Literature DB >> 32482630

Engagement with and delivery of the 'parkrun practice initiative' in general practice: a mixed methods study.

Joanna Fleming1, Carol Bryce1, Joanne Parsons1, Chrissie Wellington2, Jeremy Dale1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The parkrun practice initiative, a joint collaboration between parkrun and the Royal College of General Practitioners, was launched to encourage general practices to improve the health and wellbeing of patients and staff through participating in local 5 km parkrun events. Why and how practices engage with the initiative is unknown. AIM: To investigate engagement with and delivery of the parkrun practice initiative in general practice. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Mixed methods study conducted from April-July 2019 comprising an online survey of all registered parkrun practices, and interviews and a focus group with practice staff in the West Midlands.
METHOD: The designated contacts at 780 registered parkrun practices were invited to complete an online survey. A purposive sample of parkrun practice staff and non-registered practice staff took part either in semi-structured interviews or a focus group, with transcripts analysed thematically.
RESULTS: Of the total number of parkrun practices, 306 (39.2%) completed the survey. Sixteen practice staff (from nine parkrun practices and four non-registered practices) took part in either semi-structured interviews (n = 12) or a focus group (n = 4). Key motivators for becoming a parkrun practice were: to improve patient and staff health and wellbeing, and to become more engaged with the community and enhance practice image. Practices most commonly encouraged patients, carers, and staff to take part in parkrun and displayed parkrun flyers and posters. Challenges in implementing activities included lack of time (both personal and during consultations) and getting staff involved. Where staff did engage there were positive effects on morale and participation. Non-registered practices were receptive to the initiative, but had apprehensions about the commitment involved.
CONCLUSION: Practices were keen to improve patient and staff health. Addressing time constraints and staff support needs to be considered when implementing the initiative. © British Journal of General Practice 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  General practice; community; engagement; exercise; physical activity; social prescribing

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32482630      PMCID: PMC7274542          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X710453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  18 in total

1.  Prescribing parkrun.

Authors:  Simon Tobin
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Social prescribing: where is the evidence?

Authors:  Kerryn Husk; Julian Elston; Felix Gradinger; Lynne Callaghan; Sheena Asthana
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  parkrun: increasing physical activity in primary care.

Authors:  Joanna Fleming
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  The Evidence in Support of Physicians and Health Care Providers as Physical Activity Role Models.

Authors:  Felipe Lobelo; Isabel Garcia de Quevedo
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2014-01-21

5.  Primary care staff's views and experiences related to routinely advising patients about physical activity. A questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Flora Douglas; Nicola Torrance; Edwin van Teijlingen; Serena Meloni; Ann Kerr
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Rates, Delays, and Completeness of General Practitioners' Responses to a Postal Versus Web-Based Survey: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Paul Sebo; Hubert Maisonneuve; Bernard Cerutti; Jean Pascal Fournier; Nicolas Senn; Dagmar M Haller
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Are physical activity interventions for healthy inactive adults effective in promoting behavior change and maintenance, and which behavior change techniques are effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Neil Howlett; Daksha Trivedi; Nicholas A Troop; Angel Marie Chater
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Exploring the relationship between baseline physical activity levels and mortality reduction associated with increases in physical activity: a modelling study.

Authors:  Jonathan Minton; Munyaradzi Dimairo; Emma Everson-Hock; Emma Scott; Elizabeth Goyder
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 9.  Facilitators and barriers of implementing and delivering social prescribing services: a systematic review.

Authors:  Julia Vera Pescheny; Yannis Pappas; Gurch Randhawa
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Understanding the effectiveness and mechanisms of a social prescribing service: a mixed method analysis.

Authors:  James Woodall; Joanne Trigwell; Ann-Marie Bunyan; Gary Raine; Victoria Eaton; Joanne Davis; Lucy Hancock; Mary Cunningham; Sue Wilkinson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  5 in total

1.  How can GPs get people moving more?

Authors:  Raymond Leung; Katherine Marino; David Whittaker; Dionisio Izquierdo; Dipesh P Gopal
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 6.302

2.  Challenges and Approaches to Green Social Prescribing During and in the Aftermath of COVID-19: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Alison Fixsen; Simon Barrett
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-16

3.  parkrun and the promotion of physical activity: insights for primary care clinicians from an online survey.

Authors:  Steve Haake; Helen Quirk; Alice Bullas
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 6.302

4.  Motivation to Improve Mental Wellbeing via Community Physical Activity Initiatives and the Associated Impacts-A Cross-Sectional Survey of UK parkrun Participants.

Authors:  Allison Dunne; Steve Haake; Helen Quirk; Alice Bullas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Exploring the benefits of participation in community-based running and walking events: a cross-sectional survey of parkrun participants.

Authors:  Helen Quirk; Alice Bullas; Steve Haake; Elizabeth Goyder; Mike Graney; Chrissie Wellington; Robert Copeland; Lindsey Reece; Clare Stevinson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.