Literature DB >> 20809176

Predictors of inpatient death and complications among postoperative elderly patients with metastatic brain tumors.

Rachel Grossman1, Debraj Mukherjee, David C Chang, Michael Purtell, Michael Lim, Henry Brem, Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Risks of brain surgery in elderly patients with brain metastases are not well defined. This study was designed to quantify the postoperative risk for these patients after brain surgery for metastatic disease to the brain.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (1998-2005). Patients aged 65 years or older who underwent tumor resection of brain metastases were identified by ICD-9 coding. Primary outcome was inpatient death. Other outcomes included systemic postoperative complications, length of stay (LOS), and total charges.
RESULTS: A total of 4,907 patients (53.6% men) were identified. Mean age was 72.1 years. Mean Charlson comorbidity score was 7.8. Inpatient mortality was 4%. The most common adverse events were pulmonary complications (3.4%). Mean length of stay was 9.2 days. Mean total charges were $57,596.39. In multivariate analysis, patients up to age 80 years had no significantly greater odds of inpatient death, relative to their 65- to 69-year-old counterparts. Each 1-point increase in Charlson score was associated with 12% increased odds of death, 0.52 days increased LOS, and $1,710.61 higher hospital charges. Postoperative pulmonary complications, stroke, or thromboembolic events increased LOS and total charges by up to 9.6 days and $57,664.42, respectively. These associations were statistically significant (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection of brain metastases among the elderly up to the ninth decade of life is feasible. Age older than 80 years and higher Charlson comorbidity scores were found to be important prognostic factors for inpatient outcome. Incorporating these factors into preoperative decision making may help to select appropriately those elderly candidates for neurosurgical intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20809176      PMCID: PMC4859207          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1299-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  46 in total

1.  Surgical decision making and elderly patients.

Authors:  B Eiseman
Journal:  Bull Am Coll Surg       Date:  1996-02

2.  Epidemiology of post-operative venous thromboembolism in Asian patients. Results of the SMART venography study.

Authors:  Alain Leizorovicz
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 3.  Metaanalysis of procedural stroke and death among octogenarians: carotid stenting versus carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Asad A Usman; Gale L Tang; Mark K Eskandari
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Is older age associated with a worse prognosis due to different patterns of care? A long-term study of 1346 patients with glioblastomas or brain metastases.

Authors:  Johannes Lutterbach; Susanne Bartelt; Felix Momm; Gerhild Becker; Hermann Frommhold; Christoph Ostertag
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Brain metastases.

Authors:  Andrew D Norden; Patrick Y Wen; Santosh Kesari
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.710

Review 6.  Therapeutic management of brain metastasis.

Authors:  Evert C A Kaal; Charles G J H Niël; Charles J Vecht
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 44.182

7.  Surgical treatment for brain metastases: prognostic factors and survival in 177 patients.

Authors:  Andreas M Stark; Hauke Tscheslog; Ralf Buhl; Janka Held-Feindt; H Maximilian Mehdorn
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2004-12-18       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 8.  Cancer statistics, 2004.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Ram C Tiwari; Taylor Murray; Asma Ghafoor; Alicia Samuels; Elizabeth Ward; Eric J Feuer; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Craniotomy for resection of meningioma in the elderly: a multicentre, prospective analysis from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Chirag G Patil; Anand Veeravagu; Shivanand P Lad; Maxwell Boakye
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Evidence-based clinical practice parameter guidelines for the treatment of patients with metastatic brain tumors: introduction.

Authors:  Steven N Kalkanis; Mark E Linskey
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 4.130

View more
  14 in total

1.  The modified frailty index and 30-day adverse events in oncologic neurosurgery.

Authors:  Brett E Youngerman; Alfred I Neugut; Jingyan Yang; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright; Jeffrey N Bruce
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Clinical characteristics and risk factors of perioperative outcomes in elderly patients with intracranial tumors.

Authors:  Xiaowen Song; Chaofan Zeng; Mingze Wang; Wen Wang; Fa Lin; Qiheng He; Yong Cao; Shuo Wang; Jizong Zhao
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Identifying better surgical candidates among recursive partitioning analysis class 2 patients who underwent surgery for intracranial metastases.

Authors:  Kaisorn L Chaichana; Shami Acharya; Mariana Flores; Olindi Wijesekera; Daniele Rigamonti; Jon D Weingart; Alessandro Olivi; Chetan Bettegowda; Gary L Gallia; Henry Brem; Michael Lim; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 2.104

4.  Patients undergoing surgery of intracranial metastases have different outcomes based on their primary pathology.

Authors:  Kaisorn L Chaichana; Shekhar Gadkaree; Karthik Rao; Thomas Link; Daniele Rigamonti; Michael Purtell; Ilene Browner; Jon Weingart; Alessandro Olivi; Gary Gallia; Chetan Bettegowda; Henry Brem; Michael Lim; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 2.448

5.  Impact of remifentanil use on early postoperative outcomes following brain tumor resection or rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Kanji Uchida; Hideo Yasunaga; Hiroaki Miyata; Masahiko Sumitani; Hiromasa Horiguchi; Shinya Matsuda; Yoshitsugu Yamada
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  The influence of preoperative dependency on mortality, functional recovery and complications after microsurgical resection of intracranial tumors.

Authors:  Martin N Stienen; David Y Zhang; Morgan Broggi; Dominik Seggewiss; Stefano Villa; Silvia Schiavolin; Oliver Bozinov; Niklaus Krayenbühl; Johannes Sarnthein; Paolo Ferroli; Luca Regli
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Survival and recurrence for patients undergoing surgery of skull base intracranial metastases.

Authors:  Kaisorn L Chaichana; Mariana Flores; Shami Acharya; Paul Sampognaro; Chetan Bettegowda; Daniele Rigamonti; Jon D Weingart; Alessandro Olivi; Gary L Gallia; Henry Brem; Michael Lim; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2013-04-03

8.  Cost-effectiveness of Intraoperative MRI for Treatment of High-Grade Gliomas.

Authors:  Peter Abraham; Reith Sarkar; Michael G Brandel; Arvin R Wali; Robert C Rennert; Christian Lopez Ramos; Jennifer Padwal; Jeffrey A Steinberg; David R Santiago-Dieppa; Vincent Cheung; J Scott Pannell; James D Murphy; Alexander A Khalessi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 29.146

9.  The Clinical Frailty Scale as useful tool in patients with brain metastases.

Authors:  Johannes Kerschbaumer; Aleksandrs Krigers; Matthias Demetz; Daniel Pinggera; Julia Klingenschmid; Nadine Pichler; Claudius Thomé; Christian F Freyschlag
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.506

Review 10.  Management of brain metastases in elderly patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  Joanna Socha; Anna Rychter; Lucyna Kepka
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 3.005

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.