Literature DB >> 21720668

2011 update on pancreas transplantation: comprehensive trend analysis of 25,000 cases followed up over the course of twenty-four years at the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR).

Angelika C Gruessner1.   

Abstract

AIM: This study aimed to analyze the outcome of pancreas and pancreas-kidney transplantations based on the comprehensive follow-up data reported to the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR).
METHODS: As of December 2010, more than 35,000 pancreas transplantations have been reported to the IPTR: more than 24,000 transplantations in the US and more than 12,000 outside the US. Cases with follow-up information until March 2011 were included in the analysis.
RESULTS: Pancreas transplantations in diabetic patients were divided into 3 categories: those performed simultaneously with a kidney (SPK) (75%), those given after a previous kidney transplantation (PAK) (18%), and pancreas transplantation alone (PTA) (7%). The total number of pancreas transplantations steadily increased until 2004 but has since declined. The largest decrease was seen in PAK, which decreased by 50% from 2004 through 2010. Comparatively, the number of SPK decreased by 7% during this time. Era analysis of US transplantations between 1987 and 2010 showed changes in recipient and donor characteristics. Recipient age at transplantation increased significantly as well as transplantations in type 2 diabetes patients. The trend over time was towards tighter donor criteria. There was a concentration on younger donors, preferable trauma victims, with short preservation time. Surgical techniques for the drainage of the pancreatic duct changed over time, too. Now enteric drainage is the predominantly used technique in combination with systemic drainage of the venous effluent of the pancreas graft. Immunosuppressive protocols developed towards antibody induction therapy with tacrolimus and MMF as maintenance therapy. The rate of transplantations with steroid avoidance increased over time in all 3 categories. These changes have led to improved patient and graft survival. Patient survival now reaches over 95% at one year post-transplant and over 83% after 5 years. The best graft survival was found in SPK with 86% pancreas and 93% kidney graft function at one year. PAK pancreas graft function reached 80%, and PTA pancreas graft function reached 78% at one year. In all 3 categories, early technical graft loss rates decreased significantly to 8-9%. Likewise, the 1-year immunological graft loss rate also decreased: in SPK, the immunological 1-year graft loss rate was 1.8%, in PAK 3.7%, and in PTA 6.0%.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient survival and graft function improved significantly over the course of 24 years of pancreas transplantation in all 3 categories. With further reduction in surgical complications and improvements in immunosuppressive protocols, pancreas transplantation offers excellent outcomes for patients with labile diabetes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21720668      PMCID: PMC3143672          DOI: 10.1900/RDS.2011.8.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Diabet Stud        ISSN: 1613-6071


  9 in total

Review 1.  The pancreas allograft donor: current status, controversies, and challenges for the future.

Authors:  Jonathan A Fridell; Jeffrey Rogers; Robert J Stratta
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.863

Review 2.  Pancreas transplantation.

Authors:  Steve A White; James A Shaw; David E R Sutherland
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Minimization and withdrawal of steroids in pancreas and islet transplantation.

Authors:  Davide Mineo; Junichiro Sageshima; George W Burke; Camillo Ricordi
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 3.782

Review 4.  Is there a role for pancreas transplantation in type 2 diabetes mellitus?

Authors:  Alp Sener; Matthew Cooper; Stephen T Bartlett
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Outcome of pancreas transplantation in recipients older than 50 years: a single-centre experience.

Authors:  Elijah Ablorsu; Abbas Ghazanfar; Sanjay Mehra; Babatunde Campbell; Hany Riad; Ravi Pararajasingam; Neil Parrott; Michael Picton; Titus Augustine; Afshin Tavakoli
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 6.  Pancreas transplantation in the United States: a review.

Authors:  Angelika C Gruessner; David E R Sutherland; Rainer W G Gruessner
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.640

7.  Alemtuzumab induction and steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression in pancreas transplantation.

Authors:  A S R Muthusamy; A C Vaidya; S Sinha; D Roy; D E Elker; P J Friend
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Compative study of bladder versus enteric drainage in pancreas transplantation.

Authors:  C Jiménez-Romero; A Manrique; J C Meneu; F Cambra; A Andrés; J M Morales; E González; E Hernández; E Morales; M Praga; E Gutierrez; E Moreno
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 9.  Are there still roles for exocrine bladder drainage and portal venous drainage for pancreatic allografts?

Authors:  Carlton J Young
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.640

  9 in total
  64 in total

1.  Imaging pancreas transplants.

Authors:  A Yates; C Parry; M Stephens; A Eynon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Advances in pancreas transplantation.

Authors:  Shamik Dholakia; Youssof Oskrochi; Graham Easton; Vassilios Papalois
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney Transplantation-Is It a Treatment Option for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus? An Analysis of the International Pancreas Transplant Registry.

Authors:  Angelika C Gruessner; Mark R Laftavi; Oleh Pankewycz; Rainer W G Gruessner
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 4.  Encapsulated Islet Transplantation: Where Do We Stand?

Authors:  Vijayaganapathy Vaithilingam; Sumeet Bal; Bernard E Tuch
Journal:  Rev Diabet Stud       Date:  2017-06-12

Review 5.  Islet transplantation in type 1 diabetes: ongoing challenges, refined procedures, and long-term outcome.

Authors:  A M James Shapiro
Journal:  Rev Diabet Stud       Date:  2012-12-28

Review 6.  Islet and stem cell encapsulation for clinical transplantation.

Authors:  Rahul Krishnan; Michael Alexander; Lourdes Robles; Clarence E Foster; Jonathan R T Lakey
Journal:  Rev Diabet Stud       Date:  2014-05-10

7.  In patients with type 1 diabetes simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation preserves long-term kidney graft ultrastructure and function better than transplantation of kidney alone.

Authors:  Jørn P Lindahl; Finn P Reinholt; Ivar A Eide; Anders Hartmann; Karsten Midtvedt; Hallvard Holdaas; Linda T Dorg; Trine M Reine; Svein O Kolset; Rune Horneland; Ole Øyen; Knut Brabrand; Trond Jenssen
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 8.  Porcine Islet Xenografts: a Clinical Source of ß-Cell Grafts.

Authors:  Bassem F Salama; Gregory S Korbutt
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.810

9.  Results of pancreas transplantation alone with special attention to native kidney function and proteinuria in type 1 diabetes patients.

Authors:  Ugo Boggi; Fabio Vistoli; Gabriella Amorese; Rosa Giannarelli; Alberto Coppelli; Rita Mariotti; Lorenzo Rondinini; Massimiliamo Barsotti; Alberto Piaggesi; Anna Tedeschi; Stefano Signori; Nelide De Lio; Margherita Occhipinti; Emanuela Mangione; Diego Cantarovich; Stefano Del Prato; Franco Mosca; Piero Marchetti
Journal:  Rev Diabet Stud       Date:  2011-08-10

10.  A composite risk model for predicting technical failure in pancreas transplantation.

Authors:  E B Finger; D M Radosevich; T B Dunn; S Chinnakotla; D E R Sutherland; A J Matas; T L Pruett; R Kandaswamy
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 8.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.