| Literature DB >> 30914681 |
Marta Querol-Vilaseca1,2, Martí Colom-Cadena1,2, Jordi Pegueroles1,2, Raúl Nuñez-Llaves1,2, Joan Luque-Cabecerans1,2, Laia Muñoz-Llahuna1,2, Jordi Andilla3, Olivia Belbin1,2, Tara L Spires-Jones4, Ellen Gelpi5,6, Jordi Clarimon1,2, Pablo Loza-Alvarez3, Juan Fortea1,2, Alberto Lleó7,8.
Abstract
Soluble amyloid-β (Aβ) is considered to be a critical component in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Evidence suggests that these non-fibrillar Aβ assemblies are implicated in synaptic dysfunction, neurodegeneration and cell death. However, characterization of these species comes mainly from studies in cellular or animal models, and there is little data in intact human samples due to the lack of adequate optical microscopic resolution to study these small structures. Here, to achieve super-resolution in all three dimensions, we applied Array Tomography (AT) and Stimulated Emission Depletion microscopy (STED), to characterize in postmortem human brain tissue non-fibrillar Aβ structures in amyloid plaques of cases with autosomal dominant and sporadic AD. Ultrathin sections scanned with super-resolution STED microscopy allowed the detection of small Aβ structures of the order of 100 nm. We reconstructed a whole human amyloid plaque and established that plaques are formed by a dense core of higher order Aβ species (~0.022 µm3) and a peripheral halo of smaller Aβ structures (~0.003 µm3). This work highlights the potential of AT-STED for human neuropathological studies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30914681 PMCID: PMC6435662 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-41443-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Quantification of total and non-fibrillar Aβ in ADAD and eoSAD cases. (A–I) Representative images of total Aβ and NAB61 immunoreactivity of ADAD, eoSAD and control cases. Strong immunoreactivity for both markers in consecutive sections from ADAD and eoSAD cases was found. Scale bar = 50 µm and 10 µm for inset. (J,K) Total Aβ and NAB61 densities were increased in both AD groups compared with controls. (L) No differences were found in the ratio NAB61/total Aβ between ADAD and eoSAD. ***p < 0.001.
Figure 2Comparison of the resolution between AT-Confocal and AT-STED modalities. (A,G) Maximal projection of a 3D reconstruction of an amyloid beta plaque in AT-Confocal and AT-STED respectively. (B,H) Image of a single slice of the amyloid-β plaque. (C–F; I–L) insets. (M,N) Scale bar = 10 µm, 1 µm for inset 1 and 0,5 µm for inset 2. Frequency domain representation of B and H. (O) Radial average of the frequency information for the AT-Confocal and AT-STED cases. (P,Q) Difference between of the radial frequency information between modalities. Green lines show the theoretical diffraction limit for 1.4NA objective.
Figure 3Nanoscale architecture of an entire human amyloid plaque using AT-STED. Reconstruction of 368 consecutive sections of an amyloid plaque from a SAD case. Zoom during the video shows the non-fibrilar Aβ structures better resolved in STED compared to confocal microscopy.
Figure 4Distribution and quantification of non-fibrillar Aβ structures using AT-Confocal vs AT-STED. (A,D) Representative images of a human amyloid beta plaque and the surrounding neuronal structures (neurofilament light magenta) using (A) AT alone or (D) AT-STED. (B,E) Images of a segmented 2D projection of the Aβ plaque and (C,F) the respective 3D insets. Each color indicates a different Aβ structure’s size: large (>0,015 µm3; blue), medium (>0,006 < 0,015 µm3; green) and small (<0,006 µm3; red). Detection of a dense core formed by large Aβ structures and a halo around the plaque formed by medium and small Aβ entities. Scale bar = 10 µm and 1 µm for the inset. (G) AT-Confocal and AT-STED distribution of NAB61 structures.
Figure 5Non-fibrillar Aβ structures are increased in an ADAD case. (A–F) Representative images of non-fibrillar Aβ structures distribution and size identified in plaques of an ADAD (n = 8) and a SAD (n = 5) case using AT-STED. Neurofilament light protein (magenta) was stained to visualize the neuronal distribution around the plaques. Scale bar = 10 µm and 1 µm for the inset. (G) ADAD and SAD distribution of NAB61 structures number by size. Differences were found between both distributions (p < 0.001). (H) All Aβ entities were significantly increased in ADAD compared to SAD case (p < 0.001).