OBJECTIVES: To create a valid, sensitive, disease-specific health status measure for patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). BACKGROUND: Quantifying health status is becoming increasingly important for CHF. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a new, self-administered, 23-item questionnaire that quantifies physical limitations, symptoms, self-efficacy, social interference and quality of life. METHODS: To establish the performance characteristics of the KCCQ, two distinct patient cohorts were recruited: 70 stable and 59 decompensated CHF patients with ejection fractions of <40. Upon entry into the study, patients were administered the KCCQ, the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire and the Short Form-36 (SF-36). Questionnaires were repeated three months later. RESULTS: Convergent validity of each KCCQ domain was documented by comparison with available criterion standards (r = 0.46 to 0.74; p < 0.001 for all). Among those with stable CHF who remained stable by predefined criteria (n = 39), minimal changes in KCCQ domains were detected over three months of observation (mean change = 0.8 to 4.0 points, p = NS for all). In contrast, large changes in score were observed among patients whose decompensated CHF improved three months later (n = 39; mean change = 15.4 to 40.4 points, p < 0.01 for all). The sensitivity of the KCCQwas substantially greater than that of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure and the SF-36 questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: The KCCQis a valid, reliable and responsive health status measure for patients with CHF and may serve as a clinically meaningful outcome in cardiovascular research, patient management and quality assessment.
OBJECTIVES: To create a valid, sensitive, disease-specific health status measure for patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). BACKGROUND: Quantifying health status is becoming increasingly important for CHF. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a new, self-administered, 23-item questionnaire that quantifies physical limitations, symptoms, self-efficacy, social interference and quality of life. METHODS: To establish the performance characteristics of the KCCQ, two distinct patient cohorts were recruited: 70 stable and 59 decompensated CHFpatients with ejection fractions of <40. Upon entry into the study, patients were administered the KCCQ, the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire and the Short Form-36 (SF-36). Questionnaires were repeated three months later. RESULTS: Convergent validity of each KCCQ domain was documented by comparison with available criterion standards (r = 0.46 to 0.74; p < 0.001 for all). Among those with stable CHF who remained stable by predefined criteria (n = 39), minimal changes in KCCQ domains were detected over three months of observation (mean change = 0.8 to 4.0 points, p = NS for all). In contrast, large changes in score were observed among patients whose decompensated CHF improved three months later (n = 39; mean change = 15.4 to 40.4 points, p < 0.01 for all). The sensitivity of the KCCQwas substantially greater than that of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure and the SF-36 questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: The KCCQis a valid, reliable and responsive health status measure for patients with CHF and may serve as a clinically meaningful outcome in cardiovascular research, patient management and quality assessment.
Authors: Taku Inohara; Pratik Manandhar; Andrzej S Kosinski; Roland A Matsouaka; Shun Kohsaka; Robert J Mentz; Vinod H Thourani; John D Carroll; Ajay J Kirtane; Joseph E Bavaria; David J Cohen; Todd L Kiefer; Jeffrey G Gaca; Samir R Kapadia; Eric D Peterson; Sreekanth Vemulapalli Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-12-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Barbara Riegel; Christopher S Lee; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Sabina De Geest; Sheryl Potashnik; Megan Patey; Steven L Sayers; Lee R Goldberg; William S Weintraub Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2012-05-30 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Marie A Bakitas; J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Deborah B Ejem; Rachel Wells; Andres Azuero; Macy L Stockdill; Konda Keebler; Elizabeth Sockwell; Sheri Tims; Sally Engler; Karen Steinhauser; Elizabeth Kvale; Raegan W Durant; Rodney O Tucker; Kathryn L Burgio; Jose Tallaj; Keith M Swetz; Salpy V Pamboukian Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: David B Bekelman; Stephanie Hooker; Carolyn T Nowels; Deborah S Main; Paula Meek; Connor McBryde; Brack Hattler; Karl A Lorenz; Paul A Heidenreich Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Andrew P Ambrosy; Ankeet S Bhatt; Amanda L Stebbins; Lisa M Wruck; Marat Fudim; Stephen J Greene; William E Kraus; Christopher M O'Connor; Ileana L Piña; David J Whellan; Robert J Mentz Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2018-02-11 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: A A Aldashev; B K Kojonazarov; T A Amatov; T M Sooronbaev; M M Mirrakhimov; N W Morrell; J Wharton; M R Wilkins Journal: Thorax Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 9.139