| Literature DB >> 30917545 |
Chang Ha Park1, Hyeon Ji Yeo2, Thanislas Bastin Baskar3, Ye Eun Park4, Jong Seok Park5, Sook Young Lee6, Sang Un Park7.
Abstract
Traditionally, Agastache rugosa (Korean mint) has been widely used to treat various infectious diseases. The aims of this study were to: (i) determine the phenylpropanoid content of the plant using high-performance liquid chromatography; (ii) undertake total anthocyanin, flavonoid, and phenolic assays; (iii) and evaluate the antioxidant and antibacterial properties of the methanol extracts from the stem, leaves, and flowers of Korean mint. The total anthocyanin, flavonoid, and phenolic content assays showed that the flowers had higher phenolic levels than the stem and leaves. The reducing power, the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl superoxide radical scavenging abilities, and the hydrogen peroxide radical scavenging activities were also evaluated so that the antioxidant activities of the extracts from the different plant parts could be evaluated. The flower extracts revealed higher antioxidant properties than the other parts. The antibacterial properties of the methanol extracts from A. rugosa were analyzed by the disc diffusion method, and the flower extracts had higher antibacterial activities against the six bacterial strains used in the study than the other parts. This study provides information on the synergistic antioxidant and antibacterial properties of phenolics derived from the different parts of Korean mint.Entities:
Keywords: Korean mint; antibacterial activity; antioxidant activity; phenolics
Year: 2019 PMID: 30917545 PMCID: PMC6466538 DOI: 10.3390/antiox8030075
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Total phenolics, flavonoid, and anthocyanin of the stem, leaves, and flowers of A. rugosa.
| Organ | Total Phenolics | Total Flavonoid | Total Anthocynin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flower | 24.53 ± 1.01 a | 18.52 ± 1.23 a | 0.22 ± 0.09 a |
| Leaf | 17.57 ± 0.91 b | 16.91 ± 0.23 b | 0.10 ± 0.02 b |
| Stem | 7.65 ± 1.21 c | 8.17 ± 0.47 c | 0.01 ± 0.00 b |
Mean values with a different letters (a, b, and c, respectively) were significantly different (p < 0.05, ANOVA, DMRT) in the columns. DMRT: Duncan’s multiple range test, GAE/g dw: gallic acid equivalent per gram of dry weight; RE/g dw: rutin equivalent per gram of dry weight; CGE/g dw: cyanidin-3-glucoside equivalents per gram dry weight.
The accumulation of phenolic compounds in the stem, leaves, and flowers of A. rugosa.
| Organ | Phenolic Compounds (mg/g dw) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catechin | Chlorogenic Acid | Caffeic Acid | Ferulic Acid | Rutin | Kaempferol | Total | |
| Flower | 0.014 ± 0.005 b | 0.011 ± 0.006 b | 0.267 ± 0.001 b | 0.815 ± 0.001 b | 0.061 ± 0.009 ab | 0.137 ± 0.007 a | 1.305 ± 0.024 b |
| Leaf | 0.148 ± 0.005 a | 0.027 ± 0.021 b | 0.327 ± 0.030 a | 0.830 ± 0.001 a | 0.081 ± 0.012 a | 0.157 ± 0.021 a | 1.570 ± 0.064 a |
| Stem | 0.004 ± 0.003 c | 0.103 ± 0.010 a | 0.272 ± 0.003 b | ND | 0.053 ± 0.013 b | ND | 0.433 ± 0.022 c |
Mean values with a different letters (a, b, and c, respectively) were significantly different (p < 0.05, ANOVA, DMRT) in the columns. ND: not detected.
Figure 1Representative image showing antibacterial activity against a bacterial pathogen. A—antibiotic (Streptomycin); C—control (methanol); F, L, and S are methanolic extracts; F—flower extract, L—leaf extract, and S—stem extract.
Antibacterial activity of the methanol extracts of stem, leaves, and flowers, of A. rugosa.
| Bacterial Strain | Zone of Inhibition (mm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flower | Leaf | Stem | Streptomycin | |
| 18.3 ± 0.5 b | 14.0 ± 1.0 c | 11.0 ± 1.0 d | 27.6 ± 0.6 a | |
|
| 16.6 ± 0.5 b | 12.0 ± 1.0 c | 8.0 ± 1.0 d | 26.3 ± 0.6 a |
|
| 17.0 ± 1.0 b | 14.6 ± 0.5 c | 7.6 ± 0.5 d | 27.0 ± 0.0 a |
| 16.3 ± 1.5 b | 13.6 ± 1.5 c | 10.0 ± 1.0 d | 28.3 ± 0.6 a | |
|
| 15.0 ± 1.0 b | 12.0 ± 1.7 c | 9.3 ± 0.5 d | 25.6 ± 0.6 a |
|
| 16.6 ± 0.5 b | 9.3 ± 0.5 c | 8.0 ± 1.0 c | 27.0 ± 1.0 a |
Mean values with a different letters (a, b, c, and d, respectively) were significantly different (p < 0.05, ANOVA, DMRT) in the columns.
Figure 2Antioxidant activity of the methanol extracts of stem, leaves, and flowers of A. rugosa. (a) Reducing power assay; (b) DPPH radical scavenging assay; (c) Hydrogen peroxide radical scavenging assay; (d) Superoxide radical scavenging assay. All of the values in the figure are expressed as means (%) of triplicated experiments and standard deviation of three experiments. Mean values with a different letters (a, b, c, and d, respectively) were significantly different (p < 0.05, ANOVA, DMRT).