| Literature DB >> 30895142 |
Dyna Jeanne D Godoy1,2, Jaroenporn Chokboribal3, Ruben Pauwels4,5, Wijit Banlunara6, Polkit Sangvanich7, Sukanya Jaroenporn8, Pasutha Thunyakitpisal9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/Entities:
Keywords: Acemannan; Aloe vera; Bone repair; Histopathology; Microcomputed tomography
Year: 2018 PMID: 30895142 PMCID: PMC6388811 DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2018.06.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Dent Sci ISSN: 1991-7902 Impact factor: 2.080
Figure 1Acemannan sponge characterization before and after UV irradiation. The (A) 13C-NMR, (B) 1H-NMR, and (C) FT-IR spectra show that UV irradiation did not change the composition and molecular structure of acemannan. Furthermore, (D) SEM images show no sign of acemannan sponge deterioration after UV irradiation.
Figure 2Representative 3D images of the experimental groups at four weeks post-treatment. Images shown are representative of the mean bone volume of each group. C: control; A1: acemannan 1 mg; A2: 2 mg; A4: 4 mg; and A8: 8 mg.
Figure 3Acemannan stimulated bone healing in a calvarial defect model. Three bone morphometric parameters were measured: (A) bone surface, (B) bone volume, and (C) tissue mineral density. Asterisks indicate a significant difference compared with the blood clot control group (Mean ± SE, p < 0.05).
Figure 4Photomicrograph of seven-mm diameter calvarial defect treated with acemannan sponge after four weeks. Arrows indicate the border of the defect.
Figure 5Representative histopathology of the experimental groups (C: control; A1: acemannan 1 mg; A8: acemannan 8 mg) four weeks post-treatment. Arrows indicate the defect border; Arrowheads indicate areas of active bone formation lined by cuboidal osteoblasts. The bone matrices are shown at higher magnification. OB-Old bone, NB-New bone, FT-Fibrous tissue. H&E stain.