Kylie S Foo1,2, Alicja A Skowronski1, Danielle Baum1, Rebuma Firdessa-Fite3, Sebastian Thams4,5, Linshan Shang1,6, Rémi J Creusot3, Charles A LeDuc1, Dieter Egli7, Rudolph L Leibel8. 1. Division of Molecular Genetics, Department of Pediatrics and Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. 2. Integrated Cardio Metabolic Center, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 3. Department of Medicine, Columbia Center for Translational Immunology and Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. 4. Departments of Pathology and Cell Biology, Center for Motor Neuron Biology and Disease, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. 5. Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 6. Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA. 7. Division of Molecular Genetics, Department of Pediatrics and Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. de2220@columbia.edu. 8. Division of Molecular Genetics, Department of Pediatrics and Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. rl232@columbia.edu.
Abstract
Type I diabetes (T1D) is caused by immune-mediated destruction of pancreatic beta cells. This process is triggered, in part, by specific (aa 9-23) epitopes of the insulin Β chain. Previously, fish insulins were used clinically in patients allergic to bovine or porcine insulin. Fish and human insulin differ by two amino acids in the critical immunogenic region (aa 9-23) of the B chain. We hypothesized that β cells synthesizing fish insulin would be less immunogenic in a mouse model of T1D. Transgenic NOD mice in which Greater Amberjack fish (Seriola dumerili) insulin was substituted for the insulin 2 gene were generated (mouse Ins1-/- mouse Ins2-/- fish Ins2+/+). In these mice, pancreatic islets remained free of autoimmune attack. To determine whether such reduction in immunogenicity is sufficient to protect β cells from autoimmunity upon transplantation, we transplanted fish Ins2 transgenic (expressing solely Seriola dumerili Ins2), NOD, or B16:A-dKO islets under the kidney capsules of 5 weeks old female NOD wildtype mice. The B:Y16A Β chain substitution has been previously shown to be protective of T1D in NOD mice. NOD mice receiving Seriola dumerili transgenic islet transplants showed a significant (p = 0.004) prolongation of their euglycemic period (by 6 weeks; up to 18 weeks of age) compared to un-manipulated female NOD (diabetes onset at 12 weeks of age) and those receiving B16:A-dKO islet transplants (diabetes onset at 12 weeks of age). These data support the concept that specific amino acid sequence modifications can reduce insulin immunogenicity. Additionally, our study shows that alteration of a single epitope is not sufficient to halt an ongoing autoimmune response. Which, and how many, T cell epitopes are required and suffice to perpetuate autoimmunity is currently unknown. Such studies may be useful to achieve host tolerance to β cells by inactivating key immunogenic epitopes of stem cell-derived β cells intended for transplantation.
Type I diabetes (T1D) is caused by immune-mediated destruction of pancreatic beta cells. This process is triggered, in part, by specific (aa 9-23) epitopes of the insulin Β chain. Previously, fish insulins were used clinically in patientsallergic to bovine or porcine insulin. Fish and humaninsulin differ by two amino acids in the critical immunogenic region (aa 9-23) of the B chain. We hypothesized that β cells synthesizing fish insulin would be less immunogenic in a mouse model of T1D. Transgenic NOD mice in which Greater Amberjack fish (Seriola dumerili) insulin was substituted for the insulin 2 gene were generated (mouseIns1-/- mouseIns2-/- fish Ins2+/+). In these mice, pancreatic islets remained free of autoimmune attack. To determine whether such reduction in immunogenicity is sufficient to protect β cells from autoimmunity upon transplantation, we transplanted fish Ins2transgenic (expressing solely Seriola dumeriliIns2), NOD, or B16:A-dKO islets under the kidney capsules of 5 weeks old female NOD wildtype mice. The B:Y16A Β chain substitution has been previously shown to be protective of T1D in NOD mice. NOD mice receiving Seriola dumerilitransgenic islet transplants showed a significant (p = 0.004) prolongation of their euglycemic period (by 6 weeks; up to 18 weeks of age) compared to un-manipulated female NOD (diabetes onset at 12 weeks of age) and those receiving B16:A-dKO islet transplants (diabetes onset at 12 weeks of age). These data support the concept that specific amino acid sequence modifications can reduce insulin immunogenicity. Additionally, our study shows that alteration of a single epitope is not sufficient to halt an ongoing autoimmune response. Which, and how many, T cell epitopes are required and suffice to perpetuate autoimmunity is currently unknown. Such studies may be useful to achieve host tolerance to β cells by inactivating key immunogenic epitopes of stem cell-derived β cells intended for transplantation.
In type I diabetes (T1D), insulin-producing pancreatic β cells are impaired and/or lost through immune-mediated mechanisms. Affected individuals require exogenous insulin to survive. Allogeneic cadaveric islet transplantation can restore euglycemia transiently, but half of all the recipients require exogenous insulin five years post-transplantation[1].Fish insulin was one of the first vertebrate insulins isolated and sequenced[2,3]. Moreover, fish insulin was used to treat individuals with insulin-dependent diabetes in the early 1940s; particularly in patients who developed neutralizing antibodies against bovine and porcine insulins[4,5]. The Great Amberjack (Seriola dumerili), similar to mouse, contains two insulin genes: Ins 1 and Ins 2[6-8]; with the highly conserved Ins 2 being the closer homologue of the humaninsulin gene. Fish insulin is functionally active in humans, and shows little or no immunological cross-reactivity with humaninsulin, partly due to the small differences in its amino acid sequence (Fig. 1A)[9-11]. In a small study, 45 units of tuna fish insulin were administered daily to patients with T1D and was more effective than 100–145 units of bovineinsulin given daily in preventing ketoacidosis over an eight day period[12].
Figure 1
Generation of Seriola dumerili Ins2 Mouse. (A) Sequence comparison of human, mouse Ins 2, B16:A-dKO Ins2, and Seriola dumerili (amberjack) Ins 2 B chain sequences. Red colored texts indicate difference in amino acid sequence versus human. Dashed box denotes critical region in the B chain 9–23. (B) Schematic illustrating the generation of Seriola dumerili Ins2 transgenic mouse. (C) Fish transgenic on right with wildtype control at P14. (D) PCR confirmation of Seriola dumerili transgenic genotype. Band sizes of specific alleles: mouse Ins 1 (324 bp), mouse Ins 2 (198 bp), B16:A Ins (318 bp), Seriola dumerili Ins2 transgene (340 bp). Seriola dumerili transgenic (lane 1) does not contain endogenous mouse Ins 1 or Ins 2 gene, only fish Ins2. (E) Pan insulin antibody detects both fish and mouse insulin. Immunohistochemistry of Seriola dumerili transgenic pancreata shows expression of fish (top middle panel) but not mouse insulin (bottom middle panel); similar to dissected rainbow trout pancreas (right most panel). Scale bar: 100 um. (F) Body weight graph on 2 weeks and 2 months old Seriola dumerili transgenic compared to their littermates (n = 6 per group). (G) Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance tests on 4-week old NOD, B16:A-dKO, Seriola dumerili transgenics (n = 3 in each group; mean ± SEM).
The non-obese diabetic (NOD) mouse develops autoimmune diabetes spontaneously[13]. Early work by Wegmann et al. suggested that insulin played an important role as an auto-antigen in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diabetes[14,15]. They showed that in NOD mice, CD4+ T cells participate in early islet infiltrates, and that these insulin-reactive T cells recognized the 9–23aa epitope of the insulin B chain (B:9-23). Eisenbarth and others found that the NOD-specific MHC Class II allele (I-Ag7; highly homologous to the high risk human HLA-DQ8 MHC Class II allele[15,16]) shows weak binding affinity for insulin self-epitopes, possibly facilitating autoreactive T-cell escape from thymic deletion[16,17]. This faulty binding is due to an incompatibility between the insulin peptide and the MHCII binding register, and has been associated with increased susceptibility to T1D[16]. A single amino acid substitution in the insulin Β chain at position 16 (B:Y16A) in NOD mice null for Ins1 and Ins2; B16:A-dKO (Ins1−/−
Ins 2−/−. Ins2*Y16A), prevents the development of autoimmune diabetes[18,19], supporting the observation that insulin, and the B9–23 epitope in particular, is clearly an important auto-antigen in the modulation of susceptibility to diabetes in mice and humans[20-22].The amino acid sequence of the critical region of the insulin 2 B:9–23 is highly conserved across species (Fig. 1A), and there are mouseCD4+ and CD8+ T cell epitopes which react specifically with this segment of insulin gene (Table 1)[23]. We hypothesized that NOD mouse β cells expressing solely Seriola dumeriliIns2 (mouseIns1−/−, mouseIns2−/−, fish Ins2+/+) would be less diabetes-prone by virtue of glutamic acid to aspartic acid substitutions at aa13 and aa21 in Seriola dumeriliIns2 vs. human insulin in the region of the Β chain essential for immune tolerance to insulin (Fig. 1A). We further postulated that islets isolated from mice expressing solely Seriola dumeriliIns2 would be better tolerated when transplanted into diabetics-prone female NOD mice. These experiments have implications for strategies to generate clinically transplantable stem cell-derived β cells with reduced immunogenicity through alterations of major epitopes recognized by autoreactive T cells.
Table 1
Library of known epitopes on mouse insulin.
Mouse CD4+ T cell epitopes for mouse β-cell insulin auto-antigen
Position
Sequence
AA Differences from Fish Ins2
Ins1 and Ins2
A7–21
CTSICSLYQLENYCN
8
Insulin 1
L7–23
FLPLLALLALWEPKPTQ
14
L20-B11
KPTQAFVKQHLCGPHL
9
B9–23
PHLVEALYLVCGERG
3
C15–30
SPGDLQTLALEVARQK
14
C21-A5
TLALEVARQKRGIVDQ
9
Insulin 2
L14-B6
LFLWESHPTQAFVKQHL
13
L20-B11
HPTQAFVKQHLCGSHL
8
B2–17
VKQHLCGSHLVEALYL
3
B9–23
SHLVEALYLVCGERG
2
B24-C1
FFYTPMSRRE
6
C15–32
GPGAGDLQTLALEVAQQK
16
Mouse CD8+ T cell epitopes for mouse β -cell insulin autoantigen
Position
Sequence
AA Differences from FishIns2
Insulin 1/2
B15–23
LYLVCGERG
1
Insulin 2
B25-C2
FYTPMSRREV
7
A list of known mouse CD4+ and CD8+ T cell epitopes for mouse insulin auto-antigen. Bold lettering indicates the sequence differences between mouse insulin 1, 2, and Seriola dumerili Ins2.
Generation of Seriola dumeriliIns2Mouse. (A) Sequence comparison of human, mouseIns 2, B16:A-dKO Ins2, and Seriola dumerili (amberjack) Ins 2 B chain sequences. Red colored texts indicate difference in amino acid sequence versus human. Dashed box denotes critical region in the B chain 9–23. (B) Schematic illustrating the generation of Seriola dumeriliIns2transgenicmouse. (C) Fish transgenic on right with wildtype control at P14. (D) PCR confirmation of Seriola dumerilitransgenic genotype. Band sizes of specific alleles: mouseIns 1 (324 bp), mouseIns 2 (198 bp), B16:A Ins (318 bp), Seriola dumeriliIns2 transgene (340 bp). Seriola dumerilitransgenic (lane 1) does not contain endogenous mouseIns 1 or Ins 2 gene, only fish Ins2. (E) Pan insulin antibody detects both fish and mouseinsulin. Immunohistochemistry of Seriola dumerilitransgenic pancreata shows expression of fish (top middle panel) but not mouseinsulin (bottom middle panel); similar to dissected rainbow trout pancreas (right most panel). Scale bar: 100 um. (F) Body weight graph on 2 weeks and 2 months old Seriola dumerilitransgenic compared to their littermates (n = 6 per group). (G) Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance tests on 4-week old NOD, B16:A-dKO, Seriola dumerili transgenics (n = 3 in each group; mean ± SEM).Library of known epitopes on mouseinsulin.A list of known mouseCD4+ and CD8+ T cell epitopes for mouseinsulin auto-antigen. Bold lettering indicates the sequence differences between mouseinsulin 1, 2, and Seriola dumeriliIns2.
Results
Mice exclusively expressing Seriola dumerili Ins2 are viable
Mice expressing Seriola dumeriliIns2 were generated by microinjection of Seriola dumeriliIns2 transcripts incubated with B16:A-dKO mouse sperm into NOD oocytes (Fig. 1B). The F1 generation yielded 6 live births with offspring segregating for mouse insulins and, potentially, for B16:A and/or fish Ins2. One of the seven progeny expressed the Seriola dumeriliIns2 transgene. This founder mouse was crossed with NOD mice (Jax cat no. 001976) and their fish Ins2-expressing progeny were serially inter-crossed to wildtype NOD to breed out the B16:A, mouseIns1 and Ins2 alleles until only the Seriola dumeriliIns2 transgene remained (Fig. 1C–E). Seriola dumerilitransgenic mice were viable and fertile. PCR confirmed that these mice expressed Seriola dumeriliIns2 exclusively (Fig. 1D, red box). Immunohistochemistry also showed that Seriola dumerilitransgenic mice expressed fish Ins2 (Fig. 1E), but not native mouseinsulin (Fig. 1E). A polyclonal pan insulin antibody (Dako A0564) reactive against mouse, and zebrafish was used to detect the presence of Seriola dumeriliinsulin. The fish insulin genotype did not affect overall islet morphology or the locations of β-cells, α-cells, δ-cells, and PP cells (Fig. 2A–F).
Figure 2
Histologic comparison of wild type and Seriola dumerili mouse pancreata. Seriola dumerili Ins2 mice (bottom) have normal islet morphology and cyto-architecture compared to littermates with endogenous mouse Ins 1 and Ins 2 (top); insulin (red A–F), glucagon (green; A,D), pancreatic polypeptide (green; B,E), and somatostatin (green; C,F). G, H: Beta cell ultra-structure of NOD and Seriola dumerili Ins2 transgenic. Both NOD (G) and Seriola dumerili Ins 2 transgenic (H) islets contain insulin granules (yellow arrow), though Seriola dumerili Ins2 transgenic insulin granules are lighter in staining intensity compared to the NOD (n = 4; zoom in; inset). (I,J) Insulitis scoring pancreata from 12–15 weeks old NOD and Seriola dumerili Ins2 transgenics (n = 4 per group). Scale bar: 100 um.
Histologic comparison of wild type and Seriola dumerilimouse pancreata. Seriola dumeriliIns2mice (bottom) have normal islet morphology and cyto-architecture compared to littermates with endogenous mouseIns 1 and Ins 2 (top); insulin (red A–F), glucagon (green; A,D), pancreatic polypeptide (green; B,E), and somatostatin (green; C,F). G, H: Beta cell ultra-structure of NOD and Seriola dumeriliIns2transgenic. Both NOD (G) and Seriola dumeriliIns 2transgenic (H) islets contain insulin granules (yellow arrow), though Seriola dumeriliIns2transgenicinsulin granules are lighter in staining intensity compared to the NOD (n = 4; zoom in; inset). (I,J) Insulitis scoring pancreata from 12–15 weeks old NOD and Seriola dumeriliIns2 transgenics (n = 4 per group). Scale bar: 100 um.At 2 weeks of age, Seriola dumerilitransgenic pups trended to a lower body mass than control NOD (n = 6; student t test, not significant, Fig. 1F). Seriola dumeriliIns2 is functionally active, since insulin-deficientmice showed early neonatal lethality within 48 hours after birth[22]. Capillary glucose concentrations at 2 weeks of age did not differ between Seriola dumeriliIns2transgenic, and NOD mice. All were euglycemic; none were glycosuric. At 4 weeks of age, an intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test was normal in animals (n = 3 per group, Fig. 1G); plasma glucose concentrations peaked at 20 minutes and returned to basal levels at 90 minutes. At the 15–30 min time point, there was a non-significant trend to higher plasma glucose levels in Seriola dumeriliIns2transgenic compared to both NOD and B16:A-dKO (one-way ANOVA). These results suggest that fish Ins2 was sufficient to meet the metabolic demands of a developing mouse up to one month of age.By electron microscopy, islets of fish Ins2transgenic mice contained densely packed secretory granules (Fig. 2G). These were ~ 300 nm in diameter and had electron-dense cores. Crystalline forms were prominent in the cores of the Seriola dumerilitransgenic granules, characteristic of secretory granules of normal β cells (Fig. 2H). Overall, compared to the control islets (NOD), the electron-dense cores of fish Ins2transgenic islets were lightly stained as opposed to the darker dense cores in the NOD (n = 3 per group).Even at 32 weeks of age, Seriola dumerilitransgenic mice showed no evidence of islet infiltration with immunocytes (Fig. 2I,J). By comparison, most female NOD mice (bred in house; incidence of diabetes in our colony is 85% for females by age of 30 weeks when housed in our pathogen free barrier facility) showed histological evidence of insulitis (Fig. 2J; 12–32 weeks of age; n = 4 per group).At 4 weeks of age, fish Ins2transgenic mice were euglycemic. However, starting at 5 weeks of age, all male and female Seriola dumeriliIns2transgenic mice became diabetic (plasma glucose concentrations consistently over 600 mg/dL) and required exogenous insulin administration for metabolic support.The development of hyperglycemia was not due to loss of Seriola dumeriliinsulin- secreting β cells by autoimmunity. The number of islets were similar among the genotypes; the average number of islets was roughly 200 islets per mouse (n = 15 NOD; n = 10 B16:A-dKO; n = 6 Seriola dumeriliIns2 transgenics). Even at 32 weeks of age, there were no signs of inflammatory cell infiltrates in the fish transgenic islets. In contrast, the islets of NODs were heavily infiltrated (Fig. 2J). After 1 month of age, male and female Seriola dumeriliIns2transgenic mice that were supported metabolically with subcutaneous exogenous insulin pellets showed no evidence of insulitis, suggesting that the deterioration of their glucose homeostasis was most likely due to insufficient insulin transgene expression.
Lymphocyte infiltration is delayed in Seriola dumerili transgenic islet grafts
To further assess the immunogenicity of fish Ins2 transgene, we transplanted islets isolated from Seriola dumeriliIns2transgenic under the kidney capsules of healthy 5-week old female NOD mice. We investigated whether transplanted Seriola dumeriliIns2transgenic islets are less immunogenic compared to immune cells triggering NOD islets. These healthy 5 weeks old female NOD mice received 100 islets from: 1. Female NOD (n = 23 recipients); 2. B16:A-dKO transgenic (n = 16); or 3. Seriola dumeriliIns2transgenic (n = 10). Capillary glucose concentrations were monitored weekly at 10–11 AM in ad lib fed animals starting at 10 weeks of age. Transplantation of NOD (***P = 0.001, log-rank test; Fig. 3) or Seriola dumeriliIns2transgenic islets (**P = 0.004, log-rank test; Fig. 3) reduced diabetes incidence in NOD recipient mice. There was no difference in the incidence of diabetes between those receiving B16:A-dKO islets and NOD not receiving exogenous islet transplants (p = 0.312 log-rank test; Fig. 3). Transplanted NOD islets and B16:A-dKO islets were extensively infiltrated with T and B cells after onset of diabetes (Fig. 4M–P) from age of 12 weeks onwards (7 weeks post transplantation). The NOD recipients that remained diabetes-free showed absence of pancreatic islet graft CD3 and CD20 cell infiltrates, regardless of donor islet cellular phenotypes: NOD, B16:A-dKO, or Seriola dumeriliIns2transgenic (Fig. 4A–D, I–L, Q–T). After onset of diabetes, the pancreata of the recipient NOD mice showed prominent infiltrates of CD3, and CD20 cells irrespective of transplanted donor islet phenotypes (Fig. 4E,F,M,N,U,V). A portion of NOD mice transplanted with Seriola dumeriliIns2transgenic islets ultimately became diabetic (50% by end of study at 38 weeks of age) and their pancreata and grafts were analyzed for CD3 (T cell marker), and CD20 (B cell marker) cells. These cells were present in the pancreata of the recipient NOD mice (Fig. 4U,V). The Seriola dumeriliIns2transgenic islet transplants in NOD recipients that later became diabetic were infiltrated with CD3 but not CD20 positive cells (n = 4; Fig. 4W,X; Table 2). Although islets isolated from Seriola dumeriliIns2transgenic did not completely prevent the onset of diabetes, they did prolong the diabetes free period by up to 6 weeks, and reduced the incidence of diabetes in recipient NOD mice.
Figure 3
Cumulative Incidence of diabetes in NOD transplanted with NOD, B16:A-dKO or Seriola dumerili Ins 2 transgenic islets. Islets were isolated from NOD, B16:A-dKO, or Seriola dumerili Ins2 transgenic mice and transplanted under the kidney capsules of 5-week old NOD female mice before the onset of diabetes. 100 islets from each group were transplanted. Shown are Kaplan-Meier survival curves of treated, wildtype NOD, percentage of diabetes-free mice. NOD receiving Seriola dumerili islets (n = 10; in turquoise) had a longer diabetes-free period (up to 24 weeks of age) compared to NOD without any transplanted islets (n = 20 in red; ctrl); ***P = 0.004; log-rank test. Those NOD mice receiving NOD islets (n = 23; in green) also significantly increased their diabetes-free period; **P = 0.001; log-rank test. Mice receiving B16:A-dKO islets (n = 16; in purple) did not show prolongation of their diabetes-free period P = 0.312; log-rank test. In our vivarium, 50% of female NOD develop diabetes by 18wks of age, and by 26 weeks of age, ~80% are diabetic (in red; ctrl).
Figure 4
Immunohistochemistry of immune cells in pancreas and under kidney capsules. Top panel A-H are NOD mice that received NOD islets under their kidney capsules and remained normoglycemic (A–D) or became diabetic (E–H); I-P are NOD mice that received B16:A-dKO islets: some animals remained normoglycemic (I–L), others became diabetic (M–P); (Q–X) are NOD mice that received Seriola dumerili Ins2 transgenic islets: (Q–T) remained normoglycemic, while U–X are from recipients which became diabetic. Both CD3 and CD20 are present in the pancreata and islet grafts of the NOD mice that received NOD islets (E–H), and B16:A-dKO islets (M–P) that became diabetic. A fraction of the NOD receiving Seriola dumerili Ins2 transgenic islets became diabetic, and both CD3 and CD20 cells are present in pancreas (U,V), and CD3 can be seen surrounding the Seriola dumerili Ins2 transgenic islets under the kidney capsule (W), but CD20 cells are undetected in islets under the kidney capsule (X). Scale bar: 50um; n = 6 per group.
Table 2
Status of immune infiltration in pancreas and in graft post islet transplantation into NOD mouse.
Islet Donor-Recipient
Diabetes status
Pancreas
Graft
NOD-NOD
Non-diabetic
+
−
Diabetic
+
+
B16:A-dKO -NOD
Non-diabetic
+
−
Diabetic
+
+
Seriola dumerili Ins2 - NOD
Non-diabetic
+
−
Diabetic
+
+/− only T cells
A table summarizing immune infiltration responses in pancreas and grafts of NOD recipients post islet transplantation.
Cumulative Incidence of diabetes in NOD transplanted with NOD, B16:A-dKO or Seriola dumeriliIns 2transgenic islets. Islets were isolated from NOD, B16:A-dKO, or Seriola dumeriliIns2transgenic mice and transplanted under the kidney capsules of 5-week old NOD female mice before the onset of diabetes. 100 islets from each group were transplanted. Shown are Kaplan-Meier survival curves of treated, wildtype NOD, percentage of diabetes-freemice. NOD receiving Seriola dumerili islets (n = 10; in turquoise) had a longer diabetes-free period (up to 24 weeks of age) compared to NOD without any transplanted islets (n = 20 in red; ctrl); ***P = 0.004; log-rank test. Those NOD mice receiving NOD islets (n = 23; in green) also significantly increased their diabetes-free period; **P = 0.001; log-rank test. Mice receiving B16:A-dKO islets (n = 16; in purple) did not show prolongation of their diabetes-free period P = 0.312; log-rank test. In our vivarium, 50% of female NOD develop diabetes by 18wks of age, and by 26 weeks of age, ~80% are diabetic (in red; ctrl).Immunohistochemistry of immune cells in pancreas and under kidney capsules. Top panel A-H are NOD mice that received NOD islets under their kidney capsules and remained normoglycemic (A–D) or became diabetic (E–H); I-P are NOD mice that received B16:A-dKO islets: some animals remained normoglycemic (I–L), others became diabetic (M–P); (Q–X) are NOD mice that received Seriola dumeriliIns2transgenic islets: (Q–T) remained normoglycemic, while U–X are from recipients which became diabetic. Both CD3 and CD20 are present in the pancreata and islet grafts of the NOD mice that received NOD islets (E–H), and B16:A-dKO islets (M–P) that became diabetic. A fraction of the NOD receiving Seriola dumeriliIns2transgenic islets became diabetic, and both CD3 and CD20 cells are present in pancreas (U,V), and CD3 can be seen surrounding the Seriola dumeriliIns2transgenic islets under the kidney capsule (W), but CD20 cells are undetected in islets under the kidney capsule (X). Scale bar: 50um; n = 6 per group.Status of immune infiltration in pancreas and in graft post islet transplantation into NOD mouse.A table summarizing immune infiltration responses in pancreas and grafts of NOD recipients post islet transplantation.
Seriola dumerili Ins2 does not activate responsiveness of CD4+ T cells
We investigated the interactions among different insulin epitopes and T cells. We performed in vitro T cell proliferation and activation assays to examine the responsiveness of CD4+ T cells from BDC12-4.1.TCRαKO transgenic mice[24] (which are reactive to InsB:9–23) to a series of truncated insulin B:9–23 peptide variants: 1) native mouse insulin InsB:9–23; 2) R22E mutant peptide (p8E mimotope)[25] of mouse Ins2B:9–23 recognized with higher affinity (positive control); 3) Y16A mutant peptide from B16:A insulin (negative control); and 4) Seriola dumerili Ins2B:9–23 peptide with the same amino acid sequence as in the Seriola dumerilitransgenic islets transplanted into NOD mice (Fig. 1A). There was extensive T cell proliferation with both native peptide and R22E mimotope, while peptides from both B:Y16ASeriola dumerili insulins failed to induce any proliferation (Fig. 5A). Similarly, endogenous mouseinsulin elicited strong T cell stimulation, as reflected by CD25 and CD44 up-regulation, while B16:A insulin and Seriola dumeriliIns2 did not trigger T cell activation (Fig. 5B). These data are indicative of a lack of immunogenicity of Seriola dumeriliIns2 for this T cell clone.
Figure 5
Seriola dumerili Ins2 does not activate responsiveness of CD4+ T cells. A series of insulin B:9–23 peptide variants: 1) native mouse Ins2B:9–23 (blue); 2) R22E mutant peptide of mouse Ins2B:9–23 recognized with higher affinity (positive control); 3) Y16A mutant peptide from B16:A insulin (negative control), and Seriola dumerili Ins2B:9–23 peptide were examined. In vitro T cell proliferation assay (A) showed that both native and R22E-modified peptides trigger a proliferative response, while peptides from B16:A-dKO and Seriola dumerili insulin failed to elicit any T cell proliferative response even at the highest peptide concentration of 10 μM. (B) Similarly, there was strong CD4 up-regulation of activation markers with both native mouse insulin and mimotope peptides, whereas peptides from B16:A-dKO insulin and Seriola dumerili Ins2 did not activate the CD4+ T cell clone.
Seriola dumeriliIns2 does not activate responsiveness of CD4+ T cells. A series of insulin B:9–23 peptide variants: 1) native mouse Ins2B:9–23 (blue); 2) R22E mutant peptide of mouse Ins2B:9–23 recognized with higher affinity (positive control); 3) Y16A mutant peptide from B16:A insulin (negative control), and Seriola dumerili Ins2B:9–23 peptide were examined. In vitro T cell proliferation assay (A) showed that both native and R22E-modified peptides trigger a proliferative response, while peptides from B16:A-dKO and Seriola dumeriliinsulin failed to elicit any T cell proliferative response even at the highest peptide concentration of 10 μM. (B) Similarly, there was strong CD4 up-regulation of activation markers with both native mouseinsulin and mimotope peptides, whereas peptides from B16:A-dKO insulin and Seriola dumeriliIns2 did not activate the CD4+ T cell clone.
Discussion
In this study, we show that mouse β cells expressing exclusively Seriola dumeriliIns2, are functional, and can delay onset of autoimmunity in female NOD. Expression of Seriola dumeriliIns2 alone supported metabolic sufficiency in mice up to 4 weeks of age. However, these animals became diabetic shortly thereafter. To determine whether substitution of fish Ins2 was sufficient to protect β cells in the presence of an ongoing immune response, we grafted female NOD mice with Seriola dumeriliIns2- expressing islets prior to diabetes onset. As female NOD mice age, endogenous β cells of these mice are destroyed by infiltrates of both T and B cells[26,27]. Engraftment with islets expressing fish Ins2 gene was associated with a delay of diabetes onset at 6 weeks post transplantation; however, these grafts nonetheless showed T cell infiltrates.The deterioration of glucose homeostasis of Seriola dumeriliIns2transgenic mice after 4 weeks of age was not due to autoimmunity, but likely the result of lower bioactivity of fish Ins2 and/or reduced expression of the transgene. Upon provision of supplemental exogenous insulin, these animals were euglycemic and showed no histological evidence of insulitis. In autoimmune T1D- prone NOD mice, Ins1 and Ins2 genes are located on different chromosomes with different thymic tolerances[28]. Ins2 is expressed in both pancreatic islets and thymus, while the Ins1 gene is expressed only within the islets[29,30]. It has been shown that knockout of Ins2 in NOD mice accelerates diabetes while knockout of Ins1 eliminates insulitis and diabetes in female mice[29,30]. Similar to the NOD Ins1 knockout, our Seriola dumeriliIns2transgenic mice did not display insulitis in the context of the onset of diabetes after 4 weeks of age. The effects of insulin gene dosage probably played a role in the onset of diabetes our Seriola dumeriliIns2transgenic animals. Mice with one copy of Ins1 gene (null for Ins2) when fed a high fat diet, show deterioration of glucose homeostasis[31]. It is plausible that heterozygosity for functional Ins 2 would have a similar effect. The lack of immune cell infiltrations in our single founder Seriola dumeriliIns2 transgenics colony cannot be unequivocally attributed to the modification of the insulin epitopes. The presumed lower expression level of the fish Ins 2 transgene could potentially contribute to the lack of infiltration in the Seriola dumeriliIns2 transgenics, since thymic expression of transgene driven by the ratinsulin promoter can result in transgene-specific systemic tolerance[32].Our results are consistent with the studies by others, demonstrating that a B:Y16A substitution can mitigate autoimmunity and diabetes in NOD mice[18,19]. We attempted to quantify circulating fish insulin levels, and secretion levels by freshly isolated Seriola dumeriliIns2transgenic islets. However, there was only one fish insulin ELISA kit commercially available when this study was conducted, and it failed to detect secreted Seriola dumeriliIns2, or insulin in a plasma sample of rainbow trout.The 100 transplanted Seriola dumeriliIns2transgenic islets could not ultimately sustain glucose homeostasis of the NOD recipients. This outcome in itself is not surprising given the fact that these transplants represented only 5–10% of normal mouse islet mass[33]. However, these islets did apparently mitigate disease progression via mechanisms possibly similar to administration of B:9–23 peptide analogs with alanine substitutions at residues 16 and 19 in NOD mice[34]. Both Alleva et al. and our study utilize amino acid substitutions in a critical region of the insulin B chain, and resulted in delayed destruction of these transplanted islets. This delay may be partially due to the failure of particular mouse T cell clones to detect fish insulin as suggested by our in vitro T cell assay. Therefore, while endogenous islets expressing an altered insulin B chain are protected from immune assault, transplants derived from these islets are not fully protected in the presence of an ongoing autoimmune response that was initiated by the endogenous pancreas containing β cells expressing mouseinsulin. Once autoimmunity is triggered by insulin-specific T cells, T cells directed at other antigens may contribute to β cell destruction[35]. Questions regarding the cellular and molecular events that trigger and propagate epitope spreading remain. However, this study supports the extensive literature implicating the insulin B:9–23 peptide as a primary auto-antigen in autoimmune diabetes[15-18,36-38]. Allelic variation of the MHC II molecule, by influencing insulin B:9–23 binding, confers susceptibility to T1D in both NOD mice and humans[39-41]. The B:9–23 amino acid sequences of mouseIns2 and human INS are identical[30]. The effect of Seriola dumerili fish B:E13D appears comparable to that of B16:A-dKO mice in reducing immune assault on endogenous islet β cells in NOD mice[17].Given the central role of insulin as a self-antigen and the 9–23 amino acid region of the insulin B chain is an immunodominant T-cell target antigen that plays a critical role in the disease process, immunotherapies based on B:9–23 peptide analogs have been studied in mice and humans for their therapeutic potential[33,42,43]. A series of B:9–23 peptide analogs with alanine substitutions notably at aa 16 and 19, and altered peptide ligands capable of inhibiting B:9–23 induced proliferative responses, have been identified in mice[34].Subcutaneous administrations of NBI-6024 (a peptide ligand with alanine substitutions at B: residues 16 and 19) to NOD mice before or after onset of diabetes delayed the onset by up to 20 weeks and reduced the incidence of diabetes[33]. These altered peptide ligands are peptide analogs of immune-dominant auto-antigenic epitopes, which have the ability to competitively inhibit pathogenic autoreactive T cell clones from recognizing native peptide epitopes[44-46]. Based on these NOD mouse studies, several clinical trials have been conducted to assess the efficacy of modified insulin peptides in the prevention of T1D[41]. Preliminary results from three early clinical studies showed safety and tolerance of NBI-6024[43,44]. However, a randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-response phase 2 clinical trial with this peptide failed to demonstrate any clinical benefit[42].The experiments reported here suggest that modification of the insulin gene in transplanted β cells might improve their survival in recipients with extant T1D. However, our experiments also show that while the congenital substitution of the B:9-23 insulin epitope alone is sufficient to prevent autoimmunity, it is not sufficient to fully suppress assault in NOD animals congenitally sensitized to insulin. Additional modifications to eliminate major T cell epitopes expressed in β cells - without altering function of β cell proteins - may also be required to enhance β cells viability in individuals with extant T1D. To enable this capability, a comprehensive characterization of β cells T cell epitopes will be important[47,48].
Methods
Animals
The generation of NOD mice with Ins1 and Ins2 knockouts, and knock-in of a sequence-modified humanized insulin (B chain B:Y16A) mice has been previously described[11,24,25]. NOD/ShiLtJ (NOD) mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratory. Ins1-, Ins2- null mice segregating for Ins2*Y16A (B:Y16A), NOD.Cg-Tg (Ins2*Y16A)1EII Ins1tmJja Ins2tm1Jja/GseJ (B16:A-dKO)[17] were also purchased from Jackson Laboratory (cat no. 005525). The generation of BDC12–4.1.TCRαKO mice was previously described[24]. All mice were fed chow ad libitum (Purina PicoLab 5058). Mice were housed at an ambient temperature of 22–24 °C with a 12-hour dark and light cycle (lights on at 7am) in a pathogen-free barrier facility.The Great Amberjack fish (Seriola dumerili) contains 2 insulin genes (Seriola dumeriliIns1 and Seriola dumeriliIns2). We used Seriola dumeriliIns2 DNA for this study. Fish Insulin DNA was isolated from fresh Seriola dumerili obtained at a local sushi restaurant (Fig. 1B). Seriola dumerili is also marketed as yellowfin tuna at some sushi restaurants. The Seriola dumeriliIns2 genomic DNA was amplified using PCR primers5′‐ctatcgatagttgcagtagttctgcaggtcg‐3′ and 5′‐ctatcgatcagttgcagtagttctgcagg ‐3′ on Aug 4, 2009, and cloned into a TOPO TA cloning vector and sequenced for confirmation. The insulin gene was subsequently cloned using ClaI (NEB) digestion into a ClaI digested plasmid containing the ratIns2 promoter (PMID:15129273) and sequenced using Sanger sequencing. Mouse sperm from B16:A-dKO mice were incubated with a linearized plasmid at 1ng/ml Seriola dumerili DNA and ratIns2 promoter in 10 mM NaOH, and subsequently neutralized with an equal volume of 10 mM HCl as described[49,50]. Sperm heads were then microinjected into donor eggs from NOD genotype (Fig. 1B). Embryos at (2–4 cell) stage were then transferred to Day 0.5 pseudo-pregnant CD-1 surrogate mothers (Crl: CD1; obtained from Charles River). Mice segregating for the fish Ins2 transgene were crossed to wildtype NOD mice and progeny selected by genotyping to generate NOD mice expressing only fish Ins2. The Seriola dumerilitransgenic colony was established from a single founder.Only female mice were used as islet recipients in the transplantation experiments. The incidence of diabetes in our NOD colony (n = 60) is 85% by 28 weeks of age for females when kept under conventional pathogen-free conditions (Fig. 4). Fresh whole rainbow trout fish was purchased from local supermarket, and the Brockmann body (an endocrine organ which secretes insulin in teleost fish) was rapidly dissected and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for immunohistochemistry. All experiments were approved by the Columbia University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), and all experiments were performed in accordance to relevant guidelines and regulations.
Assessment of diabetes, insulitis
The clinical onset of diabetes was determined by the presence of glucose in the urine and elevated capillary blood glucose concentrations. Urine test strips were used to monitor glycosuria, and capillary tail blood glucose levels were measured with a FreeStyle blood glucose monitoring system (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago). Ad-lib fed mice were considered diabetic after 2 consecutive blood glucose values greater than 250 mg/dL obtained in the morning around 10am. For glucose tolerance testing, mice were fasted for 6 hours, and glucose was administered intraperitoneally (1 mg/g body weight); capillary glucose from tail vein was measured before injection, and at 10, 20, 30, 60, 90, and 120 mins post administration.To score insulitis, pancreata were fixed in 4% formaldehyde solution, dehydrated, and embedded into paraffin; 5 μm sections were stained with H&E and scored for severity of insulitis.
Immunohistochemistry
Pancreata and islet grafts transplanted under kidney capsules were fixed in 4% PFA overnight and embedded in paraffin. Paraffin-embedded tissue sections were stained with H&E, and sections from islet grafts were also stained with various antibodies. Primary antibodies: goat anti-glucagon (A056501; DAKO), polyclonal guinea pig anti-insulin (A0564; DAKO), rabbit anti-insulin (4590; Cell Signaling), goat anti-pancreatic polypeptide (NB100–1793; Novus Biological), rabbit anti-somatostatin (A0566, DAKO), rabbit anti-CD3 (Abcam), goat anti-CD20 (Santa Cruz). Secondary antibodies against: guinea pig (Alexa 594), goat (Alexa 488), and rabbit (Alexa 488) all from Life Technologies. Polyclonal pan insulin antibody detected both fish and mouseinsulin (Fig. 1E). To evaluate cellular infiltrations, islets throughout the entire pancreas from head to tail from an individual mouse were randomly selected. H&E staining was performed on ten randomly selected sections to assess insulitis.
Transmission electron microscopy
Pancreata were sectioned into 1–2 mm2 slices and fixed overnight with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M Sorenson’s buffer (pH 7.2), for 1 hour in preparation of Epon-embedded tissue blocks. Sections of 70 nm thickness were placed on copper grids and imaged. Processing and imaging of the sample was performed by Diagnostic Service, Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University. Insulin granules were defined as electron-dense granular structures at magnification of x 7500.
Islet isolation and transplantation
Pancreatic islets were isolated by injection of collagenase buffer (type V; Sigma-Aldrich) into the common bile duct. The pancreas was removed and incubated at 37 °C for 15 mins in collagenase buffer. The digested pancreas was washed and density gradient centrifugation was performed using Histopaque-1119 (Sigma-Aldrich) to isolate islets. The islets were handpicked under a microscope, and cultured for 3 hours at 37 °C in RPMI 1640 with 10% FBS in a 95% air 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere prior to transplantation. Total islet numbers were determined by manual counting. Batches of 100 islets were transplanted beneath the kidney capsules of 5 weeks old female NOD mice.
In vitro CD4+ T-cell stimulation assay
BDC12-4.1.TCRαKO mice were used as donors of T cell receptor transgenic T cells reactive to the Ins2B:9–23 peptide. Splenocytes from these mice were treated with red blood cell lysis buffer and labeled with Violet Cell Proliferation Dye (eBioscience), then plated at 0.2 × 106 cells per well (U-bottom 96-well plates) in complete RPMI medium containing 10%FBS, 50 IU/ml penicillin, 50 μg/ml streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine, 0.1 mM non-essential amino acids, 1 mM sodium pyruvate and 0.05 mM of 2-Mercaptoethanol. Ins2B:9–23 (p8E) amino acid sequence: SHLVEALYLVAGEEG. Peptides were added at a final concentration ranging from 100 pM to 10 μM (10-fold dilutions). After 3 days of culture in a humidified CO2 incubator at 37 °C, the cells were harvested and stained with antibodies against mouseCD4, CD25, and CD44 (Biolegend) and analyzed on BD Fortessa for CD4+ T cell activation and proliferation.
Statistical analyses
Statistical analysis included one-way ANOVA test to test differences due to genotype at the insulin locus, and performed post hoc pairwise comparison using Student’s t-test. Survival curves were analyzed with the log-rank test. Statistical tests were conducted using PRISM software (GraphPad). Statistical significance was denoted as: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001.
Authors: Maki Nakayama; Joshua N Beilke; Jean M Jasinski; Masakazu Kobayashi; Dongmei Miao; Marcella Li; Marilyne G Coulombe; Edwin Liu; John F Elliott; Ronald G Gill; George S Eisenbarth Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: L A O'Reilly; P R Hutchings; P R Crocker; E Simpson; T Lund; D Kioussis; F Takei; J Baird; A Cooke Journal: Eur J Immunol Date: 1991-05 Impact factor: 5.532