| Literature DB >> 34746950 |
Aaron R Shoemaker1, Ian E Jones2, Kira D Jeffris2, Gina Gabrielli1, Alyssa G Togliatti3, Rajeswari Pichika4, Eric Martin4, Evangelos Kiskinis5, Colin K Franz3,4,5, John D Finan2.
Abstract
Fundamental questions about patient heterogeneity and human-specific pathophysiology currently obstruct progress towards a therapy for traumatic brain injury (TBI). Human in vitro models have the potential to address these questions. Three-dimensional spheroidal cell culture protocols for human-origin neural cells have several important advantages over their two-dimensional monolayer counterparts. Three-dimensional spheroidal cultures may mature more quickly, develop more biofidelic electrophysiological activity and/or reproduce some aspects of brain architecture. Here, we present the first human in vitro model of non-penetrating TBI employing three-dimensional spheroidal cultures. We used a custom-built device to traumatize these spheroids in a quantifiable, repeatable and biofidelic manner, and correlated the heterogeneous mechanical strain field with the injury phenotype. Trauma reduced cell viability, mitochondrial membrane potential and spontaneous synchronous electrophysiological activity in the spheroids. Electrophysiological deficits emerged at lower injury severities than changes in cell viability. Also, traumatized spheroids secreted lactate dehydrogenase, a marker of cell damage, and neurofilament light chain, a promising clinical biomarker of neurotrauma. These results demonstrate that three-dimensional human in vitro models can reproduce important phenotypes of neurotrauma in vitro.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990 In vitrozzm321990 ; Human; Spheroid; Traumatic brain injury
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34746950 PMCID: PMC8713991 DOI: 10.1242/dmm.048916
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dis Model Mech ISSN: 1754-8403 Impact factor: 5.758
Fig. 1.Spheroid width accurately predicts spheroid height. (A) Apparatus for imaging a spheroid on horizontal and vertical planes. (B) Bright-field image of spheroid taken from below. (C) Bright-field image of spheroid taken from the side. (D) Linear regression of spheroid height against spheroid minor axis when viewed from below (n=24, P<0.001).
Fig. 2.Dynamic compressive injury of a human cortical spheroid. (A) Custom-built injury device. (B) Exploded view of custom-built injury device. (C) Exploded view of lid, drop-in posts and 96-well plate. (D) Cross-sectional view of spheroids in injury apparatus at the initial position for the injury protocol. A PDMS membrane forms the bottom of the plate but is not shown in this image for clarity. (E) Schematic of the sequence of events during injury. At the start of the injury, the hanging post is touching the top of the spheroid and the indenting post is lightly pressing the PDMS membrane against the bottom of the membrane. The spheroid is therefore held between two effectively rigid surfaces but not compressed. Then, the voice coil drives the indenting post upwards to compress the spheroid. Then, the indenting post lowers to end the pulse of compression.
Fig. 3.Mathematical modeling of strain field in a compressed spheroid. (A) Fluorescent image of a spheroid stained with Calcium 6 (top panel) and automated segmentation of the image (bottom panel) to determine the thickness of the visible region. (B) Finite element model geometry (left panel) and mesh (right panel). (C) Color map of MPS in spheroid at 50% compression, mapped on to the undeformed geometry. LE, logarithmic strain. (D) MPSvisible and MPSwhole for various compression ratios (solid lines represent the fourth order polynomial fit with R2>0.99).
Fig. 4.Trauma impacts cell heath in spheroids and causes them to release injury biomarkers. (A) Maximum intensity projections of confocal images of spheroids labeled with Hoechst 33342, Calcein AM and TMRM, before and after injury. Scale bars: 150 µm. (B) The effect of various levels of trauma (and Triton X-100 treatment) on Calcein AM fluorescent intensity. (C) The effect of various levels of trauma on LDH secretion. (D) The effect of various levels of trauma (and Triton X-100 treatment) on TMRM fluorescence intensity. (E) The effect of various levels of trauma on the secretion of NF-L. Linear regression along with confidence intervals and fit parameters are superimposed on panels B-E. A.U., arbitrary units.
Fig. 5.Electrophysiological changes after trauma. (A) Average intensity projections of time series confocal images of Calcium 6-stained sham and injured spheroids. (B) Typical time series of calcium oscillations from a healthy human cortical spheroid. Black triangles indicate automatically identified peaks in the series. (C) The effect of various levels of trauma on the number of detected peaks. The black line plots a sigmoidal regression (see Supplementary Materials and Methods and Table S3) of the data (R2=0.675). (D) The effect of various levels of trauma on the amplitude of the detected peaks. The black line plots a sigmoidal regression of the data (R2=0. 698). (E) The number of detected peaks after compression to MPSvisible=0.3 at various strain rates. A linear regression is superimposed on the data along with confidence bounds and fit parameters (R2=0.229). (F) The amplitude of detected peaks after compression to MPSvisible=0.3 at various strain rates. A linear regression is superimposed on the data along with confidence bounds and fit parameters (R2=0. 267). A.U., arbitrary units.