Literature DB >> 30912956

Reduced motion and improved rectal dosimetry through endorectal immobilization for prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Jeremiah de Leon1, Michael G Jameson2,3,4, David Rivest-Henault5, Sarah Keats2, Robba Rai2, Sankar Arumugam2, Lee Wilton6, Diana Ngo2, Gary Liney2,3,4, Daniel Moses4, Jason Dowling5, Jarad Martin6,7, Mark Sidhom2,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: PROMETHEUS (ACTRN12615000223538) is a multicentre clinical trial investigating the feasibility of 19 Gy in 2 fractions of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as a boost technique for prostate cancer. The objective of this substudy was to evaluate intrafraction motion using cine MRI and assess the dosimetric impact of using a rectal displacement device (RDD).
METHODS: The initial 10 patients recruited underwent planning CT and MRI, with and without a RDD. Cine MRI images were captured using an interleaved T2 HASTE sequence in sagittal and axial planes with a temporal resolution of 5.2 s acquired over 4.3 min. Points of interest (POIs) were defined and a validated tracking algorithm measured displacement of these points over the 4.3 min in the anteroposterior, superior-inferior and left-right directions. Plans were generated with and without a RDD to examine the impact on dosimetry.
RESULTS: There was an overall trend for increasing displacement in all directions as time progressed when no RDD was in situ . points of interest remained comparatively stable with the RDD. In the sagittal plane, the RDD resulted in statistically significant improvement in the range of anteroposterior displacement for the rectal wall, anterior prostate, prostate apex and base. Dosimetrically, the use of a RDD significantly reduced rectal V16, V14 and Dmax, as well as the percentage of posterior rectal wall receiving 8.5 Gy.
CONCLUSION: The RDD used in stereotactic prostate radiotherapy leads to reduced intrafraction motion of the prostate and rectum, with increasing improvement with time. It also results in significant improvement in rectal wall dosimetry. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: It was found that the rectal displacement device improved prostate stabilization significantly, improved rectum stabilization and dosimetry significantly. The rectal displacement device did not improve target volume dosimetry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30912956      PMCID: PMC6592081          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  22 in total

1.  Evaluating the effect of rectal distension and rectal movement on prostate gland position using cine MRI.

Authors:  A R Padhani; V S Khoo; J Suckling; J E Husband; M O Leach; D P Dearnaley
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Diffeomorphic demons: efficient non-parametric image registration.

Authors:  Tom Vercauteren; Xavier Pennec; Aymeric Perchant; Nicholas Ayache
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Surgical considerations in regard to Denonvilliers' fascia.

Authors:  Nobuki Furubayashi; Motonobu Nakamura; Yoshifumi Hori; Ken Hishikawa; Ken-Iti Nishiyama; Yoshihiro Hasegawa
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Comparison of PSA relapse-free survival in patients treated with ultra-high-dose IMRT versus combination HDR brachytherapy and IMRT.

Authors:  Israel Deutsch; Michael J Zelefsky; Zhigang Zhang; Qianxing Mo; Marco Zaider; Gil'ad Cohen; Oren Cahlon; Yoshiya Yamada
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Fractionation and protraction for radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  D J Brenner; E J Hall
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Prostate gland motion assessed with cine-magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI).

Authors:  Michel J Ghilezan; David A Jaffray; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; Marcel Van Herk; Anil Shetty; Michael B Sharpe; Syed Zafar Jafri; Frank A Vicini; Richard C Matter; Donald S Brabbins; Alvaro A Martinez
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Observations on real-time prostate gland motion using electromagnetic tracking.

Authors:  Katja M Langen; Twyla R Willoughby; Sanford L Meeks; Anand Santhanam; Alexis Cunningham; Lisa Levine; Patrick A Kupelian
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 8.  Higher-than-conventional radiation doses in localized prostate cancer treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.

Authors:  Gustavo Arruda Viani; Eduardo Jose Stefano; Sergio Luis Afonso
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Defining a dose-response relationship for prostate external beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yuvnik Trada; Ash Plank; Jarad Martin
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 1.735

10.  Stereotactic body radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: pooled analysis from a multi-institutional consortium of prospective phase II trials.

Authors:  Christopher R King; Debra Freeman; Irving Kaplan; Donald Fuller; Giampaolo Bolzicco; Sean Collins; Robert Meier; Jason Wang; Patrick Kupelian; Michael Steinberg; Alan Katz
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 6.280

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of rectal displacement devices in managing prostate motion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mahdieh Afkhami Ardekani; Hamed Ghaffari; Mahmoud Navaser; Seyed Hamid Zoljalali Moghaddam; Soheila Refahi
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Urethra Sparing With Target Motion Mitigation in Dose-Escalated Extreme Hypofractionated Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy: 7-Year Results From a Phase II Study.

Authors:  Carlo Greco; Oriol Pares; Nuno Pimentel; Vasco Louro; Beatriz Nunes; Justyna Kociolek; Joep Stroom; Sandra Vieira; Dalila Mateus; Maria Joao Cardoso; Ana Soares; Joao Marques; Elda Freitas; Graça Coelho; Zvi Fuks
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Intrafraction Prostate Motion Management for Ultra-Hypofractionated Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Christoph Oehler; Nina Roehner; Marcin Sumila; Jürgen Curschmann; Fabrizio Storelli; Daniel Rudolf Zwahlen; Uwe Schneider
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Clinical Effect of Radiotherapy Combined with Capecitabine after Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Qibo Zhang; Haibin Teng
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 4.375

5.  In regard to Cuccia et al.: impact of hydrogel peri-rectal spacer insertion on prostate gland intra-fraction motion during 1.5 T MR-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Authors:  Hamed Ghaffari; Mahmoud Navaser; Soheila Refahi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Clinical effects of rectal retractor application in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Amir Mohammad Arefpour; Mahshid Abbasi; Seied Rabi Mahdavi; Mahdiyeh Shafieesabet; Pedram Fadavi
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2021-05-31

7.  Studies of Intra-Fraction Prostate Motion During Stereotactic Irradiation in First Irradiation and Re-Irradiation.

Authors:  Alexandre Taillez; Andre-Michel Bimbai; Thomas Lacornerie; Marie-Cecile Le Deley; Eric F Lartigau; David Pasquier
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 6.244

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.