Literature DB >> 30910857

Direct healthcare costs of sedentary behaviour in the UK.

Leonie Heron1, Ciaran O'Neill2, Helen McAneney2, Frank Kee2, Mark A Tully3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Growing evidence indicates that prolonged sedentary behaviour increases the risk of several chronic health conditions and all-cause mortality. Sedentary behaviour is prevalent among adults in the UK. Quantifying the costs associated with sedentary behaviour is an important step in the development of public health policy.
METHODS: National Health Service (NHS) costs associated with prolonged sedentary behaviour (≥6 hours/day) were estimated over a 1-year period in 2016-2017 costs. We calculated a population attributable fraction (PAF) for five health outcomes (type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease [CVD], colon cancer, endometrial cancer and lung cancer). Adjustments were made for potential double-counting due to comorbidities. We also calculated the avoidable deaths due to prolonged sedentary behaviour using the PAF for all-cause mortality.
RESULTS: The total NHS costs attributable to prolonged sedentary behaviour in the UK in 2016-2017 were £0.8 billion, which included expenditure on CVD (£424 million), type 2 diabetes (£281 million), colon cancer (£30 million), lung cancer (£19 million) and endometrial cancer (£7 million). After adjustment for potential double-counting, the estimated total was £0.7 billion. If prolonged sedentary behaviour was eliminated, 69 276 UK deaths might have been avoided in 2016.
CONCLUSIONS: In this conservative estimate of direct healthcare costs, prolonged sedentary behaviour causes a considerable burden to the NHS in the UK. This estimate may be used by decision makers when prioritising healthcare resources and investing in preventative public health programmes. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cost analysis; health expenditure; healthcare cost; physical activity; public health; sedentary behaviour; sitting time

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30910857     DOI: 10.1136/jech-2018-211758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  22 in total

1.  Economic Evaluation of a Reablement Training Program for Homecare Staff Targeting Sedentary Behavior in Community-Dwelling Older Adults Compared to Usual Care: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Teuni H Rooijackers; Silke F Metzelthin; Erik van Rossum; Gertrudis I J M Kempen; Silvia M A A Evers; Andrea Gabrio; G A Rixt Zijlstra
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 4.458

2.  Economic evaluation of an incentive-based program to increase physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour in middle-aged adults.

Authors:  Jaimie-Lee Maple; Jaithri Ananthapavan; Kylie Ball; Megan Teychenne; Marj Moodie
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 2.908

3.  Engagement with and delivery of the 'parkrun practice initiative' in general practice: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Joanna Fleming; Carol Bryce; Joanne Parsons; Chrissie Wellington; Jeremy Dale
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Economic burden of low physical activity and high sedentary behaviour in Finland.

Authors:  Päivi Kolu; Jaana T Kari; Jani Raitanen; Harri Sievänen; Kari Tokola; Eino Havas; Jaakko Pehkonen; Tuija H Tammelin; Katja Pahkala; Nina Hutri-Kähönen; Olli T Raitakari; Tommi Vasankari
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 6.286

5.  Associations of sedentary time and physical activity with adverse health conditions: Outcome-wide analyses using isotemporal substitution model.

Authors:  Zhi Cao; Chenjie Xu; Pengjie Zhang; Yaogang Wang
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-04-28

6.  Impact of unhealthy lifestyle on cardiorespiratory fitness and heart rate recovery of medical science students.

Authors:  Lampson M Fan; Adam Collins; Li Geng; Jian-Mei Li
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  Contributions of Interactions Between Lifestyle and Genetics on Coronary Artery Disease Risk.

Authors:  M Abdullah Said; Yordi J van de Vegte; Muhammad Mobeen Zafar; M Yldau van der Ende; Ghazala Kaukab Raja; N Verweij; Pim van der Harst
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Changes in Sitting Time, Screen Exposure and Physical Activity during COVID-19 Lockdown in South American Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Kabir P Sadarangani; Gabriela F De Roia; Pablo Lobo; Robinson Chavez; Jacob Meyer; Carlos Cristi-Montero; David Martinez-Gomez; Gerson Ferrari; Felipe B Schuch; Alejandro Gil-Salmerón; Marco Solmi; Nicola Veronese; Hosam Alzahrani; Igor Grabovac; Cristina M Caperchione; Mark A Tully; Lee Smith
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  The association between recreational screen time and cancer risk: findings from the UK Biobank, a large prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ruth F Hunter; Jennifer M Murray; Helen G Coleman
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 6.457

10.  The effectiveness and complexity of interventions targeting sedentary behaviour across the lifespan: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicole E Blackburn; Jason J Wilson; Ilona I McMullan; Paolo Caserotti; Maria Giné-Garriga; Katharina Wirth; Laura Coll-Planas; Sergi Blancafort Alias; Marta Roqué; Manuela Deidda; Andrew T Kunzmann; Dhayana Dallmeier; Mark A Tully
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.