| Literature DB >> 30893890 |
Soultana Tatsika1,2, Katerina Karamanoli3, Hera Karayanni4, Savvas Genitsaris5.
Abstract
Ready-to-eat (RTE) leafy salad vegetables are considered foods that can be consumed immediately at the point of sale without further treatment. The aim of the study was to investigate the bacterial community composition of RTE salads at the point of consumption and the changes in bacterial diversity and composition associated with different household washing treatments. The bacterial microbiomes of rocket and spinach leaves were examined by means of 16S rRNA gene high-throughput sequencing. Overall, 886 Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) were detected in the salads' leaves. Proteobacteria was the most diverse high-level taxonomic group followed by Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes. Although they were processed at the same production facilities, rocket showed different bacterial community composition than spinach salads, mainly attributed to the different contributions of Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes to the total OTU number. The tested household decontamination treatments proved inefficient in changing the bacterial community composition in both RTE salads. Furthermore, storage duration of the salads at refrigeration temperatures affected the microbiome, by decreasing the bacterial richness and promoting the dominance of psychrotropic bacteria. Finally, both salads were found to be a reservoir of opportunistic human pathogens, while washing methods usually applied at home proved to be inefficient in their removal.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA gene; Pseudomonas; Ready-to-eat salads; foodborne pathogens; fresh produce; household treatments; illumina
Year: 2019 PMID: 30893890 PMCID: PMC6471099 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens8010037
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pathogens ISSN: 2076-0817
Samples of ready-to-eat (RTE) leafy salads, expiring date, treatment and coding used in the text.
| RTE Salad | Expiring Date | Number of Replicates | Treatment | Code |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rocket | 20 June 2018 | 2 | No treatment | RN1–RN2 |
| Water | RW1–RW2 | |||
| Acetic Acid Solution | RV1–RV2 | |||
| Rocket | 23 June 2018 | 2 | No treatment | RN3–RN4 |
| Water | RW3–RW4 | |||
| Acetic Acid Solution | RV3–RV4 | |||
| Spinach | 23 June 2018 | 4 | No treatment | SN1–SN4 |
| Water | SW1–SW4 | |||
| Acetic Acid Solution | SV1–SV4 |
Figure 1Mean numbers of OTUs in rocket (R) and spinach (S) salad samples with no treatment (N) and after water (W) and vinegar (V) solution treatments. Standard error bars are shown.
Figure 2Relative number of OTUs belonging to major high-level bacterial taxonomic groups, based on the data from all samples. Taxonomic assignment of OTUs was based on SINA searches against the SILVA 132 database, after verification searches against GenBank.
Figure 3Number of OTUs (%) of high-level bacterial taxonomic groups (order level) detected in RTE salad samples. The labels SN, SW, SV represent samples from RTE spinach salad without any treatment and with water and vinegar treatment, respectively. The labels RN, RW, RV represent samples from RTE rocket salad without any treatment and with water and vinegar treatment, respectively. Shades of grey represent Proteobacteria, shades of blue represent Bacteroidetes, and shades of green represent Firmicutes. Bacterial orders with OTU richness < 1% in all data sets are not shown.
Figure 4Cluster diagram based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarities calculated based on the non-transformed number of reads of OTUs found during the study. Red clades in the dendrogram indicate significant bifurcations, based on the SIMPROF significance test. The labels SN, SW, SV represent samples from RTE spinach salad without any treatment and with water and vinegar treatment, respectively. The labels RN, RW, RV represent samples from RTE rocket salad without any treatment and with water and vinegar treatment, respectively.
SIMPER percentage contribution of typifying taxa to the dissimilarity of the bacterial communities between rocket (R) and spinach (S) salad samples according to Bray-Curtis dissimilarities (see Figure 4), their putative higher taxonomic affiliation, their closest relative based on BLAST searches against SINA and GenBank database, the isolation source of the closest relative, and their relative abundance on the total number of reads. Coding of salad samples is indicated in Table 1.
| OTUs | Putative High-Level Taxonomic Affiliation | Closest Cultured Relative (% Similarity) [Accession Number] | Isolation Source | SIMPER Contribution (%) | SIMPER Cumulative Contribution (%) | RTE Salad | Relative Abundance (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTU001 | Gammaproteobacteria | Soil at a coal gasification site | 20.51 | 20.51 | All | 35.2 | |
| OTU003 | Gammaproteobacteria | Barkey | 10.78 | 31.28 | All | 7.4 | |
| OTU002 | Gammaproteobacteria | Mine tailings | 8.77 | 40.05 | All | 7.9 | |
| OTU004 | Gammaproteobacteria | Wastewater stream | 7.58 | 47.64 | All rocket samples & SN2 SV1 SV3 SW1 SW2 | 4.8 | |
| OTU008 | Gammaproteobacteria | Rhizosphere from Lepidium meyenii | 5.08 | 52.72 | All | 3.7 | |
| OTU0010 | Gammaproteobacteria | Commercial Cucumber Fermentation Cover brine | 4.51 | 57.23 | All | 2.8 | |
| OTU007 | Bacteroidetes | Insuyu cave | 4.32 | 61.55 | All | 3.4 | |
| OTU0011 | Gammaproteobacteria | Chelidonium majus (medical herb) | 4 | 65.56 | All | 2.5 | |
| OTU0014 | Gammaproteobacteria | Plant root | 3 | 68.55 | All spinach samples & RN3RN4RV3RV4RW2RW3RW4 | 1.8 | |
| OTU005 | Gammaproteobacteria | Dairy product | 2.72 | 71.27 | All | 4.3 | |
| OTU0015 | Gammaproteobacteria | Commercial Cucumber Fermentation Cover brine | 2.08 | 73.35 | All | 1.7 | |
| OTU0016 | Gammaproteobacteria | - | 1.8 | 75.16 | All | 1.5 | |
| OTU009 | Gammaproteobacteria | Fresh-cut escarole | 1.69 | 76.85 | All | 2.8 | |
| OTU0012 | Gammaproteobacteria | Himalayan region | 1.5 | 78.35 | All | 2.1 | |
| OTU0013 | Gammaproteobacteria | Fresh water | 1.49 | 79.84 | All | 2.1 | |
| OTU0017 | Bacteroidetes | Marine mud | 1.31 | 81.14 | All | 1.2 | |
| OTU0019 | Alphaproteobacteria | Indoor dusts in animal sheds | 1.28 | 82.42 | All except RN1. RW1. RV1 | 0.8 | |
| OTU0018 | Gammaproteobacteria | Freshwater cage culture system | 1.03 | 83.46 | All except SW2 | 0.9 | |
| OTU0021 | Firmicutes | - | 0.98 | 84.44 | All | 0.7 | |
| OTU0023 | Gammaproteobacteria | 0.94 | 85.38 | All except SW2. SW4. SV2 | 0.7 | ||
| OTU0026 | Gammaproteobacteria | “Plutella xylostella” | 0.83 | 86.21 | All | 0.5 | |
| OTU0031 | Gammaproteobacteria | - | 0.77 | 86.98 | All spinach samples & RN2RN3RV3RV4RW3RW4 | 0.5 | |
| OTU0020 | Gammaproteobacteria | Wetland. | 0.65 | 87.63 | All | 0.7 | |
| OTU0027 | Gammaproteobacteria | “Zantedeschia sp. (calla lily)” Tubers | 0.61 | 88.24 | All | 0.6 | |
| OTU0032 | Gammaproteobacteria | Skin | 0.57 | 88.81 | All | 0.4 | |
| OTU0030 | Gammaproteobacteria | Chelidonium majus root | 0.52 | 89.33 | All except SW4 | 0.4 | |
| OTU0024 | Firmicutes | Soil | 0.5 | 89.83 | All | 0.6 | |
| OTU0022 | Bacteroidetes | Rhizosphere and roots of wheat | 0.5 | 90.33 | All | 0.7 |
Figure 5Cluster diagram based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarities calculated based on the non-transformed number of reads of OTUs found in RTE rocket salad samples. Red clades in the dendrogram indicate significant bifurcations, based on the SIMPROF significance test. The labels RN, RW, RV represent samples from RTE rocket salad without any treatment and with water and vinegar treatment, respectively. Numbers 1 & 2 represent packages with expiring date of 23 June 2018, whereas numbers 3 & 4 represent packages with expiring date of 20 June 2018.