| Literature DB >> 30894999 |
Recai Zan1, Ihsan Hubbezoglu2, Murat Unal3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/Entities:
Keywords: laser; root canal; temperature rise
Year: 2016 PMID: 30894999 PMCID: PMC6395280 DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2016.04.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Dent Sci ISSN: 1991-7902 Impact factor: 2.080
Figure 1Representative view of the temperature measurements. (A) The thermocouple wire in the coronal third region of the external root surface; (B) the thermocouple wire in the middle third region of the external root surface; (C) the thermocouple wire in the apical third region of the external root surface; (D) acrylic mold; and (E) endodontic fiber optic cable.
The mean values (standard deviation) of all groups together with their statistical comparison obtained from different power levels of lasers applied to the external surface of the root canal.a,b
| Power | KTP laser | Nd:YAG laser | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy | Apical 1/3 | Middle 1/3 | Coronal 1/3 | Apical 1/3 | Middle 1/3 | Coronal 1/3 |
| 1 W | 2.11 (0.4) A,a | 1.63 (0.3) B,a | 1.51 (0.1) C,a | 4.47 (0.9) | 3.33 (0.7) d | 3.05 (0.8) d |
| 1.5 W | 2.54 (0.5) A,b | 2.26 (0.5) B,b | 2.14 (0.5) C,b | 6.96 (0.7) | 5.90 (1.2) e | 5.37 (0.8) e |
| 2 W | 4.87 (0.7) c | 4.57 (1.0) c | 4.16 (1.0) c | 11.60 (1.3) | 9.09 (1.3) f | 8.52 (0.8) f |
KTP laser = potassium titanyl phosphate laser; Nd:YAG = neodymium-doped:yttrium aluminum garnet.
By two-way analysis of variance: F = 359.690, P < 0.001, P < 0.05 (n = 30 specimens/experimental condition).
Values with same small (horizontal rows) and big (vertical columns) superscript letters show no statistical difference at P > 0.05 by Tukey test.