophobic (π-alkyl) | 5.12 | |||
| Complex3 | −327.67 | 11 | Arg46:HH12-Unk:O | Hydrogen bond | 2.08 |
| Ser112:HN-Unk: N | Hydrogen bond | 2.18 | |||
| Unk: H-Ser112:O | Hydrogen bond | 2.36 | |||
| Arg29:NH1-Unk | Electrostatic (π-cation) | 3.83 | |||
| Arg29:NH2-Unk | Electrostatic (π-cation) | 4.95 | |||
| Arg46:NH1-Unk | Electrostatic (π-cation) | 4.39 | |||
| Asp111:OD1-Unk | Electrostatic (π-anion) | 4.78 | |||
| Asp111:OD1-Unk | Electrostatic (π-anion) | 4.96 | |||
| Asp111:OD1-Unk | Electrostatic (π-anion) | 4.26 | |||
| Unk-Arg46 | Hydrophobic (π-alkyl) | 4.34 | |||
| Unk-Arg46 | Hydrophobic (π-alkyl) | 5.47 |