Literature DB >> 30911193

A Short Note on Obtaining Point Estimates of the IRT Ability Parameter With MCMC Estimation in Mplus: How Many Plausible Values Are Needed?

Yong Luo1, Dimiter M Dimitrov1,2.   

Abstract

Plausible values can be used to either estimate population-level statistics or compute point estimates of latent variables. While it is well known that five plausible values are usually sufficient for accurate estimation of population-level statistics in large-scale surveys, the minimum number of plausible values needed to obtain accurate latent variable point estimates is unclear. This is especially relevant when an item response theory (IRT) model is estimated with MCMC (Markov chain Monte Carlo) methods in Mplus and point estimates of the IRT ability parameter are of interest, as Mplus only estimates the posterior distribution of each ability parameter. In order to obtain point estimates of the ability parameter, a number of plausible values can be drawn from the posterior distribution of each individual ability parameter and their mean (the posterior mean ability estimate) can be used as an individual ability point estimate. In this note, we conducted a simulation study to investigate how many plausible values were needed to obtain accurate posterior mean ability estimates. The results indicate that 20 is the minimum number of plausible values required to obtain point estimates of the IRT ability parameter that are comparable to marginal maximum likelihood estimation(MMLE)/expected a posteriori (EAP) estimates. A real dataset was used to demonstrate the comparison between MMLE/EAP point estimates and posterior mean ability estimates based on different number of plausible values.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EAP; IRT ability estimation; MCMC; MMLE; plausible value

Year:  2018        PMID: 30911193      PMCID: PMC6425093          DOI: 10.1177/0013164418777569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0013-1644            Impact factor:   2.821


  7 in total

1.  Empirical Comparison Between Factor Analysis and Multidimensional Item Response Models.

Authors:  D L Knol; M P Berger
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1991-07-01       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Item factor analysis: current approaches and future directions.

Authors:  R J Wirth; Michael C Edwards
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2007-03

3.  A power primer.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Estimation of IRT graded response models: limited versus full information methods.

Authors:  Carlos G Forero; Alberto Maydeu-Olivares
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2009-09

5.  A Short Note on Estimating the Testlet Model With Different Estimators in Mplus.

Authors:  Yong Luo
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 2.821

6.  Using the Stan Program for Bayesian Item Response Theory.

Authors:  Yong Luo; Hong Jiao
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.821

7.  Estimation of an IRT Model by Mplus for Dichotomously Scored Responses Under Different Estimation Methods.

Authors:  Insu Paek; Mengyao Cui; Neşe Öztürk Gübeş; Yanyun Yang
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.821

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.