Youwen Cui1, Junjie Liu1, Xinping Zhang2. 1. School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China. 2. School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China. Electronic address: xpzhang602@hust.edu.cn.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has become a serious global public health problem. The World Health Organization (WHO) and European Union (EU) have taken actions to combat this issue, in which laboratory capability construction is a crucial part. This study aimed to explore the relationship between laboratory capabilities and antimicrobial resistance from a macro perspective. METHODS: The study used annual national level penal data from the EU Laboratory Capability Monitoring System and Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Europe 2013-2016. A conventional static panel data analysis was constructed to establish the relationship between the antimicrobial resistance rates and laboratory capabilities. RESULTS: Laboratory capability on antimicrobial drug resistance characterisation and monitoring (LC8) showed a positive effect on Escherichia coli (E. coli) combined resistance rate (Y5), E. coli resistant rate of aminoglycosides (Y4), and Klebsiella pneumoniae resistant rate of carbapenems (Y8) (OR=0.929, 0.957, and 0.861; P=0.035, 0.007, and 0.026, respectively). However, following the diagnostic testing guidelines (LC2) caused higher resistance rates of Klebsiella pneumoniae to fluoroquinolones (Y6), third-generation cephalosporins (Y7), and aminoglycosides (Y9) (OR=1.076, 1.093, and1.065; P=0.011, 0.032, and 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobial drug resistance characterisation and monitoring by laboratories has contributed to minimising antimicrobial resistance, while the mechanism of laboratory capabilities to pose an ineffective or negative impact on AMR remains to be further studied.
OBJECTIVES: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has become a serious global public health problem. The World Health Organization (WHO) and European Union (EU) have taken actions to combat this issue, in which laboratory capability construction is a crucial part. This study aimed to explore the relationship between laboratory capabilities and antimicrobial resistance from a macro perspective. METHODS: The study used annual national level penal data from the EU Laboratory Capability Monitoring System and Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Europe 2013-2016. A conventional static panel data analysis was constructed to establish the relationship between the antimicrobial resistance rates and laboratory capabilities. RESULTS: Laboratory capability on antimicrobial drug resistance characterisation and monitoring (LC8) showed a positive effect on Escherichia coli (E. coli) combined resistance rate (Y5), E. coli resistant rate of aminoglycosides (Y4), and Klebsiella pneumoniae resistant rate of carbapenems (Y8) (OR=0.929, 0.957, and 0.861; P=0.035, 0.007, and 0.026, respectively). However, following the diagnostic testing guidelines (LC2) caused higher resistance rates of Klebsiella pneumoniae to fluoroquinolones (Y6), third-generation cephalosporins (Y7), and aminoglycosides (Y9) (OR=1.076, 1.093, and1.065; P=0.011, 0.032, and 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobial drug resistance characterisation and monitoring by laboratories has contributed to minimising antimicrobial resistance, while the mechanism of laboratory capabilities to pose an ineffective or negative impact on AMR remains to be further studied.