| Literature DB >> 31636561 |
Dandan Zhang1, Youwen Cui1, Xinping Zhang1.
Abstract
Objectives: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has become a One Health problem in which fluoroquinolone resistance has caused great concern. The aim of this study is to estimate factors related to fluoroquinolone resistance involving the professionals and antimicrobial consumption (AMC) in human and animal fields.Entities:
Keywords: Europe; One Health; antimicrobial consumption; fluoroquinolone resistance; medical staff; panel data; veterinarians
Year: 2019 PMID: 31636561 PMCID: PMC6787557 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01145
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Variable definitions and sources.
| Variable name | Definitions | Unit of measure | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| % | European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net) | ||
| MS | The number of medical staff | Number per 100,000 population | Eurostat Database |
| VP | The number of veterinary professionals | Number per 100,000 population | World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) |
| HAMC | Fluoroquinolone consumption in humans | mg/kg | European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption Net (ESAC-Net) |
| VAMC | Fluoroquinolone consumption in food-producing animals | mg/kg | European Surveillance of Veterinary Antimicrobial Consumption Net (ESVAC-Net) |
Figure 1Trends in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) rates among 29 countries from 2005 to 2016.
Summary statistics of variables.
| Variable name | Mean | Std | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 21.03 | 10.40 | 4.68 | 51.85 |
|
| 17.91 | 12.63 | 0 | 61.96 |
| MS | 1,359.76 | 412.50 | 418.22 | 2,258.34 |
| VP | 54.40 | 25.24 | 2.44 | 160.63 |
| HAMC | 7.55 | 4.08 | 2.23 | 26.95 |
| VAMC | 1.99 | 2.86 | 0 | 11.29 |
Std refers to standard deviation.
Figure 2Linear relationships between attributable risk factors and Escherichia coli resistance. Notes: The trend line in each plot denotes the fitted line. (A) The linear relationship between the human antimicrobial consumption and the E. coli resistance rates to FQs (n = 220, P = 0.0000). (B) The linear relationship between the veterinary antimicrobial consumption and the E. coli resistance rates to FQs (n = 211, P = 0.0000). (C) The linear relationship between the medical staff and the E. coli resistance rates to FQs (n = 185, P = 0.0000). (D) The linear relationship between the veterinary professionals and the E. coli resistance rates to FQs (n = 210, P = 0.0000).
Figure 3Linear relationships between attributable risk factors and Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistance. Notes: The trend line in each plot denotes the fitted line. (A) The linear relationship between the human antimicrobial consumption and the P. aeruginosa resistance rates to FQs (n = 215, P = 0.0000). (B) The linear relationship between the veterinary antimicrobial consumption and the P. aeruginosa resistance rates to FQs (n = 207, P = 0.0000). (C) The linear relationship between the medical staff and the P. aeruginosa resistance rates to FQs (n = 181, P = 0.0000). (D) The linear relationship between the veterinary professionals and the P. aeruginosa resistance rates to FQs (n = 207, P = 0.0485).
Static and dynamic models of related factors to E. coli resistance rates.
| Variables | Static | Dynamic | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FE model | RE model | SYS-GMM | SYS-GMM | |
| One lag of the dependent variable | Two lags of the dependent variable | |||
| lnAMR(t-1) | 0.292*** | 0.769*** | ||
| (0.085) | (0.059) | |||
| lnAMR(t-2) | 0.022 | |||
| (0.052) | ||||
| lnMS | 0.008 | −0.275 | −0.762** | −0.296 |
| (0.609) | (0.236) | (0.374) | (0.236) | |
| lnVP | −0.098 | −0.073 | −0.190 | −0.057** |
| (0.061) | (0.049) | (0.029) | (0.026) | |
| lnHAMC | 0.491 | 0.382** | 0.332 | 0.095 |
| (0.294) | (0.150) | (0.221) | (0.094) | |
| lnVAMC | −0.090 | 0.032 | 0.023 | −0.005 |
| (0.057) | (0.040) | (0.046) | (0.027) | |
| Constant | 3.993 | 4.411** | 6.960** | 2.783 |
| (4.285) | (1.710) | (2.829) | (1.852) | |
| No. obs. | 131 | 131 | 108 | 88 |
| F | 2.19 | 44.90*** | ||
| Hausman test | 12.23** | |||
| Wald χ2 | 287.74*** | 1,025.10*** | ||
| Arellano–Bond test | ||||
| AR (1) (p-value) | [0.147] | [0.011]** | ||
| AR (2) (p-value) | [0.171] | [0.354] | ||
| Sargan test (p-value) | [0.000]*** | [0.849] | ||
FE model = fixed-effect model; RE model = random-effect model; SYS- GMM = system generalized method of moments; AMR = antimicrobial resistance; numbers inside () are robust standard errors; numbers inside [] are p-values; AR (1) = autocorrelation test of order 1; AR (2) = autocorrelation test of order 2; *, **, and *** represent, respectively, 10%, 5%, and 1% significance levels.
Static and dynamic models of related factors to P. aeruginosa resistance rates.
| Variables | Static | Dynamic | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FE model | RE model | SYS-GMM | SYS-GMM | |
| One lag of the dependent variable | Two lags of the dependent variable | |||
| lnAMR(t-1) | 0.136 | 0.189 | ||
| (0.199) | (0.221) | |||
| lnAMR(t-2) | 0.108 | |||
| (0.075) | ||||
| lnMS | −3.244*** | −0.394 | −0.439 | −0.549 |
| (0.784) | (0.449) | (0.651) | (0.693) | |
| lnVP | −0.001 | 0.020 | 0.037 | −0.036 |
| (0.061) | (0.070) | (0.045) | (0.040) | |
| lnHAMC | 1.006*** | 0.478** | 0.804*** | 0.754*** |
| (0.331) | (0.211) | (0.252) | (0.253) | |
| lnVAMC | −0.165** | 0.050 | 0.085 | 0.050 |
| (0.065) | (0.049) | (0.148) | (0.149) | |
| Constant | 23.752*** | 4.420 | 4.072 | 4.522 |
| (5.629) | (3.192) | (4.207) | (4.451) | |
| No. obs. | 130 | 130 | 105 | 84 |
| F | 7.84*** | 25.08*** | ||
| Hausman test | 23.01*** | |||
| Wald χ2 | 90.63*** | 146.59*** | ||
| Arellano–Bond test | ||||
| AP (1) (p-value) | [0.013]** | [0.342] | ||
| AP (2) (p-value) | [0.421] | [0.322] | ||
| Sargan test (p-value) | [0.195] | [0.088]* | ||
*, **, and *** represent, respectively, 10%, 5%, and 1% significance levels.