Literature DB >> 30912721

Cost-effectiveness of Intraoperative MRI for Treatment of High-Grade Gliomas.

Peter Abraham1, Reith Sarkar1, Michael G Brandel1, Arvin R Wali1, Robert C Rennert1, Christian Lopez Ramos1, Jennifer Padwal1, Jeffrey A Steinberg1, David R Santiago-Dieppa1, Vincent Cheung1, J Scott Pannell1, James D Murphy1, Alexander A Khalessi1.   

Abstract

Background Intraoperative MRI has been shown to improve gross-total resection of high-grade glioma. However, to the knowledge of the authors, the cost-effectiveness of intraoperative MRI has not been established. Purpose To construct a clinical decision analysis model for assessing intraoperative MRI in the treatment of high-grade glioma. Materials and Methods An integrated five-state microsimulation model was constructed to follow patients with high-grade glioma. One-hundred-thousand patients treated with intraoperative MRI were compared with 100 000 patients who were treated without intraoperative MRI from initial resection and debulking until death (median age at initial resection, 55 years). After the operation and treatment of complications, patients existed in one of three health states: progression-free survival (PFS), progressive disease, or dead. Patients with recurrence were offered up to two repeated resections. PFS, valuation of health states (utility values), probabilities, and costs were obtained from randomized controlled trials whenever possible. Otherwise, national databases, registries, and nonrandomized trials were used. Uncertainty in model inputs was assessed by using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. A health care perspective was used for this analysis. A willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained was used to determine cost efficacy. Results Intraoperative MRI yielded an incremental benefit of 0.18 QALYs (1.34 QALYs with intraoperative MRI vs 1.16 QALYs without) at an incremental cost of $13 447 ($176 460 with intraoperative MRI vs $163 013 without) in microsimulation modeling, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $76 442 per QALY. Because of parameter distributions, probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that intraoperative MRI had a 99.5% chance of cost-effectiveness at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per QALY. Conclusion Intraoperative MRI is likely to be a cost-effective modality in the treatment of high-grade glioma. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Bettmann in this issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30912721      PMCID: PMC6543900          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019182095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   29.146


  50 in total

1.  CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2009-2013.

Authors:  Quinn T Ostrom; Haley Gittleman; Jordan Xu; Courtney Kromer; Yingli Wolinsky; Carol Kruchko; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Updating cost-effectiveness--the curious resilience of the $50,000-per-QALY threshold.

Authors:  Peter J Neumann; Joshua T Cohen; Milton C Weinstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The cost-effectiveness of tumor-treating fields therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Authors:  F Bernard-Arnoux; M Lamure; F Ducray; G Aulagner; J Honnorat; X Armoiry
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  The Cost of Brain Surgery: Awake vs Asleep Craniotomy for Perirolandic Region Tumors.

Authors:  Chikezie I Eseonu; Jordina Rincon-Torroella; Karim ReFaey; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Predictors of inpatient death and complications among postoperative elderly patients with metastatic brain tumors.

Authors:  Rachel Grossman; Debraj Mukherjee; David C Chang; Michael Purtell; Michael Lim; Henry Brem; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 6.  The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  R Garside; M Pitt; R Anderson; G Rogers; M Dyer; S Mealing; M Somerville; A Price; K Stein
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.014

7.  Incidence, cost, and mortality of neutropenia hospitalization associated with chemotherapy.

Authors:  Vincent Caggiano; Richard V Weiss; Timothy S Rickert; Walter T Linde-Zwirble
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Carmustine implants for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas: a cost-utility analysis.

Authors:  Gabriel Rogers; Ruth Garside; Stuart Mealing; Martin Pitt; Rob Anderson; Matthew Dyer; Ken Stein; Margaret Somerville
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  A pilot cost-effectiveness analysis of treatments in newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas: the example of 5-aminolevulinic Acid compared with white-light surgery.

Authors:  Susana Esteves; Marta Alves; Marta Castel-Branco; Walter Stummer
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Health State Utilities for Patients with Brain Metastases.

Authors:  Nataniel H Lester-Coll; Arie P Dosoretz; James A Hayman; James B Yu
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2016-07-04
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Intraoperative MRI versus intraoperative ultrasound in pediatric brain tumor surgery: is expensive better than cheap? A review of the literature.

Authors:  Carlo Giussani; Andrea Trezza; Vittorio Ricciuti; Andrea Di Cristofori; Andrea Held; Valeria Isella; Maura Massimino
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 1.532

2.  Intraoperative imaging technology to maximise extent of resection for glioma: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniel M Fountain; Andrew Bryant; Damiano Giuseppe Barone; Mueez Waqar; Michael G Hart; Helen Bulbeck; Ashleigh Kernohan; Colin Watts; Michael D Jenkinson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-01-04

3.  Applying machine learning to optical coherence tomography images for automated tissue classification in brain metastases.

Authors:  Jens Möller; Alexander Bartsch; Marcel Lenz; Iris Tischoff; Robin Krug; Hubert Welp; Martin R Hofmann; Kirsten Schmieder; Dorothea Miller
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 4.  Intraoperative MR Imaging during Glioma Resection.

Authors:  Mitsunori Matsumae; Jun Nishiyama; Kagayaki Kuroda
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 2.760

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.