| Literature DB >> 34899342 |
Ying Wang1, Xinping Zhang1, Qian Zhou1, Xiaojun Xu2, Xiaofeng Liu2, Shaohui Lu2.
Abstract
Background: The antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) report has guiding significance for physicians to prescribe antibiotics. This study aims to examine the effect of the AST report information complexity on physician's intention to prescribe antibiotics based on the AST report, as well as the mediating role of information overload and attitude.Entities:
Keywords: antibiotic prescription; antimicrobial susceptibility testing report; attitude; behavior intention; information complexity; information overload
Year: 2021 PMID: 34899342 PMCID: PMC8660084 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.778664
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Descriptive statistics and correlation analysis of information overload and attitude between information complexity and behavior intention.
| Variable | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Std. Deviation | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.Information complexity | 2.00 | 5.00 | 4.10 | 0.60 | 1 | |||
| 2.Information overload | 2.00 | 5.00 | 3.30 | 0.65 | 0.20** | 1 | ||
| 3.Attitude | 2.40 | 5.00 | 3.98 | 0.43 | 0.41** | −0.12* | 1 | |
| 4.Behavior intention | 2.60 | 5.00 | 4.04 | 0.49 | 0.39** | 0.15** | 0.42** | 1 |
**p < 0.01: *p < 0.05.
Multiple regression analysis of information overload and attitude between information complexity and behavior intention.
| Regression model | Model fit | Coefficients | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dependent variable | Independent variable | R |
| F | β | t |
| Behavior Intention | Information complexity | 0.173 | 4.326*** | |||
| Information Overload | 0.503 | 0.253 | 45.914 | 0.114 | 3.375*** | |
| Attitude | 0.402 | 7.315*** | ||||
| Attitude | Information complexity | 0.459 | 0.210 | 54.322 | 0.324 | 10.045*** |
| Information Overload | −0.141 | −4.769*** | ||||
| Information Overload | Information complexity | 0.204 | 0.041 | 17.675 | 0.222 | 4.204*** |
p<0.001.
Multiple Mediating Effects Test of information overload and attitude between information complexity and behavior intention.
| Effect | BootSE | BootLLCI | BootULCI | Relative effect | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total effect | 0.315 | 0.045 | 0.225 | 0.403 | − |
| Direct effect | 0.173 | 0.044 | 0.089 | 0.260 | − |
| Total indirect effect | 0.143 | 0.027 | 0.094 | 0.195 | − |
| Indirect 1 | 0.025 | 0.011 | 0.008 | 0.050 | 14.45% |
| Indirect 2 | 0.130 | 0.025 | 0.086 | 0.180 | 75.14% |
| Indirect 3 | −0.013 | 0.004 | −0.023 | −0.005 | 7.51% |
AbbreviationIndirect 1, information complexity → information overload → behavior intention; Indirect 2, information complexity → attitude → behavior intention; Indirect 3, information complexity → information overload → attitude → behavior intention. Effect, standardized regression coefficient; BootSE, bootstrapping standard error; BootLLCI, bootstrapping lower limit confidence interval; BootULCI, bootstrapping upper limit confidence interval.
Note: Relative effect = |Indirect Effect/Direct Effect|*100%.
FIGURE 1Serial multiple mediating model of information complexity, information overload, attitude and behavior intention. *** p < 0.001.