| Literature DB >> 30894548 |
Christian Milani1, Sabrina Duranti1, Stefania Napoli2, Giulia Alessandri3, Leonardo Mancabelli2, Rosaria Anzalone2, Giulia Longhi2, Alice Viappiani2, Marta Mangifesta1,2, Gabriele Andrea Lugli1, Sergio Bernasconi4, Maria Cristina Ossiprandi3, Douwe van Sinderen3,5,6, Marco Ventura7,8, Francesca Turroni9,10.
Abstract
The abilities of certain microorganisms to be transferred across the food production chain, persist in the final product and, potentially, colonize the human gut are poorly understood. Here, we provide strain-level evidence supporting that dairy cattle-associated bacteria can be transferred to the human gut via consumption of Parmesan cheese. We characterize the microbial communities in samples taken from five different locations across the Parmesan cheese production chain, confirming that the final product contains microorganisms derived from cattle gut, milk, and the nearby environment. In addition, we carry out a human pilot study showing that Bifidobacterium mongoliense strains from cheese can transiently colonize the human gut, a process that can be enhanced by cow milk consumption.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30894548 PMCID: PMC6426854 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09303-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 116S rRNA gene-based microbial profiling of the 165 samples included in this study. Panel a visualizes the PCoA representation of the beta-diversity observed with samples colored based on matrix type: cow feces (CF), litters (LIT), milk (MIL), Parmesan cheese (PC). Panels b and c show whisker plots based on Chao1 and Shannon alpha-diversity, respectively, observed for a sub-sampling of 26,666 reads. The boxes represent 50 % of the data set, distributed between the first and third quartiles. The Median separates the boxes into the interquartile range, while the X represents the Mean. The lines extending vertically outside of the boxes show the outlier range. Source data are provided as a Source Data file
Average relative abundance of taxa with a prevalence of >70% in at least three matrices
| Alistipes | Bacteroides | Bifidobacterium | Corynebacterium 1 | Lactobacillus | Ruminococcaceae UCG-005 | Ruminococcaceae UCG-010 | Streptococcus | U. m. of Actinobacteria class | U. m. of Clostridiaceae 1 family | U. m. of Lachnospiraceae family | U. m. of Peptostreptococcaceae family | U. m. of Ruminococcaceae family | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | CF | 4.704% | 3.640% | 0.024% | – | 0.003% | – | – | 0.001% | 0.003% | 0.138% | – | 0.260% | 8.920% |
| P1 | MIL | 0.237% | 0.233% | 0.524% | – | 2.354% | – | – | 0.381% | 2.601% | 0.137% | – | 0.697% | 0.669% |
| P1 | LIT | 0.207% | 0.308% | 27.007% | – | 47.502% | – | – | 4.669% | 0.311% | 0.156% | – | 0.468% | 0.168% |
| P1 | PC | 0.009% | 0.020% | 0.046% | – | 87.706% | – | – | 10.707% | 0.314% | 0.012% | – | 0.023% | 0.013% |
| P2 | CF | – | – | 0.996% | – | – | 15.502% | 8.951% | 0.065% | 0.008% | – | 10.097% | – | – |
| P2 | MIL | – | – | 0.617% | – | – | 1.576% | 0.266% | 0.099% | 4.563% | – | 1.918% | – | – |
| P2 | LIT | – | – | 26.584% | – | – | 0.990% | 0.358% | 5.349% | 1.286% | – | 2.523% | – | – |
| P2 | PC | – | – | 0.038% | – | – | 0.007% | 0.002% | 12.915% | 0.266% | – | 0.005% | – | – |
| P3 | CF | – | 5.786% | 0.120% | 0.002% | – | – | – | – | – | – | 9.505% | – | – |
| P3 | MIL | – | 0.180% | 0.023% | 11.698% | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.258% | – | – |
| P3 | LIT | – | 0.750% | 3.927% | 10.005% | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2.902% | – | – |
| P3 | PC | – | 0.111% | 0.012% | 0.043% | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.016% | – | – |
| RE1 | CF | – | 5.089% | – | – | 0.015% | – | – | – | 0.001% | 0.243% | 11.009% | 0.221% | – |
| RE1 | MIL | – | 0.459% | – | – | 0.663% | – | – | – | 7.883% | 0.220% | 2.242% | 1.001% | – |
| RE1 | LIT | – | 4.959% | – | – | 21.203% | – | – | – | 1.647% | 1.054% | 5.815% | 5.182% | – |
| RE1 | PC | – | 0.063% | – | – | 85.654% | – | – | – | 0.095% | 0.028% | 0.053% | 0.014% | – |
| RE2 | CF | – | – | 0.013% | – | – | – | – | 0.007% | – | – | 3.409% | – | – |
| RE2 | MIL | – | – | 0.122% | – | – | – | – | 0.043% | – | – | 1.053% | – | – |
| RE2 | LIT | – | – | 2.600% | – | – | – | – | 1.166% | – | – | 1.394% | – | – |
| RE2 | PC | – | – | 0.016% | – | – | – | – | 6.869% | – | – | – | 0.033% | – |
Fig. 216S rRNA gene-based OTU analysis surveying possible microbial transmission events. Panel a shows a bar plot of the number of 16S rRNA gene OTUs shared between multiple matrices (prevalence of >70%) collected from the same cheese making site. Panel b reports a heat map of the bacterial taxa for which OTUs have been found to be shared with a prevalence of >70% by CF, LIT, MIL, and PC samples of the same cheese production site. Source data are provided as a Source Data file
Fig. 3Bifidobacterial ITS-based profiling of CF, MIL, and PC samples. Panel a shows a bar plot displaying the number of OTUs shared between multiple samples collected from the same cheese making site. Panel b illustrates by means of a heat map the bifidobacterial taxa for which OTUs were found to be shared with a prevalence of >70% between CF, MIL, and PC samples of the same cheese making site. Source data are provided as a Source Data file
Fig. 4Strain-specific tracing of bacterial transmission events. The heat map reports in red, purple, and blue the successful strain-specific identification of genomes assembled from shotgun metagenomics data by means of PCR, SNP profiling or PCR and SNP profiling, respectively. Presence of these strains was tested in the CF, LIT, MIL, and PC matrices sampled from the same cheese production site where they were identified. The production site is reported on the right side of the heat map. The table reports genes involved in utilization of milk-related carbohydrates predicted in the partial genomes of the traced strains. Source data are provided as a Source Data file
Fig. 5Evaluation of the performance of B. mongoliense BMONG18 in achieving human gut colonization and persistence. The graph shows the average abundance of B. mongoliense BMONG18 observed in the enrolled 10 Milk and 10 No-Milk individuals at multiple time points, as described in the study plan schematized in the upper part of the image. Error bars represent the standard deviation. P-values obtained from Student t test between Milk and No-Milk individuals are reported in the graph for each sampling point. Source data are provided as a Source Data file