Literature DB >> 30909795

Divergent Six Month Functional Recovery Trajectories and Predictors after Traumatic Brain Injury: Novel Insights from the Citicoline Brain Injury Treatment Trial Study.

Raquel C Gardner1,2, Jing Cheng3, Adam R Ferguson4,5,6, Ross Boylan3, John Boscardin3,6,7, Ross D Zafonte8, Geoffrey T Manley4,5.   

Abstract

Cross-sectional approaches to outcome assessment may not adequately capture heterogeneity in recovery after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Using latent class mixed models (LCMM), a data-driven analytic that identifies groups of patients with similar trajectories, we identified distinct 6 month functional recovery trajectories in a large cohort (n = 1046) of adults 18-70 years of age with complicated mild to severe TBI who participated in the Citicoline Brain Injury Treatment Trial (COBRIT). We used multinomial logistic fixed effect models and backward elimination, forward selection, and forward stepwise selection with several stopping rules to explore baseline predictors of functional recovery trajectory. Based on statistical and clinical considerations, the seven-class model was deemed superior. Visualization of these seven functional recovery trajectories revealed that each trajectory class started at one of three recovery levels at 1 month, which, for ease of reference we labeled groups A-C: Group A, good recovery (two classes; A1 and A2); Group B, moderate disability (two classes; B1 and B2); and Group C, severe disability (three classes; C1, C2, and C3). By 6 months, these three groups experienced dramatically divergent trajectories. Group A experienced stable good recovery (A1, n = 115) or dramatic decline (A2, n = 4); Group B experienced rapid complete recovery (B1, n = 71) or gradual recovery (B2, n = 742); Group C experienced dramatic rapid recovery (C1, n = 12), no recovery (C2, n = 91), or death (C3, n = 11). Trajectory class membership was not predicted by citicoline treatment (p = 0.57). The models identified demographic, pre-injury, and injury-related predictors of functional recovery trajectory, including: age, race, education, pre-injury employment, pre-injury diabetes, pre-injury psychiatric disorder, site, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, post-traumatic amnesia, TBI mechanism, major extracranial injury, hemoglobin, and acute computed tomographic (CT) findings. GCS was the most consistently selected predictor across all models. All models also selected at least one demographic or pre-injury medical predictor. LCMM successfully identified dramatically divergent, clinically meaningful 6 month recovery trajectories with utility to inform clinical trial design.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TBI; functional outcome; predictors; trajectory

Year:  2019        PMID: 30909795      PMCID: PMC6709728          DOI: 10.1089/neu.2018.6167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  49 in total

1.  Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use.

Authors:  J T Wilson; L E Pettigrew; G M Teasdale
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Group-based trajectory modeling in clinical research.

Authors:  Daniel S Nagin; Candice L Odgers
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 18.561

3.  Race\ethnicity and outcome after traumatic brain injury at a single, diverse center.

Authors:  Marco D Sorani; Michaela Lee; Helen Kim; Michele Meeker; Geoffrey T Manley
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2009-07

4.  APOE genotype and verbal memory recovery during and after emergence from post-traumatic amnesia.

Authors:  E Noé; J Ferri; C Colomer; B Moliner; J Chirivella
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Validating Multidimensional Outcome Assessment Using the TBI Common Data Elements: An Analysis of the TRACK-TBI Pilot Sample.

Authors:  Lindsay D Nelson; Jana Ranson; Adam R Ferguson; Joseph Giacino; David O Okonkwo; Alex Valadka; Geoffrey Manley; Michael McCrea
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Longitudinal description of the disability rating scale for individuals in the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research traumatic brain injury model systems national database.

Authors:  Christopher R Pretz; James F Malec; Flora M Hammond
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Very early administration of progesterone for acute traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  David W Wright; Sharon D Yeatts; Robert Silbergleit; Yuko Y Palesch; Vicki S Hertzberg; Michael Frankel; Felicia C Goldstein; Angela F Caveney; Harriet Howlett-Smith; Erin M Bengelink; Geoffrey T Manley; Lisa H Merck; L Scott Janis; William G Barsan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Updating memory after mild traumatic brain injury and orthopedic injuries.

Authors:  Gerri Hanten; Xiaoqi Li; Alyssa Ibarra; Elisabeth A Wilde; Amanda Barnes; Stephen R McCauley; James McCarthy; Shkelzen Hoxhaj; Donna Mendez; Jill V Hunter; Harvey S Levin; Douglas H Smith
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 9.  The Glasgow Outcome Scale - 40 years of application and refinement.

Authors:  Tom McMillan; Lindsay Wilson; Jennie Ponsford; Harvey Levin; Graham Teasdale; Michael Bond
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 42.937

10.  Distinct trajectories of multimorbidity in primary care were identified using latent class growth analysis.

Authors:  Vicky Y Strauss; Peter W Jones; Umesh T Kadam; Kelvin P Jordan
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  5 in total

1.  Cognitive Outcome 1 Year After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Results From the TRACK-TBI Study.

Authors:  Andrea L C Schneider; J Russell Huie; W John Boscardin; Lindsay Nelson; Jason K Barber; Kristine Yaffe; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia; Adam R Ferguson; Joel Kramer; Sonia Jain; Nancy Temkin; Esther Yuh; Geoffrey T Manley; Raquel C Gardner
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 2.  Management of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: an update for the intensivist.

Authors:  Geert Meyfroidt; Pierre Bouzat; Michael P Casaer; Randall Chesnut; Sophie Rym Hamada; Raimund Helbok; Peter Hutchinson; Andrew I R Maas; Geoffrey Manley; David K Menon; Virginia F J Newcombe; Mauro Oddo; Chiara Robba; Lori Shutter; Martin Smith; Ewout W Steyerberg; Nino Stocchetti; Fabio Silvio Taccone; Lindsay Wilson; Elisa R Zanier; Giuseppe Citerio
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 41.787

3.  Trajectories of Insomnia in Adults After Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Emerson M Wickwire; Jennifer S Albrecht; Vincent F Capaldi; Sonia O Jain; Raquel C Gardner; J Kent Werner; Pratik Mukherjee; Ashlee B McKeon; Michael T Smith; Joseph T Giacino; Lindsay D Nelson; Scott G Williams; Jacob Collen; Xiaoying Sun; David M Schnyer; Amy J Markowitz; Geoffrey T Manley; Andrew D Krystal
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-01-04

4.  Biofidelic dynamic compression of human cortical spheroids reproduces neurotrauma phenotypes.

Authors:  Aaron R Shoemaker; Ian E Jones; Kira D Jeffris; Gina Gabrielli; Alyssa G Togliatti; Rajeswari Pichika; Eric Martin; Evangelos Kiskinis; Colin K Franz; John D Finan
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 5.758

5.  A Multi-Modal Assessment of Clinical Predictors for Traumatic Brain Injury End-Points.

Authors:  Lin F Zou; Benjamin Pierce; Jessica L Nielson
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 5.269

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.