Literature DB >> 22297272

Current trends and future perspectives of bone substitute materials - from space holders to innovative biomaterials.

Andreas Kolk1, Jörg Handschel, Wolf Drescher, Daniel Rothamel, Frank Kloss, Marco Blessmann, Max Heiland, Klaus-Dietrich Wolff, Ralf Smeets.   

Abstract

An autologous bone graft is still the ideal material for the repair of craniofacial defects, but its availability is limited and harvesting can be associated with complications. Bone replacement materials as an alternative have a long history of success. With increasing technological advances the spectrum of grafting materials has broadened to allografts, xenografts, and synthetic materials, providing material specific advantages. A large number of bone-graft substitutes are available including allograft bone preparations such as demineralized bone matrix and calcium-based materials. More and more replacement materials consist of one or more components: an osteoconductive matrix, which supports the ingrowth of new bone; and osteoinductive proteins, which sustain mitogenesis of undifferentiated cells; and osteogenic cells (osteoblasts or osteoblast precursors), which are capable of forming bone in the proper environment. All substitutes can either replace autologous bone or expand an existing amount of autologous bone graft. Because an understanding of the properties of each material enables individual treatment concepts this review presents an overview of the principles of bone replacement, the types of graft materials available, and considers future perspectives. Bone substitutes are undergoing a change from a simple replacement material to an individually created composite biomaterial with osteoinductive properties to enable enhanced defect bridging.
Copyright © 2012 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22297272     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  76 in total

1.  Multiwall carbon nanotubes/polycaprolactone scaffolds seeded with human dental pulp stem cells for bone tissue regeneration.

Authors:  M L Flores-Cedillo; K N Alvarado-Estrada; A J Pozos-Guillén; J S Murguía-Ibarra; M A Vidal; J M Cervantes-Uc; R Rosales-Ibáñez; J V Cauich-Rodríguez
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Slight changes in the mechanical stimulation affects osteoblast- and osteoclast-like cells in co-culture.

Authors:  Anke Kadow-Romacker; Georg N Duda; Nicole Bormann; Gerhard Schmidmaier; Britt Wildemann
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 3.747

3.  Planning of mandibular reconstructions based on statistical shape models.

Authors:  Stefan Raith; Sebastian Wolff; Timm Steiner; Ali Modabber; Michael Weber; Frank Hölzle; Horst Fischer
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Calcium orthophosphates (CaPO4): occurrence and properties.

Authors:  Sergey V Dorozhkin
Journal:  Prog Biomater       Date:  2015-11-19

Review 5.  Biomaterials for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Esther J Lee; F Kurtis Kasper; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Osteoinductivity of engineered cartilaginous templates devitalized by inducible apoptosis.

Authors:  Paul E Bourgine; Celeste Scotti; Sebastien Pigeot; Laurent A Tchang; Atanas Todorov; Ivan Martin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Subcranial Le Fort III Advancement with Equine-Derived Bone Grafts to Correct Syndromic Midfacial Hypoplasia: A Case Report.

Authors:  Beniamino Mattioli; Paolo Iacoviello; Carola Aldiano; Giuseppe Verrina
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2017-11-28

8.  Bone morphogenetic protein-2 release from composite hydrogels of oligo(poly(ethylene glycol) fumarate) and gelatin.

Authors:  Lucas A Kinard; Chia-Ye Chu; Yasuhiko Tabata; F Kurtis Kasper; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 4.200

9.  3D printed tricalcium phosphate scaffolds: Effect of SrO and MgO doping on in vivo osteogenesis in a rat distal femoral defect model.

Authors:  Solaiman Tarafder; Neal M Davies; Amit Bandyopadhyay; Susmita Bose
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 6.843

Review 10.  Biomaterials for Craniofacial Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Greeshma Thrivikraman; Avathamsa Athirasala; Chelsea Twohig; Sunil Kumar Boda; Luiz E Bertassoni
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2017-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.