Literature DB >> 30894288

Health Status After Transcatheter Mitral-Valve Repair in Heart Failure and Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: COAPT Trial.

Suzanne V Arnold1, Khaja M Chinnakondepalli1, John A Spertus1, Elizabeth A Magnuson1, Suzanne J Baron1, Saibal Kar2, D Scott Lim3, Jacob M Mishell4, William T Abraham5, JoAnn A Lindenfeld6, Michael J Mack7, Gregg W Stone8, David J Cohen9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the COAPT (Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients with Functional Mitral Regurgitation) trial, transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) led to reduced heart failure (HF) hospitalizations and improved survival in patients with symptomatic HF and 3+ to 4+ secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) on maximally-tolerated medical therapy. Given the advanced age and comorbidities of these patients, improvement in health status is also an important treatment goal.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to understand the health status outcomes of patients with HF and 3+ to 4+ secondary MR treated with TMVr versus standard care.
METHODS: The COAPT trial randomized patients with HF and 3+ to 4+ secondary MR to TMVr (n = 302) or standard care (n = 312). Health status was assessed at baseline and at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and the SF-36 health status survey. The primary health status endpoint was the KCCQ overall summary score (KCCQ-OS; range 0 to 100; higher = better; minimum clinically important difference = 5 points).
RESULTS: At baseline, patients had substantially impaired health status (mean KCCQ-OS 52.4 ± 23.0). While health status was unchanged over time in the standard care arm, patients randomized to TMVr demonstrated substantial improvement in the KCCQ-OS at 1 month (mean between-group difference 15.9 points; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.3 to 19.5 points), with only slight attenuation of this benefit through 24 months (mean between-group difference 12.8 points; 95% CI: 7.5 to 18.2 points). At 24 months, 36.4% of TMVr patients were alive with a moderately large (≥10-point) improvement versus 16.6% of standard care patients (p < 0.001), for a number needed to treat of 5.1 patients (95% CI: 3.6 to 8.7 patients). TMVr patients also reported better generic health status at each timepoint (24-month mean difference in SF-36 summary scores: physical 3.6 points; 95% CI: 1.4 to 5.8 points; mental 3.6 points; 95% CI: 0.8 to 6.4 points).
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with symptomatic HF and 3+ to 4+ secondary MR receiving maximally-tolerated medical therapy, edge-to-edge TMVr resulted in substantial early and sustained health status improvement compared with medical therapy alone. (Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation [The COAPT Trial] [COAPT]; NCT01626079).
Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  mitral valve regurgitation; quality of life; transcatheter valve

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30894288      PMCID: PMC6499691          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  18 in total

Review 1.  Adjusting for multiple testing--when and how?

Authors:  R Bender; S Lange
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Monitoring clinical changes in patients with heart failure: a comparison of methods.

Authors:  John Spertus; Eric Peterson; Mark W Conard; Paul A Heidenreich; Harlan M Krumholz; Philip Jones; Peter A McCullough; Ileana Pina; Joseph Tooley; William S Weintraub; John S Rumsfeld
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Preferences for quality of life or survival expressed by patients with heart failure.

Authors:  E F Lewis; P A Johnson; W Johnson; C Collins; L Griffin; L W Stevenson
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 10.247

5.  Percutaneous mitral valve interventions in the real world: early and 1-year results from the ACCESS-EU, a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized post-approval study of the MitraClip therapy in Europe.

Authors:  Francesco Maisano; Olaf Franzen; Stephan Baldus; Ulrich Schäfer; Jörg Hausleiter; Christian Butter; Gian Paolo Ussia; Horst Sievert; Gert Richardt; Julian D Widder; Tiziano Moccetti; Wolfgang Schillinger
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Development and evaluation of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire: a new health status measure for heart failure.

Authors:  C P Green; C B Porter; D R Bresnahan; J A Spertus
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Prognostic value of health status in patients with heart failure after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Gabriel E Soto; Philip Jones; William S Weintraub; Harlan M Krumholz; John A Spertus
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-07-19       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Health status identifies heart failure outpatients at risk for hospitalization or death.

Authors:  Paul A Heidenreich; John A Spertus; Philip G Jones; William S Weintraub; John S Rumsfeld; Saif S Rathore; Eric D Peterson; Frederick A Masoudi; Harlan M Krumholz; Edward P Havranek; Mark W Conard; Randall E Williams
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Identifying heart failure patients at high risk for near-term cardiovascular events with serial health status assessments.

Authors:  Mikhail Kosiborod; Gabriel E Soto; Philip G Jones; Harlan M Krumholz; William S Weintraub; Prakash Deedwania; John A Spertus
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-04-09       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Changing preferences for survival after hospitalization with advanced heart failure.

Authors:  Lynne W Stevenson; Anne S Hellkamp; Carl V Leier; George Sopko; Todd Koelling; J Wayne Warnica; William T Abraham; Edward K Kasper; Joseph G Rogers; Robert M Califf; Elizabeth E Schramm; Christopher M O'Connor
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  18 in total

1.  Transcatheter mitral valve repair for functional mitral regurgitation: Evaluating the evidence.

Authors:  Annetine C Gelijns; Alan J Moskowitz; Patrick T O'Gara; Gennaro Giustino; Michael J Mack; Donna M Mancini; Emilia Bagiella; Judy Hung; Gorav Ailawadi; Martin B Leon; Michael A Acker; John H Alexander; Neal W Dickert; Wendy C Taddei-Peters; Marissa A Miller
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-03-21       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 2.  The Treatment of Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Dominik Berliner; Anja Hänselmann; Johann Bauersachs
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Site-Level Variability in 30-Day Patient Outcomes After Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair in the United States.

Authors:  Ali O Malik; Adnan K Chhatriwalla; John Saxon; Vittal Hejjaji; Amanda Stebbins; Philip G Jones; David J Cohen; Suzanne V Arnold; Sreekanth Vemulapalli; Zachary K Wegermann; Andrzej Kosinski; John A Spertus
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2020-12-07

4.  The year in cardiology: heart failure.

Authors:  John G F Cleland; Alexander R Lyon; Theresa McDonagh; John J V McMurray
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2020-03-21       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Transcatheter Mitral Cerclage Ventriculoplasty: From Bench to Bedside.

Authors:  Toby Rogers; Adam B Greenbaum; Vasilis C Babaliaros; Jason R Foerst; Jaffar M Khan; Christopher G Bruce; Annette M Stine; Lowell F Satler; Emily Perdoncin; Patrick T Gleason; John C Lisko; Xin Tian; Rui Miao; Vandana Sachdev; Marcus Y Chen; Robert J Lederman
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 11.075

6.  Contemporary Trends and Outcomes of Percutaneous and Surgical Mitral Valve Replacement or Repair in Patients With Cancer.

Authors:  Avirup Guha; Amit Kumar Dey; Shuab Omer; William T Abraham; Guilherme Attizzani; Hani Jneid; Daniel Addison
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Recent Evidence and Initial Experiences of Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair of the Mitral Valve in South Korea.

Authors:  Sung-Jin Hong; Jung-Sun Kim; Geu-Ru Hong
Journal:  J Chest Surg       Date:  2021-06-05

8.  Echocardiographic assessment of functional mitral regurgitation: opening Pandora's box?

Authors:  Andreas Hagendorff; Torsten Doenst; Volkmar Falk
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2019-07-25

Review 9.  Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients with Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Raul Angel Garcia; Mary C Benton; John A Spertus
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.955

10.  Impact of atrial fibrillation on outcomes of patients treated by transcatheter mitral valve repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fuqiang Sun; Honghao Liu; Qi Zhang; Fanfan Lu; Haibo Zhan; Jiawei Zhou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.